These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16390712)

  • 1. The role of supracervical hysterectomy in benign disease of the uterus.
    Esdaile BA; Chalian RA; Del Priore G; Smith JR
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Jan; 26(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 16390712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perioperative complication rate in 1706 patients after a standardized laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy technique.
    Bojahr B; Raatz D; Schonleber G; Abri C; Ohlinger R
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 16698522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attitudes toward mode of hysterectomy: a survey-based study among German gynecologists.
    David M; Wild D; Wernecke KD; Siedentopf F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Oct; 164(2):216-20. PubMed ID: 22765973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy for benign gynecologic conditions.
    Hamilton B; McClellan SN; Rettenmaier MA; Goldstein BH
    JSLS; 2009; 13(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 19366535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Abdominal hysterectomy practice patterns in the United States.
    Sills ES; Saini J; Steiner CA; McGee M; Gretz HF
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1998 Dec; 63(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 9989898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic implementation of laparoscopic hysterectomy independent of uterus size: clinical effect.
    Uccella S; Cromi A; Bogani G; Casarin J; Formenti G; Ghezzi F
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(4):505-16. PubMed ID: 23870240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Severe complications caused by retained tissue in laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy.
    Lieng M; Istre O; Busund B; Qvigstad E
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(3):231-3. PubMed ID: 16698531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy outcomes.
    Sarmini OR; Lefholz K; Froeschke HP
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 15904614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A randomized comparison of total or supracervical hysterectomy: surgical complications and clinical outcomes.
    Esdaile BA; Chalian RA; Del Priore G; Smith JR
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar; 103(3):581; author reply 582-3. PubMed ID: 14990424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attitudes to mode of hysterectomy--a survey-based study among Swedish gynecologists.
    Persson P; Hellborg T; Brynhildsen J; Fredrikson M; Kjølhede P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(3):267-74. PubMed ID: 19241224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minilaparotomy vs laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign gynaecological diseases.
    Sirisabya N; Manchana T
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2014 Jan; 34(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 24359054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The decline of hysterectomy for benign disease.
    Horgan RP; Burke G
    Ir Med J; 2009 Mar; 102(3):70, 72-3. PubMed ID: 19489192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Hysterectomy for benign lesions in the north of France: epidemiology and postoperative events].
    Debodinance P
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2001 Apr; 30(2):151-9. PubMed ID: 11319467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The place of hysterectomy in the management of benign uterine disease.
    Mawson AR
    HMO Pract; 1996 Jun; 10(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 10158543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Resource use for total and supracervical hysterectomies: results of a randomized trial.
    Showstack J; Kuppermann M; Lin F; Vittinghoff E; Varner RE; Summitt RL; McNeeley SG; Learman LA; Richter H; Hulley S; Washington AE
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 May; 103(5 Pt 1):834-41. PubMed ID: 15121553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy.
    Jenkins TR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Dec; 191(6):1875-84. PubMed ID: 15592268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An audit on hysterectomy for benign diseases in public hospitals in Hong Kong.
    Leung PL; Tsang SW; Yuen PM;
    Hong Kong Med J; 2007 Jun; 13(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 17548906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Supracervical and total abdominal hysterectomy trends in New York State: 1990-1996.
    Sills ES; Saini J; Applegate MS; McGee M; Gretz HF
    J Urban Health; 1998 Dec; 75(4):903-10. PubMed ID: 9854251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surgical outcome and cost comparison between total vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy for uteri weighing >500 g.
    Cho HY; Park ST; Kim HB; Kang SW; Park SH
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 23932973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changing routes of hysterectomy: a cross sectional and comparative study.
    Shrestha NS; Saha R; Karki C
    Nepal Med Coll J; 2010 Sep; 12(3):176-9. PubMed ID: 21446367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.