These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16393006)

  • 1. Improving construct validity: Cronbach, Meehl, and Neurath's ship.
    Westen D; Rosenthal R
    Psychol Assess; 2005 Dec; 17(4):409-12. PubMed ID: 16393006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On construct validity: issues of method and measurement.
    Smith GT
    Psychol Assess; 2005 Dec; 17(4):396-408. PubMed ID: 16393005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Deconstructing, reconstructing, preserving Paul E. Meehl's legacy of construct validity.
    Maher BA; Gottesman II
    Psychol Assess; 2005 Dec; 17(4):415-22. PubMed ID: 16393008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Introduction to the special section on construct validity of psychological tests: 50 years after Cronbach and Meehl (1955).
    Strauss ME
    Psychol Assess; 2005 Dec; 17(4):395. PubMed ID: 16393004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Social anxiety and fear of negative evaluation: construct validity of the BFNE-II.
    Carleton RN; Collimore KC; Asmundson GJ
    J Anxiety Disord; 2007; 21(1):131-41. PubMed ID: 16675196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the complexity of quantifying construct validity.
    Smith GT
    Psychol Assess; 2005 Dec; 17(4):413-4. PubMed ID: 16393007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incremental validity principles in test construction.
    Smith GT; Fischer S; Fister SM
    Psychol Assess; 2003 Dec; 15(4):467-77. PubMed ID: 14692843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. From test validity to construct validity … and back?
    Colliver JA; Conlee MJ; Verhulst SJ
    Med Educ; 2012 Apr; 46(4):366-71. PubMed ID: 22429172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Toward a process-focused model of test score validity: improving psychological assessment in science and practice.
    Bornstein RF
    Psychol Assess; 2011 Jun; 23(2):532-44. PubMed ID: 21668126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The incremental validity of psychological testing and assessment: conceptual, methodological, and statistical issues.
    Hunsley J; Meyer GJ
    Psychol Assess; 2003 Dec; 15(4):446-55. PubMed ID: 14692841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Construct validity and case validity in assessment.
    Teglasi H; Nebbergall AJ; Newman D
    Psychol Assess; 2012 Jun; 24(2):464-75. PubMed ID: 22040515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing the relative fit of categorical and dimensional latent variable models using consistency tests.
    Ruscio J; Walters GD; Marcus DK; Kaczetow W
    Psychol Assess; 2010 Mar; 22(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 20230147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inferential errors in taxometric analyses of ordered three-class constructs.
    McGrath RE
    J Pers Assess; 2008 Jan; 90(1):11-25. PubMed ID: 18444091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Constructing personality scales under the assumptions of an ideal point response process: toward increasing the flexibility of personality measures.
    Chernyshenko OS; Stark S; Drasgow F; Roberts BW
    Psychol Assess; 2007 Mar; 19(1):88-106. PubMed ID: 17371125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Incremental validity of new clinical assessment measures.
    Haynes SN; Lench HC
    Psychol Assess; 2003 Dec; 15(4):456-66. PubMed ID: 14692842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What if there were no psychometrics?: constructs, complexity, and measurement.
    Barrett P
    J Pers Assess; 2005 Oct; 85(2):134-40; discussion 141-5. PubMed ID: 16171413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Focus groups in psychological assessment: enhancing content validity by consulting members of the target population.
    Vogt DS; King DW; King LA
    Psychol Assess; 2004 Sep; 16(3):231-43. PubMed ID: 15456379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conceptual complexity and construct validity.
    McGrath RE
    J Pers Assess; 2005 Oct; 85(2):112-24. PubMed ID: 16171410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Introduction to the special section on incremental validity and utility in clinical assessment.
    Hunsley J
    Psychol Assess; 2003 Dec; 15(4):443-5. PubMed ID: 14692840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What should become of depressive personality disorder in DSM-V?
    Huprich SK
    Harv Rev Psychiatry; 2009; 17(1):41-59. PubMed ID: 19205966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.