These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16389677)
1. Sex selection abortion and the boomerang effect of a woman's right to choose: a paradox of the skeptics. Kohm LM William Mary J Women Law; 1997; 4(1):91-128. PubMed ID: 16389677 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Equality theory and reproductive freedom. Colker R Tex J Women Law; 1994; 3(1):99-122. PubMed ID: 12645608 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the flight from reason in the Supreme Court. Linton PB St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):15-137. PubMed ID: 11656611 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Emancipation as freedom in Roe v. Wade. Bezanson RP Dickinson Law Rev; 1993; 97(3):485-512. PubMed ID: 11656343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Abortion compromise -- inevitable and impossible. Law SA Univ Ill Law Rev; 1992; 25(4):921-41. PubMed ID: 11656296 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Abortion and a nation at war. First Things; 1992 Oct; 26():9-13. PubMed ID: 11659506 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Exploring the ethics of induced abortion. Bandewar S Indian J Med Ethics; 2005; 2(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 16276621 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Infanticide or civil rights for women: did the Supreme Court go too far in Stenberg v. Carhart? Schmutz SD Houst Law Rev; 2002; 39(2):529-66. PubMed ID: 15212035 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Sex selection: regulating technology enabling the predetermination of a child's gender. Jones OD Harv J Law Technol; 1992; 6(1):1-62. PubMed ID: 16594114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Casey, Bray and beyond: religious liberty and the abortion debate. Simmons PD St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):467-88. PubMed ID: 11656618 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Abortion, precedent, and the Constitution: a comment on Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. Maltz EM Notre Dame Law Rev; 1992; 68(1):11-32. PubMed ID: 11656531 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A relational approach to moral decision-making: the majority opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Sullivan PA; Goldzwig SR Q J Speech; 1995 May; 81(2):167-90. PubMed ID: 11808622 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. WomanCare of Southfield, P.C. v. Granholm. United States. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division Wests Fed Suppl; 2001; 143():827-48. PubMed ID: 16479703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The abortion right, originalism, and the Fourteenth Amendment. Graines S; Wyatt J Clevel State Law Rev; 1999; 47(2):161-91. PubMed ID: 12715815 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Casey and the resuscitation of Roe v. Wade. Robertson JA Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(5):24-8. PubMed ID: 1428831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Greenville Women's Clinic v. Bryant. U.S. District Court. D. South Carolina, Greenville Division Wests Fed Suppl; 2000; 66(F. Supp. 2d):691-745. PubMed ID: 12664905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. From arguments to Supreme Court opinions in Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Kassop N PS (Wash DC); 1993 Mar; 26(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12085874 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Protecting "pregnant persons": women's equality and reproductive freedom. Ellis DA Const Law J; 1996; 6():967-77. PubMed ID: 11657887 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Sex selection and the Charter. Boetzkes E Univ West Ont Law Rev; 1994 Jan; 7(1):173-92. PubMed ID: 11660288 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Forced labor: a thirteenth amendment defense of abortion. Koppelman A Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1990; 84(2):480-535. PubMed ID: 11656392 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]