These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16395995)

  • 21. The use of putative placebo in active control trials: two applications in a regulatory setting.
    Durrleman S; Chaikin P
    Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(6):941-52. PubMed ID: 12627411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Testing non-inferiority of a new treatment in three-arm clinical trials with binary endpoints.
    Tang NS; Yu B; Tang ML
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Dec; 14():134. PubMed ID: 25524326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Exact unconditional inference for risk ratio in a correlated 2 x 2 table with structural zero.
    Tang NS; Tang ML
    Biometrics; 2002 Dec; 58(4):972-80. PubMed ID: 12495152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Three-sided hypothesis testing: simultaneous testing of superiority, equivalence and inferiority.
    Goeman JJ; Solari A; Stijnen T
    Stat Med; 2010 Sep; 29(20):2117-25. PubMed ID: 20658478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Non-inferiority trials: the 'at least as good as' criterion with dichotomous data.
    Laster LL; Johnson MF; Kotler ML
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1115-30. PubMed ID: 16381070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A mixed approach for proving non-inferiority in clinical trials with binary endpoints.
    Rousson V; Seifert B
    Biom J; 2008 Apr; 50(2):190-204. PubMed ID: 18311852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Methodological and statistical aspects of equivalence and non inferiority trials].
    Elie C; De Rycke Y; Jais JP; Marion-Gallois R; Landais P
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2008 Aug; 56(4):267-77. PubMed ID: 18703296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Blinded sample size reassessment in non-inferiority and equivalence trials.
    Friede T; Kieser M
    Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(6):995-1007. PubMed ID: 12627414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Use of the equivalence approach in reproductive health clinical trials.
    Piaggio G; Pinol AP
    Stat Med; 2001 Dec; 20(23):3571-7. PubMed ID: 11746338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Commentary: The debate on non-inferiority trials: 'when meta-analysis alone is not helpful'.
    Liberati A; D'Amico R
    Int J Epidemiol; 2010 Dec; 39(6):1582-3. PubMed ID: 21113051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Unconditional exact tests for equivalence or noninferiority for paired binary endpoints.
    Hsueh HM; Liu JP; Chen JJ
    Biometrics; 2001 Jun; 57(2):478-83. PubMed ID: 11414572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Binomial confidence intervals for testing non-inferiority or superiority: a practitioner's dilemma.
    Pradhan V; Evans JC; Banerjee T
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Aug; 25(4):1707-17. PubMed ID: 23912232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A framework for two-stage adaptive procedures to simultaneously test non-inferiority and superiority.
    Koyama T; Sampson AR; Gleser LJ
    Stat Med; 2005 Aug; 24(16):2439-56. PubMed ID: 15977285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Exact and approximate unconditional confidence intervals for proportion difference in the presence of incomplete data.
    Tang ML; Ling MH; Tian GL
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 19035467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A note on the conservativeness of the confidence interval approach for the selection of non-inferiority margin in the two-arm active-control trial.
    Sankoh AJ
    Stat Med; 2008 Aug; 27(19):3732-42. PubMed ID: 18407575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Modified Haybittle-Peto group sequential designs for testing superiority and non-inferiority hypotheses in clinical trials.
    Lai TL; Shih MC; Zhu G
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1149-67. PubMed ID: 16189814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. On non-inferiority margin and statistical tests in active control trials.
    Chow SC; Shao J
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1101-13. PubMed ID: 16345042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Specific statistical considerations relevant to the design and analysis of gingivitis trials demonstrating product superiority or equivalence.
    Kingman A
    J Periodontal Res; 1992 Jul; 27(4 Pt 2):378-89; discussion 390-4. PubMed ID: 1507027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessing non-inferiority of a new treatment in a three-arm clinical trial including a placebo.
    Pigeot I; Schäfer J; Röhmel J; Hauschke D
    Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 12627407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Exact unconditional tests for testing non-inferiority in matched-pairs design.
    Sidik K
    Stat Med; 2003 Jan; 22(2):265-78. PubMed ID: 12520561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.