These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16395676)

  • 1. Improvement of statistical potentials and threading score functions using information maximization.
    Solis AD; Rackovsky S
    Proteins; 2006 Mar; 62(4):892-908. PubMed ID: 16395676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Information and discrimination in pairwise contact potentials.
    Solis AD; Rackovsky S
    Proteins; 2008 May; 71(3):1071-87. PubMed ID: 18004788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Empirical potential function for simplified protein models: combining contact and local sequence-structure descriptors.
    Zhang J; Chen R; Liang J
    Proteins; 2006 Jun; 63(4):949-60. PubMed ID: 16477624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A consistent set of statistical potentials for quantifying local side-chain and backbone interactions.
    Fang Q; Shortle D
    Proteins; 2005 Jul; 60(1):90-6. PubMed ID: 15852305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Absolute quality evaluation of protein model structures using statistical potentials with respect to the native and reference states.
    Shirota M; Ishida T; Kinoshita K
    Proteins; 2011 May; 79(5):1550-63. PubMed ID: 21365682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Protein structure prediction by threading. Why it works and why it does not.
    Mirny LA; Shakhnovich EI
    J Mol Biol; 1998 Oct; 283(2):507-26. PubMed ID: 9769221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistical significance of hierarchical multi-body potentials based on Delaunay tessellation and their application in sequence-structure alignment.
    Munson PJ; Singh RK
    Protein Sci; 1997 Jul; 6(7):1467-81. PubMed ID: 9232648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using a hydrophobic contact potential to evaluate native and near-native folds generated by molecular dynamics simulations.
    Huang ES; Subbiah S; Tsai J; Levitt M
    J Mol Biol; 1996 Apr; 257(3):716-25. PubMed ID: 8648635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimally informative backbone structural propensities in proteins.
    Solis AD; Rackovsky S
    Proteins; 2002 Aug; 48(3):463-86. PubMed ID: 12112672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Local interactions in protein folding determined through an inverse folding model.
    Bastolla U; Porto M; Ortíz AR
    Proteins; 2008 Apr; 71(1):278-99. PubMed ID: 17932940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fold recognition with minimal gaps.
    Chen W; Mirny L; Shakhnovich EI
    Proteins; 2003 Jun; 51(4):531-43. PubMed ID: 12784212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Global optimum protein threading with gapped alignment and empirical pair score functions.
    Lathrop RH; Smith TF
    J Mol Biol; 1996 Feb; 255(4):641-65. PubMed ID: 8568903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Derivation of protein-specific pair potentials based on weak sequence fragment similarity.
    Skolnick J; Kolinski A; Ortiz A
    Proteins; 2000 Jan; 38(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 10651034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Protein fold recognition score functions: unusual construction strategies.
    Ayers DJ; Huber T; Torda AE
    Proteins; 1999 Sep; 36(4):454-61. PubMed ID: 10450087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sequence-dependent conformational energy of DNA derived from molecular dynamics simulations: toward understanding the indirect readout mechanism in protein-DNA recognition.
    Araúzo-Bravo MJ; Fujii S; Kono H; Ahmad S; Sarai A
    J Am Chem Soc; 2005 Nov; 127(46):16074-89. PubMed ID: 16287294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Native atomic burials, supplemented by physically motivated hydrogen bond constraints, contain sufficient information to determine the tertiary structure of small globular proteins.
    Pereira de Araújo AF; Gomes AL; Bursztyn AA; Shakhnovich EI
    Proteins; 2008 Feb; 70(3):971-83. PubMed ID: 17847091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fragment-based local statistical potentials derived by combining an alphabet of protein local structures with secondary structures and solvent accessibilities.
    Li Q; Zhou C; Liu H
    Proteins; 2009 Mar; 74(4):820-36. PubMed ID: 18704928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Atomically detailed potentials to recognize native and approximate protein structures.
    Qiu J; Elber R
    Proteins; 2005 Oct; 61(1):44-55. PubMed ID: 16080157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lessons from the design of a novel atomic potential for protein folding.
    Chen WW; Shakhnovich EI
    Protein Sci; 2005 Jul; 14(7):1741-52. PubMed ID: 15987903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Averaging interaction energies over homologs improves protein fold recognition in gapless threading.
    Reva BA; Skolnick J; Finkelstein AV
    Proteins; 1999 May; 35(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 10328270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.