These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16393132)

  • 1. Composite resin in medicine and dentistry.
    Stein PS; Sullivan J; Haubenreich JE; Osborne PB
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2005; 15(6):641-54. PubMed ID: 16393132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Black or white--Which choice for the molars? Part 2. Which does one choose for the restoration of posterior teeth: amalgam or composite?].
    De Moor R; Delmé K
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2008; 63(4):135-46. PubMed ID: 19227687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality and Survival of Direct Light-Activated Composite Resin Restorations in Posterior Teeth: A 5- to 20-Year Retrospective Longitudinal Study.
    Borgia E; Baron R; Borgia JL
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e195-e203. PubMed ID: 28513897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Guidance on posterior resin composites: Academy of Operative Dentistry - European Section.
    Lynch CD; Opdam NJ; Hickel R; Brunton PA; Gurgan S; Kakaboura A; Shearer AC; Vanherle G; Wilson NH;
    J Dent; 2014 Apr; 42(4):377-83. PubMed ID: 24462699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Direct restoration of severely damaged incisors using short fiber-reinforced composite resin.
    Garoushi S; Vallittu PK; Lassila LV
    J Dent; 2007 Sep; 35(9):731-6. PubMed ID: 17614187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
    Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M
    J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimization of large MOD restorations: Composite resin inlays vs. short fiber-reinforced direct restorations.
    Soares LM; Razaghy M; Magne P
    Dent Mater; 2018 Apr; 34(4):587-597. PubMed ID: 29366492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Posterior composites: Update on cavities and filling techniques.
    Sabbagh J; McConnell RJ; McConnell MC
    J Dent; 2017 Feb; 57():86-90. PubMed ID: 27889605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Direct fiber-reinforced composite restoration in an endodontically-treated molar: a three-year case report.
    Deliperi S
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 18435197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Teaching of direct posterior resin composite restorations in UK dental therapy training programmes.
    Lynch CD; Wilson NH
    Br Dent J; 2010 May; 208(9):415-21. PubMed ID: 20448613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Twelve-year survival of 2-surface composite resin and amalgam premolar restorations placed by dental students.
    Naghipur S; Pesun I; Nowakowski A; Kim A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):336-9. PubMed ID: 27086110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical Performance and Epidemiologic Aspects of Fractured Anterior Teeth Restored with a Composite Resin: A Two-Year Clinical Study.
    Vural UK; Kiremitçi A; Gökalp S
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e204-e209. PubMed ID: 28960769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Despite all--do we have an appropriate substitute for amalgam?].
    Levin L; Samorodnitzky-Naveh G; Coval M; Geiger SB
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2008 Apr; 25(2):23-6, 73. PubMed ID: 18780542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical guidelines for posterior semidirect composite resin restorations: a case report with a 17-month follow-up.
    Mezarina-Kanashiro FN; Santos FFV; Furuse AY
    Gen Dent; 2024; 72(4):50-53. PubMed ID: 38905605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors relating to usage patterns of amalgam and resin composite for posterior restorations--a prospective analysis.
    Khalaf ME; Alomari QD; Omar R
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):785-92. PubMed ID: 24769386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictable cementation of esthetic restorations: part II--selection criteria and guidelines for implementation.
    Quintas AF
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2007 Oct; 19(9):7-9. PubMed ID: 18038716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Directly Placed Restorative Materials: Review and Network Meta-analysis.
    Schwendicke F; Göstemeyer G; Blunck U; Paris S; Hsu LY; Tu YK
    J Dent Res; 2016 Jun; 95(6):613-22. PubMed ID: 26912220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Composite veneering of complex amalgam restorations.
    Demarco FF; Zanchi CH; Bueno M; Piva E
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 17288335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Glass ionomer cements: a review of composition, chemistry, and biocompatibility as a dental and medical implant material.
    Kovarik RE; Haubenreich JE; Gore D
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2005; 15(6):655-71. PubMed ID: 16393133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.