117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16392602)
1. Adjunctive diagnostic value of targeted electrical impedance imaging to conventional methods in the evaluation of breast lesions.
Szabó BK; Saracco A; Wilczek B; Boné B; Aspelin P
Acta Radiol; 2005 Dec; 46(8):782-90. PubMed ID: 16392602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Electrical impedance scanning in the differentiation of suspicious breast lesions: comparison with mammography, ultrasound and histopathology].
Fuchsjäger MH; Helbich TH; Ringl H; Funovics MA; Rudas M; Riedl C; Pfarl G
Rofo; 2002 Dec; 174(12):1522-9. PubMed ID: 12471524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electrical impedance scanning for classifying suspicious breast lesions: first results.
Malich A; Fritsch T; Anderson R; Boehm T; Freesmeyer MG; Fleck M; Kaiser WA
Eur Radiol; 2000; 10(10):1555-61. PubMed ID: 11044924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Utilisation of electrical impedance tomography and/or ultrasound and mammography in breast disease diagnosis: a controlled study].
Xu F; Li MX; Jusko HZ; Jiang H
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 May; 97(18):1391-1395. PubMed ID: 28535624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The negative predictive value of electrical impedance scanning in BI-RADS category IV breast lesions.
Fuchsjaeger MH; Flöry D; Reiner CS; Rudas M; Riedl CC; Helbich TH
Invest Radiol; 2005 Jul; 40(7):478-85. PubMed ID: 15973141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differentiation of mammographically suspicious lesions: evaluation of breast ultrasound, MRI mammography and electrical impedance scanning as adjunctive technologies in breast cancer detection.
Malich A; Boehm T; Facius M; Freesmeyer MG; Fleck M; Anderson R; Kaiser WA
Clin Radiol; 2001 Apr; 56(4):278-83. PubMed ID: 11286578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of diagnostic mammography and breast ultrasound during pregnancy and lactation.
Robbins J; Jeffries D; Roubidoux M; Helvie M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Mar; 196(3):716-22. PubMed ID: 21343518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast lesions: imaging with contrast-enhanced subharmonic US--initial experience.
Forsberg F; Piccoli CW; Merton DA; Palazzo JJ; Hall AL
Radiology; 2007 Sep; 244(3):718-26. PubMed ID: 17690324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective evaluation of the value of combined mammographic and sonographic assessment in patients with palpable abnormalities of the breast.
Shetty MK; Shah YP; Sharman RS
J Ultrasound Med; 2003 Mar; 22(3):263-8; quiz 269-70. PubMed ID: 12636326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electrical impedance measurement of the breast: effect of hormonal changes associated with the menstrual cycle.
Perlet C; Kessler M; Lenington S; Sittek H; Reiser M
Eur Radiol; 2000; 10(10):1550-4. PubMed ID: 11044923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Role of high frequency ultrasonography in the evaluation of palpable breast masses in Chinese women: alternative to mammography?
Yang WT; Mok CO; King W; Tang A; Metreweli C
J Ultrasound Med; 1996 Sep; 15(9):637-44. PubMed ID: 8866446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A reconstruction algorithm for breast cancer imaging with electrical impedance tomography in mammography geometry.
Choi MH; Kao TJ; Isaacson D; Saulnier GJ; Newell JC
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Apr; 54(4):700-10. PubMed ID: 17405377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Value of MR imaging in clinical evaluation of breast lesions.
Kristoffersen Wiberg M; Aspelin P; Perbeck L; Boné B
Acta Radiol; 2002 May; 43(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12100324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of Palpation Imaging in Diagnosis of Breast Diseases: A Way to Improve the Detection Rate.
Ding Y; Sun C; Zhou Q; Cheng C; Yan C; Wang B
Med Sci Monit; 2020 Nov; 26():e927553. PubMed ID: 33247894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dual-frequency electrical impedance mammography for the diagnosis of non-malignant breast disease.
Trokhanova OV; Okhapkin MB; Korjenevsky AV
Physiol Meas; 2008 Jun; 29(6):S331-44. PubMed ID: 18544828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of mammography and ultrasound in women with breast disease: a receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Ying X; Lin Y; Xia X; Hu B; Zhu Z; He P
Breast J; 2012; 18(2):130-8. PubMed ID: 22356352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness of breast electrical impedance imaging for clinically suspicious breast lesions.
Daglar G; Senol K; Yakut ZI; Yuksek YN; Tutuncu T; Tez M; Yesiltepe CH
Bratisl Lek Listy; 2016; 117(9):505-510. PubMed ID: 27677193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Characterization of sonographically detected breast lesions using three-dimensional data sets].
Fischer T; Filimonow S; Hamm B; Slowinski T; Thomas A
Rofo; 2006 Dec; 178(12):1224-34. PubMed ID: 17136646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Triple approach in the diagnosis of dominant breast masses: combined physical examination, mammography, and fine-needle aspiration.
Kaufman Z; Shpitz B; Shapiro M; Rona R; Lew S; Dinbar A
J Surg Oncol; 1994 Aug; 56(4):254-7. PubMed ID: 8057655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adjunctive diagnostic value of ultrasonography evaluation in patients with suspected ductal breast disease.
Ballesio L; Maggi C; Savelli S; Angeletti M; Rabuffi P; Manganaro L; Porfiri LM
Radiol Med; 2007 Apr; 112(3):354-65. PubMed ID: 17440697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
