These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Introduction to special issue: moving forward in pediatric neuropsychology. Daly BP; Giovannetti T; Zabel TA; Chute DL Clin Neuropsychol; 2011 Aug; 25(6):897-902. PubMed ID: 21955109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Statistical power and effect sizes of clinical neuropsychology research. Bezeau S; Graves R J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2001 Jun; 23(3):399-406. PubMed ID: 11419453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies. Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An introduction to meta-analysis for psychotherapy outcome research. Berkeljon A; Baldwin SA Psychother Res; 2009 Jul; 19(4-5):511-8. PubMed ID: 20183404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The meta-analytic approach to research integration. Onyskiw JE Can J Nurs Res; 1996; 28(3):69-85. PubMed ID: 8997940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Difference-based meta-analytic procedures for between-participant and/or within-participant designs: a tutorial review for sports and exercise scientists. Ashford D; Davids K; Bennett SJ J Sports Sci; 2009 Feb; 27(3):237-55. PubMed ID: 19153862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Meta-analysis in medical research: potentials and limitations. Zwahlen M; Renehan A; Egger M Urol Oncol; 2008; 26(3):320-9. PubMed ID: 18452828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Classic or Bayesian research design and analysis. Does it make a difference? Bloom BS; de Pouvourville N; Libert S Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2002; 18(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 11987435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The functional neuroanatomy of the human orbitofrontal cortex: evidence from neuroimaging and neuropsychology. Kringelbach ML; Rolls ET Prog Neurobiol; 2004 Apr; 72(5):341-72. PubMed ID: 15157726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative alternatives to narrative reviews for understanding existing research literature. Fitzgerald SM; Rumrill PD Work; 2005; 24(3):317-23. PubMed ID: 15912021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The case for the development and use of "ecologically valid" measures of executive function in experimental and clinical neuropsychology. Burgess PW; Alderman N; Forbes C; Costello A; Coates LM; Dawson DR; Anderson ND; Gilbert SJ; Dumontheil I; Channon S J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2006 Mar; 12(2):194-209. PubMed ID: 16573854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Alternative methods for formal literature review and meta-analysis in AHCPR Patient Outcomes Research Teams. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Powe NR; Turner JA; Maklan CW; Ersek M Med Care; 1994 Jul; 32(7 Suppl):JS22-37. PubMed ID: 8028411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The power of statistical tests for moderators in meta-analysis. Hedges LV; Pigott TD Psychol Methods; 2004 Dec; 9(4):426-45. PubMed ID: 15598097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Methodology of basic research in cognitive neuropsychology]. Benedet MJ Rev Neurol; 2003 Mar 1-15; 36(5):457-66. PubMed ID: 12640600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Generalizability and transferability of meta-synthesis research findings. Finfgeld-Connett D J Adv Nurs; 2010 Feb; 66(2):246-54. PubMed ID: 20423407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Under the meta-scope: possibilities and limits of meta-analyses]. Egger M Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1998 Nov; 128(48):1893-901. PubMed ID: 9879617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]