221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16395369)
1. Marginal adaptation of different types of all-ceramic partial coverage restorations after exposure to an artificial mouth.
Stappert CF; Denner N; Gerds T; Strub JR
Br Dent J; 2005 Dec; 199(12):779-83; discussion 777. PubMed ID: 16395369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of mouth-motion fatigue and thermal cycling on the marginal accuracy of partial coverage restorations made of various dental materials.
Stappert CF; Chitmongkolsuk S; Silva NR; Att W; Strub JR
Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1248-57. PubMed ID: 18395785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. All-ceramic partial coverage premolar restorations. Cavity preparation design, reliability and fracture resistance after fatigue.
Stappert CF; Guess PC; Gerds T; Strub JR
Am J Dent; 2005 Aug; 18(4):275-80. PubMed ID: 16296437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Marginal accuracy of press-ceramic veneers influenced by preparation design and fatigue.
Stappert CF; Ozden U; Att W; Gerds T; Strub JR
Am J Dent; 2007 Dec; 20(6):380-4. PubMed ID: 18269129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. All-ceramic partial coverage restorations on natural molars. Masticatory fatigue loading and fracture resistance.
Stappert CF; Guess PC; Chitmongkolsuk S; Gerds T; Strub JR
Am J Dent; 2007 Feb; 20(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 17380803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Marginal and internal fit of heat pressed versus CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic onlays after exposure to thermo-mechanical fatigue.
Guess PC; Vagkopoulou T; Zhang Y; Wolkewitz M; Strub JR
J Dent; 2014 Feb; 42(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 24161516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic fatigue and fracture resistance of non-retentive all-ceramic full-coverage molar restorations. Influence of ceramic material and preparation design.
Clausen JO; Abou Tara M; Kern M
Dent Mater; 2010 Jun; 26(6):533-8. PubMed ID: 20181388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marginal adaptation of all-ceramic crowns on implant abutments.
Att W; Hoischen T; Gerds T; Strub JR
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Dec; 10(4):218-25. PubMed ID: 18241217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Marginal gap, internal fit, and fracture load of leucite-reinforced ceramic inlays fabricated by CEREC inLab and hot-pressed techniques.
Keshvad A; Hooshmand T; Asefzadeh F; Khalilinejad F; Alihemmati M; Van Noort R
J Prosthodont; 2011 Oct; 20(7):535-40. PubMed ID: 21806704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. All-ceramic partial coverage restorations--midterm results of a 5-year prospective clinical splitmouth study.
Guess PC; Strub JR; Steinhart N; Wolkewitz M; Stappert CF
J Dent; 2009 Aug; 37(8):627-37. PubMed ID: 19477570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the marginal fit of pressable ceramic to metal ceramic restorations.
Holden JE; Goldstein GR; Hittelman EL; Clark EA
J Prosthodont; 2009 Dec; 18(8):645-8. PubMed ID: 19682215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marginal adaptation of three different zirconium dioxide three-unit fixed dental prostheses.
Att W; Komine F; Gerds T; Strub JR
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):239-47. PubMed ID: 19328277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture load and marginal fit of shrinkage-free ZrSiO4 all-ceramic crowns after chewing simulation.
Okutan M; Heydecke G; Butz F; Strub JR
J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Nov; 33(11):827-32. PubMed ID: 17002742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Masticatory fatigue, fracture resistance, and marginal discrepancy of ceramic partial crowns with and without coverage of compromised cusps.
Stappert CF; Abe P; Kurths V; Gerds T; Strub JR
J Adhes Dent; 2008 Feb; 10(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 18389735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation.
Gonzalo E; Suárez MJ; Serrano B; Lozano JF
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):378-84. PubMed ID: 19961996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of a new experimental all-ceramic system before and after cementation.
Wolfart S; Wegner SM; Al-Halabi A; Kern M
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(6):587-92. PubMed ID: 14714835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro evaluation of fit of adhesively luted ceramic inlays.
Audenino G; Bresciano ME; Bassi F; Carossa S
Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(4):342-7. PubMed ID: 10635204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays fabricated with two systems: two-year clinical follow up.
Coelho Santos MJ; Mondelli RF; Lauris JR; Navarro MF
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 15088722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Marginal accuracy of pressed ceramic full veneers with different preparation techniques before and after simulated jaw movement].
Stappert CF; Derks J; Gerds T; Strub JR
Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2007; 117(5):474-82. PubMed ID: 17557642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Finishing and polishing of indirect composite and ceramic inlays in-vivo: occlusal surfaces.
Jung M; Wehlen O; Klimek J
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 15088723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
