These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16391991)
1. Efficacy of biphasic waveform compared to monophasic waveform for cardioversion of atrial flutter in pediatric patients. Batra AS; Hasan BS; Hurwitz RA Pediatr Cardiol; 2006; 27(2):230-3. PubMed ID: 16391991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative efficacy of monophasic and biphasic waveforms for transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. Gurevitz OT; Ammash NM; Malouf JF; Chandrasekaran K; Rosales AG; Ballman KV; Hammill SC; White RD; Gersh BJ; Friedman PA Am Heart J; 2005 Feb; 149(2):316-21. PubMed ID: 15846271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biphasic versus monophasic shock for external cardioversion of atrial flutter: a prospective, randomized trial. Mortensen K; Risius T; Schwemer TF; Aydin MA; Köster R; Klemm HU; Lutomsky B; Meinertz T; Ventura R; Willems S Cardiology; 2008; 111(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 18239394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the rectilinear biphasic waveform with the monophasic damped sine waveform for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and flutter. Niebauer MJ; Brewer JE; Chung MK; Tchou PJ Am J Cardiol; 2004 Jun; 93(12):1495-9. PubMed ID: 15194019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Impact of electrical shock waveform and paddle positions on efficacy of direct current cardioversion for atrial fibrillation]. Stanaitiene G; Babarskiene RM Medicina (Kaunas); 2008; 44(9):665-72. PubMed ID: 18971603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reduced cardioversion thresholds for atrial fibrillation and flutter using the rectilinear biphasic waveform. Niebauer MJ; Chung MK; Brewer JE; Tchou PJ J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2005 Jul; 13(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 16133842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Transthoracic cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation: comparison of three different waveforms]. Santomauro M; Borrelli A; Ottaviano L; Costanzo A; Monteforte N; Duilio C; Chiariello M Ital Heart J Suppl; 2004 Jan; 5(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 15253143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy of biphasic waveform cardioversion for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter compared with conventional monophasic waveforms. Ermis C; Zhu AX; Sinha S; Iskos D; Sakaguchi S; Lurie KG; Benditt DG Am J Cardiol; 2002 Oct; 90(8):891-2. PubMed ID: 12372583 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Biphasic versus monophasic shock waveform for conversion of atrial fibrillation. Rho RW; Page RL Card Electrophysiol Rev; 2003 Sep; 7(3):290-1. PubMed ID: 14739730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Ambulatory electrocardioversion of atrial fibrillation by means of biphasic versus monophasic shock delivery. A prospective randomized study]. Neumann T; Erdogan A; Reiner C; Siemon G; Kurzidim K; Berkowitsch A; Kuniss M; Sperzel J; Hamm CW; Pitschner HF Z Kardiol; 2004 May; 93(5):381-7. PubMed ID: 15160273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of balanced biphasic defibrillation waveforms in transthoracic atrial cardioversion. Krasteva V; Trendafilova E; Cansell A; Daskalov I J Med Eng Technol; 2001; 25(2):68-73. PubMed ID: 11452635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A randomized controlled trial of efficacy and ST change following use of the Welch-Allyn MRL PIC biphasic waveform versus damped sine monophasic waveform for external DC cardioversion. Ambler JJ; Deakin CD Resuscitation; 2006 Nov; 71(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 16987583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]