These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16392604)

  • 1. Renal artery stenosis evaluated with 3D-Gd-magnetic resonance angiography using transstenotic pressure gradient as the standard of reference. A multireader study.
    Eklöf H; Ahlstrom H; Bostrom A; Bergqvist D; Andrén B; Karacagil S; Nyman R
    Acta Radiol; 2005 Dec; 46(8):802-9. PubMed ID: 16392604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gd-enhanced 3D phase-contrast MR angiography and dynamic perfusion imaging in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis.
    Miller S; Schick F; Duda SH; Nägele T; Hahn U; Teufl F; Müller-Schimpfle M; Erley CM; Albes JM; Claussen CD
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1998 Nov; 16(9):1005-12. PubMed ID: 9839984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy and safety of gadodiamide (Gd-DTPA-BMA) in renal 3D-magnetic resonance angiography (MRA): a phase II study.
    Kittner T; Rudolf J; Fages JF; Legmann P; Aschauer M; Repa I; Alvares MR; Savalegui I; Ittrich H; Geterud K; de Kevviler E; Ayuso J; Lockhart ME; Blum A; Iliasch H; Leisinger G; van Beek EJ; Reid AW; Brown JJ; Yu TC; Flamm SD; Düber C; Judmaier W; Reimer P; Stiskal M; Kramann B; Wolff S; Blankenstein C
    Eur J Radiol; 2007 Dec; 64(3):456-64. PubMed ID: 17412546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Non-enhanced MR angiography of renal arteries: comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
    Angeretti MG; Lumia D; Canì A; Barresi M; Nocchi Cardim L; Piacentino F; Maresca AM; Novario R; Genovese EA; Fugazzola C
    Acta Radiol; 2013 Sep; 54(7):749-56. PubMed ID: 23550187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of normal-dose contrast-enhanced MR angiography in assessing renal artery stenosis and accessory renal arteries.
    Korst MB; Joosten FB; Postma CT; Jager GJ; Krabbe JK; Barentsz JO
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Mar; 174(3):629-34. PubMed ID: 10701600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Morphologic and functional magnetic resonance imaging of renal artery stenosis: a multireader tricenter study.
    Schoenberg SO; Knopp MV; Londy F; Krishnan S; Zuna I; Lang N; Essig M; Hawighorst H; Maki JH; Stafford-Johnson D; Kallinowski F; Chenevert TL; Prince MR
    J Am Soc Nephrol; 2002 Jan; 13(1):158-169. PubMed ID: 11752033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Diagnosis of renal artery stenosis with magnetic resonance angiography and stenosis quantification].
    Marchand B; Hernandez-Hoyos M; Orkisz M; Douek P
    J Mal Vasc; 2000 Dec; 25(5):312-320. PubMed ID: 11148391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Noninvasive investigation for renal artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and color Doppler sonography as compared to digital subtraction angiography.
    Voiculescu A; Hofer M; Hetzel GR; Malms J; Mödder U; Grabensee B; Hollenbeck M
    Clin Exp Hypertens; 2001 Oct; 23(7):521-31. PubMed ID: 11710754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Non-contrast-enhanced MRA of renal artery stenosis: validation against DSA in a porcine model.
    Bley TA; François CJ; Schiebler ML; Wieben O; Takei N; Brittain JH; Del Rio AM; Grist TM; Reeder SB
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Feb; 26(2):547-55. PubMed ID: 26017736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Renal artery stenosis and accessory renal arteries: accuracy of detection and visualization with gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography.
    Bakker J; Beek FJ; Beutler JJ; Hene RJ; de Kort GA; de Lange EE; Moons KG; Mali WP
    Radiology; 1998 May; 207(2):497-504. PubMed ID: 9577501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Imaging modalities for renal artery stenosis in suspected renovascular hypertension: prospective intraindividual comparison of color Doppler US, CT angiography, GD-enhanced MR angiography, and digital substraction angiography.
    Rountas C; Vlychou M; Vassiou K; Liakopoulos V; Kapsalaki E; Koukoulis G; Fezoulidis IV; Stefanidis I
    Ren Fail; 2007; 29(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 17497443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of digital subtraction angiography with gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis.
    Thornton J; O'Callaghan J; Walshe J; O'Brien E; Varghese JC; Lee MJ
    Eur Radiol; 1999; 9(5):930-4. PubMed ID: 10369993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Renal artery stenosis: comparative evaluation of gadolinium-enhanced MRA and DSA.
    Stacul F; Gava S; Belgrano M; Cernic S; Pagnan L; Pozzi Mucelli F; Cova MA
    Radiol Med; 2008 Jun; 113(4):529-46. PubMed ID: 18480971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 3D FIESTA pulse sequence for assessing renal artery stenosis: is it a reliable application in unenhanced magnetic resonance angiography?
    Gaudiano C; Busato F; Ferramosca E; Cecchelli C; Corcioni B; De Sanctis LB; Santoro A; Golfieri R
    Eur Radiol; 2014 Dec; 24(12):3042-50. PubMed ID: 25059677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of renal transplants.
    Johnson DB; Lerner CA; Prince MR; Kazanjian SN; Narasimham DL; Leichtman AB; Cho KJ
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1997; 15(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 9084020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography of renal artery stenosis: diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability.
    Völk M; Strotzer M; Lenhart M; Manke C; Nitz WR; Seitz J; Feuerbach S; Link J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jun; 174(6):1583-8. PubMed ID: 10845486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the renal arteries. Original investigation.
    Hany TF; Leung DA; Pfammatter T; Debatin JF
    Invest Radiol; 1998 Sep; 33(9):653-9. PubMed ID: 9766050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography and duplex of the iliac arteries compared with intra-arterial pressure gradient measurements.
    Wikström J; Holmberg A; Johansson L; Löfberg AM; Smedby O; Karacagil S; Ahlström H
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2000 May; 19(5):516-23. PubMed ID: 10828234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: a reliable clinical tool for evaluating transplant renal artery stenosis.
    Zhang LJ; Peng J; Wen J; Schoepf UJ; Varga-Szemes A; Griffith LP; Yu YM; Tao SM; Li YJ; Ni XF; Xu J; Shi DH; Lu GM
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Oct; 28(10):4195-4204. PubMed ID: 29666993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hemodynamic significance of renal artery stenosis: digital subtraction angiography versus systolically gated three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography.
    Wasser MN; Westenberg J; van der Hulst VP; van Baalen J; van Bockel JH; van Erkel AR; Pattynama PM
    Radiology; 1997 Feb; 202(2):333-8. PubMed ID: 9015052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.