These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16395181)

  • 1. An examination of the reliability of a classification algorithm for subgrouping patients with low back pain.
    Fritz JM; Brennan GP; Clifford SN; Hunter SJ; Thackeray A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jan; 31(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 16395181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The interrater reliability among physical therapists newly trained in a classification system for acute low back pain.
    Heiss DG; Fitch DS; Fritz JM; Sanchez WJ; Roberts KE; Buford JA
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2004 Aug; 34(8):430-9. PubMed ID: 15373006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interrater reliability of a movement impairment-based classification system for lumbar spine syndromes in patients with chronic low back pain.
    Trudelle-Jackson E; Sarvaiya-Shah SA; Wang SS
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2008 Jun; 38(6):371-6. PubMed ID: 18515957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interrater reliability of judgments of the centralization phenomenon and status change during movement testing in patients with low back pain.
    Fritz JM; Delitto A; Vignovic M; Busse RG
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2000 Jan; 81(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 10638877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of a treatment-based classification system for subgrouping people with low back pain.
    Henry SM; Fritz JM; Trombley AR; Bunn JY
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2012 Sep; 42(9):797-805. PubMed ID: 22677525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The inter-tester reliability of physical therapists classifying low back pain problems based on the movement system impairment classification system.
    Harris-Hayes M; Van Dillen LR
    PM R; 2009 Feb; 1(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 19627885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability of physical examination items used for classification of patients with low back pain.
    Van Dillen LR; Sahrmann SA; Norton BJ; Caldwell CA; Fleming DA; McDonnell MK; Woolsey NB
    Phys Ther; 1998 Sep; 78(9):979-88. PubMed ID: 9736895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interexaminer reliability of low back pain assessment using the McKenzie method.
    Kilpikoski S; Airaksinen O; Kankaanpää M; Leminen P; Videman T; Alen M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Apr; 27(8):E207-14. PubMed ID: 11935120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inter-examiner reliability in the assessment of low back pain (LBP) using the Kirkaldy-Willis classification (KWC).
    Bertilson BC; Bring J; Sjöblom A; Sundell K; Strender LE
    Eur Spine J; 2006 Nov; 15(11):1695-703. PubMed ID: 16435110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inter-tester reliability of discriminatory examination items for sub-classifying non-specific low back pain.
    Billis E; McCarthy CJ; Gliatis J; Gittins M; Papandreou M; Oldham JA
    J Rehabil Med; 2012 Oct; 44(10):851-7. PubMed ID: 22960671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inter-examiner reliability of a proposed decision-making treatment based classification system for low back pain patients.
    Widerström B; Olofsson N; Arvidsson I; Harms-Ringdahl K; Larsson UE
    Man Ther; 2012 Apr; 17(2):164-71. PubMed ID: 22261649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The interrater reliability of physical examination tests that may predict the outcome or suggest the need for lumbar stabilization exercises.
    Rabin A; Shashua A; Pizem K; Dar G
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2013 Feb; 43(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 23321848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inter-rater reliability of diagnostic criteria for sacroiliac joint-, disc- and facet joint pain.
    van Tilburg CWJ; Groeneweg JG; Stronks DL; Huygen FJPM
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2017; 30(3):551-557. PubMed ID: 27858686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability of novice raters in using the movement system impairment approach to classify people with low back pain.
    Henry SM; Van Dillen LR; Trombley AR; Dee JM; Bunn JY
    Man Ther; 2013 Feb; 18(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 22796388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inter-examiner reliability of a classification system for patients with non-specific low back pain.
    Vibe Fersum K; O'Sullivan PB; Kvåle A; Skouen JS
    Man Ther; 2009 Oct; 14(5):555-61. PubMed ID: 18838331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inter-tester reliability of a new diagnostic classification system for patients with non-specific low back pain.
    Petersen T; Olsen S; Laslett M; Thorsen H; Manniche C; Ekdahl C; Jacobsen S
    Aust J Physiother; 2004; 50(2):85-94. PubMed ID: 15151492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intertester reliability of a low back pain classification system.
    Wilson L; Hall H; McIntosh G; Melles T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Feb; 24(3):248-54. PubMed ID: 10025019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Low interrater reliability of examiners performing the prone instability test: a clinical test for lumbar shear instability.
    Ravenna MM; Hoffman SL; Van Dillen LR
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2011 Jun; 92(6):913-9. PubMed ID: 21621668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intertester reliability of a modified version of McKenzie's lateral shift assessments obtained on patients with low back pain.
    Donahue MS; Riddle DL; Sullivan MS
    Phys Ther; 1996 Jul; 76(7):706-16; discussion 717-26. PubMed ID: 8677276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interrater reliability of clinical examination measures for identification of lumbar segmental instability.
    Hicks GE; Fritz JM; Delitto A; Mishock J
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Dec; 84(12):1858-64. PubMed ID: 14669195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.