240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16395238)
21. A randomized study comparing the use of a pelvic lead shield during trans-radial interventions: Threefold decrease in radiation to the operator but double exposure to the patient.
Musallam A; Volis I; Dadaev S; Abergel E; Soni A; Yalonetsky S; Kerner A; Roguin A
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jun; 85(7):1164-70. PubMed ID: 25510441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Recommendations for occupational radiation protection in interventional cardiology.
Durán A; Hian SK; Miller DL; Le Heron J; Padovani R; Vano E
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jul; 82(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 23475846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cardiac catheterization: impact of face and neck shielding on new estimates of effective dose.
von Boetticher H; Lachmund J; Hoffmann W
Health Phys; 2009 Dec; 97(6):622-7. PubMed ID: 19901597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Shields and garb for decreasing radiation exposure in the cath lab.
Karatasakis A; Brilakis ES
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2018 Sep; 15(9):683-688. PubMed ID: 30092660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Thyroid dose during neurointerventional procedures: does lead shielding reduce the dose?
Shortt CP; Fanning NF; Malone L; Thornton J; Brennan P; Lee MJ
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2007; 30(5):922-7. PubMed ID: 17533529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Efficacy of the SEPARPROCATH® radiation drape to reduce radiation exposure during cardiac catheterization: A pilot comparative study.
Patet C; Ryckx N; Arroyo D; Cook S; Goy JJ
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Sep; 94(3):387-391. PubMed ID: 30773797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Is lead shielding of patients necessary during fluoroscopic procedures? A study based on kyphoplasty.
Smith JR; Marsh RM; Silosky MS
Skeletal Radiol; 2018 Jan; 47(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 28821928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Significant reduction of radiation exposure to operator and staff during cardiac interventions by analysis of radiation leakage and improved lead shielding.
Kuon E; Schmitt M; Dahm JB
Am J Cardiol; 2002 Jan; 89(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11779521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The influence of angiography table shields and height on patient and angiographer irradiation during interventional radiology procedures.
d'Othée BJ; Lin PJ
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2007; 30(3):448-54. PubMed ID: 17278031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effective use of radiation shields to minimize operator dose during invasive cardiology procedures.
Fetterly KA; Magnuson DJ; Tannahill GM; Hindal MD; Mathew V
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Oct; 4(10):1133-9. PubMed ID: 22017940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Reduction of operator radiation dose by a pelvic lead shield during cardiac catheterization by radial access: comparison with femoral access.
Lange HW; von Boetticher H
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Apr; 5(4):445-9. PubMed ID: 22516403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of novel X-ray protective eyewear in reducing the eye dose to interventional radiology physicians.
Endo M; Haga Y; Sota M; Tanaka A; Otomo K; Murabayashi Y; Abe M; Kaga Y; Inaba Y; Suzuki M; Meguro T; Chida K
J Radiat Res; 2021 May; 62(3):414-419. PubMed ID: 33839782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A novel complete radiation protection system eliminates physician radiation exposure and leaded aprons.
Fattal P; Goldstein JA
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jul; 82(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 22926976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Radiation exposure benefit of a lead cap in invasive cardiology.
Kuon E; Birkel J; Schmitt M; Dahm JB
Heart; 2003 Oct; 89(10):1205-10. PubMed ID: 12975420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Reduction of scatter radiation during transradial percutaneous coronary angiography: a randomized trial using a lead-free radiation shield.
Politi L; Biondi-Zoccai G; Nocetti L; Costi T; Monopoli D; Rossi R; Sgura F; Modena MG; Sangiorgi GM
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Jan; 79(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 21520391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of novel disposable, light-weight radiation protection devices in an interventional radiology setting: a randomized controlled trial.
Uthoff H; Peña C; West J; Contreras F; Benenati JF; Katzen BT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Apr; 200(4):915-20. PubMed ID: 23521470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effectiveness of radiation protection systems in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: a comparative study.
Cammann VL; Schweiger V; Cieslik M; Seifert B; Gilhofer T; Koleva I; Würdinger M; Candreva A; Gajic M; Michel J; Jakob P; Stehli J; Stähli B; Templin C; Gotschy A
Clin Res Cardiol; 2023 May; 112(5):605-613. PubMed ID: 36646858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Radiation Exposure Among Scrub Technologists and Nurse Circulators During Cardiac Catheterization: The Impact of Accessory Lead Shields.
Madder RD; LaCombe A; VanOosterhout S; Mulder A; Elmore M; Parker JL; Jacoby ME; Wohns D
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jan; 11(2):206-212. PubMed ID: 29102573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of pulsed progressive fluoroscopy on reduction of radiation dose in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.
Holmes DR; Wondrow MA; Gray JE; Vetter RJ; Fellows JL; Julsrud PR
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1990 Jan; 15(1):159-62. PubMed ID: 2295727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Using a sterile disposable protective surgical drape for reduction of radiation exposure to interventionalists.
King JN; Champlin AM; Kelsey CA; Tripp DA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jan; 178(1):153-7. PubMed ID: 11756110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
