BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

504 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16390487)

  • 1. Refractive group differences in accommodation microfluctuations with changing accommodation stimulus.
    Day M; Strang NC; Seidel D; Gray LS; Mallen EA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Jan; 26(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 16390487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of modulating ocular depth of focus upon accommodation microfluctuations in myopic and emmetropic subjects.
    Day M; Seidel D; Gray LS; Strang NC
    Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(2):211-8. PubMed ID: 18992269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cognition, ocular accommodation, and cardiovascular function in emmetropes and late-onset myopes.
    Davies LN; Wolffsohn JS; Gilmartin B
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 May; 46(5):1791-6. PubMed ID: 15851584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The relationship between object spatial profile and accommodation microfluctuations in emmetropes and myopes.
    Day M; Gray LS; Seidel D; Strang NC
    J Vis; 2009 Sep; 9(10):5.1-13. PubMed ID: 19810786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of blur adaptation on blur sensitivity and discrimination in emmetropes and myopes.
    Cufflin MP; Mankowska A; Mallen EA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Jun; 48(6):2932-9. PubMed ID: 17525230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Technical note: effect of contact lenses on measurement of the accommodation microfluctuations.
    Day M; Strang NC; Seidel D; Gray LS
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jan; 28(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 18201340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Static accommodative responses following adaptation to differential levels of blur.
    Cufflin MP; Hazel CA; Mallen EA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Jul; 27(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 17584286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variability of the accommodation response in early onset myopia.
    Langaas T; Riddell PM; Svarverud E; Ystenaes AE; Langeggen I; Bruenech JR
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jan; 85(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 18174839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamic accommodation responses following adaptation to defocus.
    Cufflin MP; Mallen EA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Oct; 85(10):982-91. PubMed ID: 18832977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differences in the accommodation stimulus response curves of adult myopes and emmetropes.
    Abbott ML; Schmid KL; Strang NC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1998 Jan; 18(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 9666906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Open-loop accommodation in emmetropia and myopia.
    Strang NC; Gilmartin BS; Gray LS; Winfield NR; Winn B
    Curr Eye Res; 2000 Mar; 20(3):190-4. PubMed ID: 10694894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Additivity of near work-induced transient myopia and its decay characteristics in different refractive groups.
    Vasudevan B; Ciuffreda KJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Feb; 49(2):836-41. PubMed ID: 18235035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retinotopic accommodation responses in myopia.
    Seidel D; Gray LS; Heron G
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Mar; 44(3):1035-41. PubMed ID: 12601026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of monocular and binocular viewing on the accommodation response to real targets in emmetropia and myopia.
    Seidel D; Gray LS; Heron G
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Apr; 82(4):279-85. PubMed ID: 15829856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of spatial frequency on the accommodation responses of myopes and emmetropes under various detection demands.
    Xu J; Zheng Z; Drobe B; Jiang J; Chen H
    Vision Res; 2015 Oct; 115(Pt A):1-7. PubMed ID: 26218290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tonic accommodation, age, and refractive error in children.
    Zadnik K; Mutti DO; Kim HS; Jones LA; Qiu PH; Moeschberger ML
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 May; 40(6):1050-60. PubMed ID: 10235538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Systematic measurement errors involved in over-refraction using an autorefractor (Grand-Seiko WV-500): is measurement of accommodative lag through spectacle lenses valid?
    Kimura S; Hasebe S; Ohtsuki H
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 May; 27(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 17470241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sensitivity of Chaos Measures in Detecting Stress in the Focusing Control Mechanism of the Short-Sighted Eye.
    Hampson KM; Cufflin MP; Mallen EAH
    Bull Math Biol; 2017 Aug; 79(8):1870-1887. PubMed ID: 28639168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. AC/A ratio, age, and refractive error in children.
    Mutti DO; Jones LA; Moeschberger ML; Zadnik K
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Aug; 41(9):2469-78. PubMed ID: 10937556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamic accommodation and myopia.
    Culhane HM; Winn B
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Aug; 40(9):1968-74. PubMed ID: 10440250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.