112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16395231)
1. Evaluation of variations in absorbed dose and image noise according to patient forms in X-ray computed tomography.
Matsubara K; Koshida K; Suzuki M; Hayakawa M; Tsujii H; Yamamoto T
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Dec; 61(12):1581-6. PubMed ID: 16395231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions.
Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of phantom diameter, kVp and scan mode upon computed tomography dose index.
Nickoloff EL; Dutta AK; Lu ZF
Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 12674240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Organ doses evaluation for chest computed tomography procedures with TL dosimeters: Comparison with Monte Carlo simulations.
Giansante L; Martins JC; Nersissian DY; Kiers KC; Kay FU; Sawamura MVY; Lee C; Gebrim EMMS; Costa PR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 20(1):308-320. PubMed ID: 30508315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Setting up computed tomography automatic tube current modulation systems.
Martin CJ; Sookpeng S
J Radiol Prot; 2016 Sep; 36(3):R74-R95. PubMed ID: 27485613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Technical Note: Evaluation of a 160-mm/256-row CT scanner for whole-heart quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging.
So A; Imai Y; Nett B; Jackson J; Nett L; Hsieh J; Wisenberg G; Teefy P; Yadegari A; Islam A; Lee TY
Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4821. PubMed ID: 27487900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Technical note: estimating absorbed doses to the thyroid in CT.
Huda W; Magill D; Spampinato MV
Med Phys; 2011 Jun; 38(6):3108-13. PubMed ID: 21815384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms.
DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; O'Daniel J; McNitt-Gray MF
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):3989-4004. PubMed ID: 16177525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Utilizing a simple CT dosimetry phantom for the comprehension of the operational characteristics of CT AEC systems.
Tsalafoutas IA; Varsamidis A; Thalassinou S; Efstathopoulos EP
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111918. PubMed ID: 24320451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of dosimetric properties among four commercial multi-detector computed tomography scanners.
Ohno T; Araki F; Onizuka R; Hatemura M; Shimonobou T; Sakamoto T; Okumura S; Ideguchi D; Honda K; Kawata K
Phys Med; 2017 Mar; 35():50-58. PubMed ID: 28254400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of the variation in CT scanner performance (image quality and Hounsfield units) with scan parameters, for image optimisation in radiotherapy treatment planning.
Davis AT; Palmer AL; Pani S; Nisbet A
Phys Med; 2018 Jan; 45():59-64. PubMed ID: 29472091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiation dose and image quality in pediatric CT: effect of technical factors and phantom size and shape.
Siegel MJ; Schmidt B; Bradley D; Suess C; Hildebolt C
Radiology; 2004 Nov; 233(2):515-22. PubMed ID: 15358847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative study of thoracic radiation doses from 64-slice cardiac CT.
Nickoloff EL; Alderson PO
Br J Radiol; 2007 Jul; 80(955):537-44. PubMed ID: 17704315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Standardizing CT lung density measure across scanner manufacturers.
Chen-Mayer HH; Fuld MK; Hoppel B; Judy PF; Sieren JP; Guo J; Lynch DA; Possolo A; Fain SB
Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):974-985. PubMed ID: 28060414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automatic exposure control in multichannel CT with tube current modulation to achieve a constant level of image noise: experimental assessment on pediatric phantoms.
Brisse HJ; Madec L; Gaboriaud G; Lemoine T; Savignoni A; Neuenschwander S; Aubert B; Rosenwald JC
Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):3018-33. PubMed ID: 17822010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Novel methods of measuring single scan dose profiles and cumulative dose in CT.
Nakonechny KD; Fallone BG; Rathee S
Med Phys; 2005 Jan; 32(1):98-109. PubMed ID: 15719960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patient-size-dependent radiation dose optimisation technique for abdominal CT examinations.
Ngaile JE; Msaki P; Kazema R
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jan; 148(2):189-201. PubMed ID: 21357583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automatic exposure control in pediatric and adult computed tomography examinations: can we estimate organ and effective dose from mean MAS reduction?
Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Oikonomou I; Damilakis J
Invest Radiol; 2011 Oct; 46(10):654-62. PubMed ID: 21673583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intraoperative cone-beam CT for guidance of head and neck surgery: Assessment of dose and image quality using a C-arm prototype.
Daly MJ; Siewerdsen JH; Moseley DJ; Jaffray DA; Irish JC
Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3767-80. PubMed ID: 17089842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Organ and effective doses in pediatric patients undergoing helical multislice computed tomography examination.
Lee C; Lee C; Staton RJ; Hintenlang DE; Arreola MM; Williams JL; Bolch WE
Med Phys; 2007 May; 34(5):1858-73. PubMed ID: 17555267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
