These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16393045)

  • 1. Does retrieval fluency contribute to the underconfidence-with-practice effect?
    Serra MJ; Dunlosky J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Nov; 31(6):1258-66. PubMed ID: 16393045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lack of pervasiveness of the underconfidence-with-practice effect: boundary conditions and an explanation via anchoring.
    Scheck P; Nelson TO
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Feb; 134(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 15702968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of memory for past test in the underconfidence with practice effect.
    Finn B; Metcalfe J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jan; 33(1):238-44. PubMed ID: 17201565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exploring a mnemonic debiasing account of the underconfidence-with-practice effect.
    Koriat A; Ma'ayan H; Sheffer L; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 May; 32(3):595-608. PubMed ID: 16719669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing objective and subjective learning curves: judgments of learning exhibit increased underconfidence with practice.
    Koriat A; Sheffer L; Ma'ayan H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2002 Jun; 131(2):147-62. PubMed ID: 12049237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Age differences in the underconfidence-with-practice effect.
    Rast P; Zimprich D
    Exp Aging Res; 2009 Oct; 35(4):400-31. PubMed ID: 20183099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Judgments of learning index relative confidence, not subjective probability.
    Zawadzka K; Higham PA
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Nov; 43(8):1168-79. PubMed ID: 26111879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of delaying judgments of learning on metacognitive accuracy: a meta-analytic review.
    Rhodes MG; Tauber SK
    Psychol Bull; 2011 Jan; 137(1):131-48. PubMed ID: 21219059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The contributions of anchoring and past-test performance to the underconfidence-with-practice effect.
    England BD; Serra MJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Aug; 19(4):715-22. PubMed ID: 22477335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A model for stochastic drift in memory strength to account for judgments of learning.
    Sikström S; Jönsson F
    Psychol Rev; 2005 Oct; 112(4):932-50. PubMed ID: 16262474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of divided attention on global judgment of learning accuracy.
    Barnes KA; Dougherty MR
    Am J Psychol; 2007; 120(3):347-59. PubMed ID: 17892083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Processing similarity does not improve metamemory: evidence against transfer-appropriate monitoring.
    Weaver CA; Kelemen WL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1058-65. PubMed ID: 14622046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A revised methodology for research on metamemory: Pre-judgment Recall and Monitoring (PRAM).
    Nelson TO; Narens L; Dunlosky J
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Mar; 9(1):53-69. PubMed ID: 15053719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How many dimensions underlie judgments of learning and recall? Evidence from state-trace methodology.
    Jang Y; Nelson TO
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):308-26. PubMed ID: 16131266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Judgments of Learning are Influenced by Memory for Past Test.
    Finn B; Metcalfe J
    J Mem Lang; 2008 Jan; 58(1):19-34. PubMed ID: 19079570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Judgments of learning: evidence for a two-stage process.
    Son LK; Metcalfe J
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Sep; 33(6):1116-29. PubMed ID: 16496730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multiple study trials and judgments of learning.
    Meeter M; Nelson TO
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2003 Jun; 113(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 12750044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Metamemory judgments and the benefits of repeated study: improving recall predictions through the activation of appropriate knowledge.
    Tiede HL; Leboe JP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):822-8. PubMed ID: 19379052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Metacognition in prospective memory: are performance predictions accurate?
    Schnitzspahn KM; Zeintl M; Jäger T; Kliegel M
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2011 Mar; 65(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 21443326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting one's own forgetting: the role of experience-based and theory-based processes.
    Koriat A; Bjork RA; Sheffer L; Bar SK
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2004 Dec; 133(4):643-56. PubMed ID: 15584811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.