These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16392604)

  • 21. Review of source images is necessary for the evaluation of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography for renal artery stenosis.
    Wehrschuetz M; Aschauer M; Portugaller H; Stix A; Wehrschuetz-Sigl E; Hausegger K; Ebner F
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2004; 27(5):441-6. PubMed ID: 15383846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluating patients with renal failure for renal artery stenosis with gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography.
    Ghantous VE; Eisen TD; Sherman AH; Finkelstein FO
    Am J Kidney Dis; 1999 Jan; 33(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 9915265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of non-breath-hold high resolution gadolinium-enhanced MRA with digital subtraction angiography in the evaluation on allograft renal artery stenosis.
    Chan YL; Leung CB; Yu SC; Yeung DK; Li PK
    Clin Radiol; 2001 Feb; 56(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 11222071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in renal artery stenosis: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
    Law YM; Tay KH; Gan YU; Cheah FK; Tan BS
    Hong Kong Med J; 2008 Apr; 14(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 18382021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Renal MR angiography at 1.0 T: three-dimensional (3D) phase-contrast techniques versus gadolinium-enhanced 3D fast low-angle shot breath-hold imaging.
    Hahn U; Miller S; Nägele T; Schick F; Erdtmann B; Duda S; Claussen CD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jun; 172(6):1501-8. PubMed ID: 10350280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Contrast-enhanced, K-space-centered, breath-hold MR angiography of the renal arteries and the abdominal aorta.
    Steffens JC; Link J; Grässner J; Mueller-Huelsbeck S; Brinkmann G; Reuter M; Heller M
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1997; 7(4):617-22. PubMed ID: 9243378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A prospective comparison of duplex ultrasonography, captopril renography, MRA, and CTA in assessing renal artery stenosis.
    Eklöf H; Ahlström H; Magnusson A; Andersson LG; Andrén B; Hägg A; Bergqvist D; Nyman R
    Acta Radiol; 2006 Oct; 47(8):764-74. PubMed ID: 17050355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The capability of inflow inversion recovery magnetic resonance compared to contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance in renal artery angiography.
    Xu X; Lin X; Huang J; Pan Z; Zhu X; Chen K; Zee CS; Yan F
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Oct; 42(10):2479-2487. PubMed ID: 28470403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Aortoiliac and renal arteries: prospective intraindividual comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography and multi-detector row CT angiography.
    Willmann JK; Wildermuth S; Pfammatter T; Roos JE; Seifert B; Hilfiker PR; Marincek B; Weishaupt D
    Radiology; 2003 Mar; 226(3):798-811. PubMed ID: 12601190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Renal artery assessment with non-enhanced MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography: comparison between 1.5 and 3.0 T.
    Guo X; Gong Y; Wu Z; Yan F; Ding X; Xu X
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1747-1754. PubMed ID: 31797079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An international multicenter comparison of time-SLIP unenhanced MR angiography and contrast-enhanced CT angiography for assessing renal artery stenosis: the renal artery contrast-free trial.
    Albert TS; Akahane M; Parienty I; Yellin N; Catalá V; Alomar X; Prot A; Tomizawa N; Xue H; Katabathina VS; Lopera JE; Jin Z
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):182-8. PubMed ID: 25539255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Multidetector-row CT angiography of renal artery stenosis in 50 consecutive patients: prospective interobserver comparison with DSA.
    Fraioli F; Catalano C; Bertoletti L; Danti M; Fanelli F; Napoli A; Cavacece M; Passariello R
    Radiol Med; 2006 Apr; 111(3):459-68. PubMed ID: 16683091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Renal artery stenosis evaluation: diagnostic performance of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR angiography--comparison with DSA.
    Soulez G; Pasowicz M; Benea G; Grazioli L; Niedmann JP; Konopka M; Douek PC; Morana G; Schaefer FK; Vanzulli A; Bluemke DA; Maki JH; Prince MR; Schneider G; Ballarati C; Coulden R; Wasser MN; McCauley TR; Kirchin MA; Pirovano G
    Radiology; 2008 Apr; 247(1):273-85. PubMed ID: 18372471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of gadodiamide-enhanced MR angiography to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography for evaluation of renal artery stenosis: results of a phase III multicenter trial.
    Garovic VD; Achauer MA; Kittner T; Horák D; Sheng R; Stanson AW
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Feb; 31(2):390-7. PubMed ID: 20099352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomographic angiography and gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for the assessment of hemodynamically significant transplant renal artery stenosis.
    Gaddikeri S; Mitsumori L; Vaidya S; Hippe DS; Bhargava P; Dighe MK
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2014; 43(4):162-8. PubMed ID: 24948209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Gadolinium-enhanced breathhold three-dimensional time-of-flight renal MR angiography in the evaluation of potential renal donors.
    Nelson HA; Gilfeather M; Holman JM; Nelson EW; Yoon HC
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1999 Feb; 10(2 Pt 1):175-81. PubMed ID: 10082106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Non-contrast MR angiography versus contrast enhanced MR angiography for detection of renal artery stenosis: a comparative analysis in 400 renal arteries.
    Lal H; Singh RKR; Yadav P; Yadav A; Bhadauria D; Singh A
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 May; 46(5):2064-2071. PubMed ID: 33136181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of duplex ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of significant renal artery stenosis.
    Solar M; Zizka J; Krajina A; Michl A; Raupach J; Klzo L; Ryska P; Ceral J
    Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove); 2011; 54(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 21542417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR angiography: Diagnostic performance of four doses for detection and grading of carotid, renal, and aorto-iliac stenoses compared to digital subtraction angiography.
    Schneider G; Ballarati C; Grazioli L; Manfredi R; Thurnher S; Kroencke TJ; Taupitz M; Merlino B; Bonomo L; Shen N; Pirovano G; Kirchin MA; Spinazzi A
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Oct; 26(4):1020-32. PubMed ID: 17896354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Renal artery assessment with nonenhanced steady-state free precession versus contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
    Wyttenbach R; Braghetti A; Wyss M; Alerci M; Briner L; Santini P; Cozzi L; Di Valentino M; Katoh M; Marone C; Vock P; Gallino A
    Radiology; 2007 Oct; 245(1):186-95. PubMed ID: 17717326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.