262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16392344)
1. In vitro evaluation of bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface of different implant systems.
Steinebrunner L; Wolfart S; Bössmann K; Kern M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(6):875-81. PubMed ID: 16392344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implant-abutment interface design affects fatigue and fracture strength of implants.
Steinebrunner L; Wolfart S; Ludwig K; Kern M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1276-84. PubMed ID: 19040443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bacterial colonization of the implant-abutment interface using an in vitro dynamic loading model.
Koutouzis T; Wallet S; Calderon N; Lundgren T
J Periodontol; 2011 Apr; 82(4):613-8. PubMed ID: 21043798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of repeated screw tightening on bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface.
do Nascimento C; Pedrazzi V; Miani PK; Moreira LD; de Albuquerque RF
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Dec; 20(12):1394-7. PubMed ID: 19709063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Leakage of saliva through the implant-abutment interface: in vitro evaluation of three different implant connections under unloaded and loaded conditions.
do Nascimento C; Miani PK; Pedrazzi V; Gonçalves RB; Ribeiro RF; Faria AC; Macedo AP; de Albuquerque RF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):551-60. PubMed ID: 22616048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microbial leakage through the implant-abutment interface of Morse taper implants in vitro.
Aloise JP; Curcio R; Laporta MZ; Rossi L; da Silva AM; Rapoport A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Mar; 21(3):328-35. PubMed ID: 20074246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface of premachined or cast components.
do Nascimento C; Barbosa RE; Issa JP; Watanabe E; Ito IY; Albuquerque RF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Feb; 37(2):177-80. PubMed ID: 17931833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fracture strength and failure mode of five different single-tooth implant-abutment combinations.
Strub JR; Gerds T
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 12737249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization to evaluate the internal contamination of dental implants and comparison of bacterial leakage with cast or pre-machined abutments.
do Nascimento C; Barbosa RE; Issa JP; Watanabe E; Ito IY; de Albuquerque Junior RF
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jun; 20(6):571-7. PubMed ID: 19250244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microbial leakage and marginal fit of the implant-abutment interface.
Jansen VK; Conrads G; Richter EJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):527-40. PubMed ID: 9274082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro evaluation of the implant-abutment bacterial seal: the locking taper system.
Dibart S; Warbington M; Su MF; Skobe Z
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(5):732-7. PubMed ID: 16274147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A New Experimental Design for Bacterial Microleakage Investigation at the Implant-Abutment Interface: An In Vitro Study.
Zipprich H; Miatke S; Hmaidouch R; Lauer HC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 26800161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of implant-abutment microgap and bacterial leakage in five external-hex implant systems: an in vitro study.
Dias EC; Bisognin ED; Harari ND; Machado SJ; da Silva CP; Soares GD; Vidigal GM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):346-51. PubMed ID: 22442774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Load fatigue performance of four implant-abutment interface designs: effect of torque level and implant system.
Quek HC; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):253-62. PubMed ID: 18548921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bacterial leakage in implants with different implant-abutment connections: an in vitro study.
Assenza B; Tripodi D; Scarano A; Perrotti V; Piattelli A; Iezzi G; D'Ercole S
J Periodontol; 2012 Apr; 83(4):491-7. PubMed ID: 21780904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fluids and microbial penetration in the internal part of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-abutment connections.
Piattelli A; Scarano A; Paolantonio M; Assenza B; Leghissa GC; Di Bonaventura G; Catamo G; Piccolomini R
J Periodontol; 2001 Sep; 72(9):1146-50. PubMed ID: 11577944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The peri-implant sulcus compared with internal implant and suprastructure components: a microbiological analysis.
Cosyn J; Van Aelst L; Collaert B; Persson GR; De Bruyn H
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Dec; 13(4):286-95. PubMed ID: 19673920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fatigue resistance of two implant/abutment joint designs.
Khraisat A; Stegaroiu R; Nomura S; Miyakawa O
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):604-10. PubMed ID: 12488853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of Taper Angle and Sealant Agents on Bacterial Leakage Along the Implant-Abutment Interface: An In Vitro Study Under Loaded Conditions.
Ozdiler A; Bakir-Topcuoglu N; Kulekci G; Isik-Ozkol G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):1071–1077. PubMed ID: 29894549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
