198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16388833)
21. Estimating the correlation of pairwise relatedness along chromosomes.
Hu XS
Heredity (Edinb); 2005 Mar; 94(3):338-46. PubMed ID: 15354191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. DNA microarray as a tool in establishing genetic relatedness--Current status and future prospects.
Kling D; Welander J; Tillmar A; Skare O; Egeland T; Holmlund G
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 May; 6(3):322-9. PubMed ID: 21813350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Object-oriented Bayesian networks for complex forensic DNA profiling problems.
Dawid AP; Mortera J; Vicard P
Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Jul; 169(2-3):195-205. PubMed ID: 17055679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Testing marker-based estimates of heritability in the wild.
Coltman DW
Mol Ecol; 2005 Jul; 14(8):2593-9. PubMed ID: 15969737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Pedigree reconstruction in wild cichlid fish populations.
Koch M; Hadfield JD; Sefc KM; Sturmbauer C
Mol Ecol; 2008 Oct; 17(20):4500-11. PubMed ID: 18986496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Interpreting anonymous DNA samples from mass disasters--probabilistic forensic inference using genetic markers.
Lin TH; Myers EW; Xing EP
Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 22(14):e298-306. PubMed ID: 16873485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. DNA-based paternity analysis and genetic evaluation in a large, commercial cattle ranch setting.
Van Eenennaam AL; Weaber RL; Drake DJ; Penedo MC; Quaas RL; Garrick DJ; Pollak EJ
J Anim Sci; 2007 Dec; 85(12):3159-69. PubMed ID: 17878282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Genetic variation of wild and hatchery populations of the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas assessed by microsatellite markers.
Yu H; Li Q
J Genet Genomics; 2007 Dec; 34(12):1114-22. PubMed ID: 18155624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Informativeness of genetic markers for inference of ancestry.
Rosenberg NA; Li LM; Ward R; Pritchard JK
Am J Hum Genet; 2003 Dec; 73(6):1402-22. PubMed ID: 14631557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Relationship uncertainty linkage statistics (RULS): affected relative pair statistics that model relationship uncertainty.
Ray A; Weeks DE
Genet Epidemiol; 2008 May; 32(4):313-24. PubMed ID: 18205206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Kinship determination using DNA markers].
Jorquera G H; Acuña P M; Cifuentes L L
Rev Med Chil; 2008 Feb; 136(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 18483673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Impact of candidate sire number and sire relatedness on DNA polymorphism-based measures of exclusion probability and probability of unambiguous parentage.
Sherman GB; Kachman SD; Hungerford LL; Rupp GP; Fox CP; Brown MD; Feuz BM; Holm TR
Anim Genet; 2004 Jun; 35(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 15147394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Adjusting for founder relatedness in a linkage analysis using prior information.
Sheehan NA; Egeland T
Hum Hered; 2008; 65(4):221-31. PubMed ID: 18073492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A note on the accuracy of PAC-likelihood inference with microsatellite data.
Cornuet JM; Beaumont MA
Theor Popul Biol; 2007 Feb; 71(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 16890970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A statistical treatment of biases affecting the estimation of mutation rates.
Vicard P; Dawid AP
Mutat Res; 2004 Mar; 547(1-2):19-33. PubMed ID: 15013695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. DNAc: A clustering method for identifying kinship relations between DNA profiles using a novel similarity measure.
Ntwari A; Kelil A; Drouin R; Monga E; Wang S; Brzezinski R; Bronsard M; Yan J
J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56 Suppl 1():S17-22. PubMed ID: 21077874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Estimating mutation rates from paternity casework.
Vicard P; Dawid AP; Mortera J; Lauritzen SL
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Jan; 2(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 19083784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Analysis of a claimed distant relationship in a deficient pedigree using high density SNP data.
Lareu MV; García-Magariños M; Phillips C; Quintela I; Carracedo A; Salas A
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 May; 6(3):350-3. PubMed ID: 21868300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Tri-allelic SNP markers enable analysis of mixed and degraded DNA samples.
Westen AA; Matai AS; Laros JF; Meiland HC; Jasper M; de Leeuw WJ; de Knijff P; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Sep; 3(4):233-41. PubMed ID: 19647708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A general approach to power calculation for relationship testing.
Egeland T; Pinto N; Vigeland MD
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Mar; 9():186-90. PubMed ID: 23810238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
