These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16388917)

  • 1. Long-term effects of suppressing the preratio pause.
    Derenne A; Richardson JV; Baron A
    Behav Processes; 2006 Mar; 72(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 16388917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of reinforcement magnitude and ratio values on behaviour maintained by a cyclic ratio schedule of reinforcement.
    Leslie JC; Boyle C; Shaw D
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2000 Nov; 53(4):289-308. PubMed ID: 11131787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preratio pausing: effects of an alternative reinforcer on fixed- and variable-ratio responding.
    Derenne A; Baron A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 May; 77(3):273-82. PubMed ID: 12083680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of partial reinforcement and time between reinforced trials on terminal response rate in pigeon autoshaping.
    Gottlieb DA
    Behav Processes; 2006 Mar; 72(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 16413974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Response rate and sensitivity to the molar feedback function relating response and reinforcement rate on VI+ schedules of reinforcement.
    Reed P
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Oct; 33(4):428-39. PubMed ID: 17924790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Response-cost punishment via token loss with pigeons.
    Pietras CJ; Hackenberg TD
    Behav Processes; 2005 Jun; 69(3):343-56. PubMed ID: 15896532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Progressive-ratio schedules: effects of later schedule requirements on earlier performances.
    Baron A; Derenne A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 May; 73(3):291-304. PubMed ID: 10866353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Suppression of behavior by timeout punishment when suppression results in loss of positive reinforcement.
    Kaufman A; Baron A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 Sep; 11(5):595-607. PubMed ID: 5722425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Punished and unpunished responding in multiple variable-interval schedules.
    Tullis C; Walters G
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 Mar; 11(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 5645870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Timing during inhibitory conditioning.
    Williams DA; Johns KW; Brindas M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2008 Apr; 34(2):237-46. PubMed ID: 18426306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Oscillations following periodic reinforcement.
    Monteiro T; Machado A
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):170-88. PubMed ID: 18992793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stimulus change dis-habituates operant responding supported by water reinforcers.
    McSweeney FK; Kowal BP; Murphy ES; Wiediger RS
    Behav Processes; 2005 Nov; 70(3):235-46. PubMed ID: 16112816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Passage of time leaves response-outcome associations intact.
    Colwill RM
    Behav Processes; 2006 Mar; 72(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 16458454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rapid acquisition of operant conditioning in 5-day-old rat pups: a new technique articulating suckling-related motor activity and milk reinforcement.
    Arias C; Spear NE; Molina JC; Molina A; Molina JC
    Dev Psychobiol; 2007 Sep; 49(6):576-88. PubMed ID: 17680606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The metabotropic glutamate 2/3 receptor agonist LY404039 reduces alcohol-seeking but not alcohol self-administration in alcohol-preferring (P) rats.
    Rodd ZA; McKinzie DL; Bell RL; McQueen VK; Murphy JM; Schoepp DD; McBride WJ
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 171(2):207-15. PubMed ID: 16678921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of contingent auditory stimuli on concurrent schedule performance: an alternative punisher to electric shock.
    Reed P; Yoshino T
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jul; 78(3):421-8. PubMed ID: 18406078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Morphine withdrawal decreases responding reinforced by sucrose self-administration in progressive ratio.
    Zhang D; Zhou X; Wang X; Xiang X; Chen H; Hao W
    Addict Biol; 2007 Jun; 12(2):152-7. PubMed ID: 17508986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Human choice in "counterintuitive" situations: fixed- versus progressive-ratio schedules.
    Wanchisen BA; Tatham TA; Hineline PN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Jul; 58(1):67-85. PubMed ID: 1645102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance on a progressive-ratio schedule of food reinforcement during concurrent access to a sucrose solution or tap water.
    Derenne A
    Behav Processes; 2020 Apr; 173():104040. PubMed ID: 31987848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of ethanol reinforcement in 1-day-old rats: assessment through a brief and novel operant procedure.
    Bordner KA; Molina JC; Spear NE
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2008 Apr; 32(4):580-92. PubMed ID: 18366451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.