262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16392344)
21. Bacterial culture and DNA Checkerboard for the detection of internal contamination in dental implants.
Barbosa RE; do Nascimento C; Issa JP; Watanabe E; Ito IY; de Albuquerque RF
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):376-81. PubMed ID: 19374709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Microbiological evaluation of bacterial and mycotic seal in implant systems with different implant-abutment interfaces and closing torque values.
Baggi L; Di Girolamo M; Mirisola C; Calcaterra R
Implant Dent; 2013 Aug; 22(4):344-50. PubMed ID: 23782848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The implant-abutment interface of alumina and zirconia abutments.
Yüzügüllü B; Avci M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 May; 10(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 18218054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Microleakage at the abutment-implant interface of osseointegrated implants: a comparative study.
Gross M; Abramovich I; Weiss EI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 10074758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of the precision of fit between the Procera custom abutment and various implant systems.
Lang LA; Sierraalta M; Hoffensperger M; Wang RF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):652-8. PubMed ID: 14579952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. In vitro evaluation of bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface of an external-hex implant after saliva incubation.
do Nascimento C; Miani PK; Watanabe E; Pedrazzi V; de Albuqerque RF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):782-7. PubMed ID: 21841988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An in vitro investigation concerning the bacterial leakage at implants with internal hexagon and Morse taper implant-abutment connections.
Tripodi D; Vantaggiato G; Scarano A; Perrotti V; Piattelli A; Iezzi G; DʼErcole S
Implant Dent; 2012 Aug; 21(4):335-9. PubMed ID: 22814560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Microleakage into and from two-stage implants: an in vitro comparative study.
Teixeira W; Ribeiro RF; Sato S; Pedrazzi V
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 21365038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The effect of dynamic loading on bacterial colonization of the dental implant fixture-abutment interface: an in vitro study.
Koutouzis T; Mesia R; Calderon N; Wong F; Wallet S
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Aug; 40(4):432-7. PubMed ID: 25106007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Bacterial colonisation of interior implant threads with and without sealing.
Proff P; Steinmetz I; Bayerlein T; Dietze S; Fanghänel J; Gedrange T
Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2006 Feb; 65(1):75-7. PubMed ID: 16783744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface: culture and DNA Checkerboard hybridization analyses.
do Nascimento C; Miani PK; Pedrazzi V; Muller K; de Albuquerque RF
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Oct; 23(10):1168-72. PubMed ID: 22092990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The Role of Chlorhexidine on Endotoxin Penetration to the Implant-Abutment Interface (IAI).
Koutouzis T; Gadalla H; Kettler Z; Elbarasi A; Nonhoff J
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 17(3):476-82. PubMed ID: 24112587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. An in vitro load evaluation of a conical implant system with 2 abutment designs and 3 different retaining-screw alloys.
Erneklint C; Odman P; Ortengren U; Karlsson S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):733-7. PubMed ID: 17066634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cyclic loading of implant-supported prostheses: comparison of gaps at the prosthetic-abutment interface when cycled abutments are replaced with as-manufactured abutments.
Hecker DM; Eckert SE; Choi YG
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jan; 95(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 16399272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cross-sectional analysis of the implant-abutment interface.
Coelho AL; Suzuki M; Dibart S; DA Silva N; Coelho PG
J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Jul; 34(7):508-16. PubMed ID: 17559619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of repeated torque/mechanical loading cycles on two different abutment types in implants with internal tapered connections: an in vitro study.
Ricciardi Coppedê A; de Mattos Mda G; Rodrigues RC; Ribeiro RF
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jun; 20(6):624-32. PubMed ID: 19281502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Multiple single-tooth implant restorations in the posterior jaws: maintenance of marginal bone levels with reference to the implant-abutment microgap.
Norton MR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):777-84. PubMed ID: 17066640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Fracture resistance and failure location of zirconium and metallic implant abutments.
Aramouni P; Zebouni E; Tashkandi E; Dib S; Salameh Z; Almas K
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):41-8. PubMed ID: 18997915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Bacterial Colonization of the Implant-Abutment Interface (IAI) of Dental Implants with a Sloped Marginal Design: An in-vitro Study.
Koutouzis T; Gadalla H; Lundgren T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 18(1):161-7. PubMed ID: 25623033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
