These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16394206)

  • 1. The limitations due to exposure detection limits for regression models.
    Schisterman EF; Vexler A; Whitcomb BW; Liu A
    Am J Epidemiol; 2006 Feb; 163(4):374-83. PubMed ID: 16394206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bias in the estimation of exposure effects with individual- or group-based exposure assessment.
    Kim HM; Richardson D; Loomis D; Van Tongeren M; Burstyn I
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2011; 21(2):212-21. PubMed ID: 20179749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating Outcome-Exposure Associations when Exposure Biomarker Detection Limits vary Across Batches.
    Boss J; Mukherjee B; Ferguson KK; Aker A; Alshawabkeh AN; Cordero JF; Meeker JD; Kim S
    Epidemiology; 2019 Sep; 30(5):746-755. PubMed ID: 31299670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian adjustment for covariate measurement errors: a flexible parametric approach.
    Hossain S; Gustafson P
    Stat Med; 2009 May; 28(11):1580-600. PubMed ID: 19226564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An easy-to-implement approach for analyzing case-control and case-only studies assuming gene-environment independence and Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.
    Lee WC; Wang LY; Cheng KF
    Stat Med; 2010 Oct; 29(24):2557-67. PubMed ID: 20799260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Model-based imputation approach for data analysis in the presence of non-detects.
    Krishnamoorthy K; Mallick A; Mathew T
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Apr; 53(3):249-63. PubMed ID: 19181626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methodologic issues in epidemiologic risk assessment.
    Nurminen M; Nurminen T; Corvalán CF
    Epidemiology; 1999 Sep; 10(5):585-93. PubMed ID: 10468438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation in generalized linear models under censored covariates with an application to MIREC data.
    Lee WC; Sinha SK; Arbuckle TE; Fisher M
    Stat Med; 2018 Dec; 37(29):4539-4556. PubMed ID: 30168157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nonparametric rank regression for analyzing water quality concentration data with multiple detection limits.
    Fu L; Wang YG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Feb; 45(4):1481-9. PubMed ID: 21265501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Part 1. Statistical Learning Methods for the Effects of Multiple Air Pollution Constituents.
    Coull BA; Bobb JF; Wellenius GA; Kioumourtzoglou MA; Mittleman MA; Koutrakis P; Godleski JJ
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2015 Jun; (183 Pt 1-2):5-50. PubMed ID: 26333238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using objective and subjective information to develop distributions for probabilistic exposure assessment.
    Taylor AC
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1993; 3(3):285-98. PubMed ID: 8260838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating adjusted risk difference (RD) and number needed to treat (NNT) measures in the Cox regression model.
    Laubender RP; Bender R
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):851-9. PubMed ID: 20213710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Epidemiologic evaluation of measurement data in the presence of detection limits.
    Lubin JH; Colt JS; Camann D; Davis S; Cerhan JR; Severson RK; Bernstein L; Hartge P
    Environ Health Perspect; 2004 Dec; 112(17):1691-6. PubMed ID: 15579415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement error in environmental epidemiology and the shape of exposure-response curves.
    Rhomberg LR; Chandalia JK; Long CM; Goodman JE
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2011 Sep; 41(8):651-71. PubMed ID: 21823979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of exposure measurement error when an exposure variable is constrained by a lower limit.
    Richardson DB; Ciampi A
    Am J Epidemiol; 2003 Feb; 157(4):355-63. PubMed ID: 12578806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantifying and reporting uncertainty from systematic errors.
    Phillips CV
    Epidemiology; 2003 Jul; 14(4):459-66. PubMed ID: 12843772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of methods for imputing ordinal data using multivariate normal imputation: a case study of non-linear effects in a large cohort study.
    Lee KJ; Galati JC; Simpson JA; Carlin JB
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(30):4164-74. PubMed ID: 22826110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the potential of measurement error to induce differential bias on odds ratio estimates: an example from radon epidemiology.
    Heid IM; Küchenhoff H; Wellmann J; Gerken M; Kreienbrock L; Wichmann HE
    Stat Med; 2002 Nov; 21(21):3261-78. PubMed ID: 12375303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new method for generating distributions of biomonitoring equivalents to support exposure assessment and prioritization.
    Phillips MB; Sobus JR; George BJ; Isaacs K; Conolly R; Tan YM
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Aug; 69(3):434-42. PubMed ID: 24845241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.