BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16395996)

  • 1. Statistical methods for the analysis of two-arm non-inferiority trials with binary outcomes.
    Wellek S
    Biom J; 2005 Feb; 47(1):48-61; discussion 99-107. PubMed ID: 16395996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Problems with existing procedures to calculate exact unconditional P-values for non-inferiority/superiority and confidence intervals for two binomials and how to resolve them.
    Röhmel J
    Biom J; 2005 Feb; 47(1):37-47; discussion 99-107. PubMed ID: 16395995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A regulatory perspective on choice of margin and statistical inference issue in non-inferiority trials.
    Hung HM; Wang SJ; O'Neill R
    Biom J; 2005 Feb; 47(1):28-36; discussion 99-107. PubMed ID: 16395994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Choice of delta: requirements and reality--results of a systematic review.
    Lange S; Freitag G
    Biom J; 2005 Feb; 47(1):12-27; discussion 99-107. PubMed ID: 16395993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Testing superiority and non-inferiority hypotheses in active controlled clinical trials.
    Tsong Y; Zhang JJ
    Biom J; 2005 Feb; 47(1):62-74; discussion 99-107. PubMed ID: 16395997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Therapeutic equivalence--clinical issues and statistical methodology in noninferiority trials.
    Munk A; Trampisch HJ
    Biom J; 2005 Feb; 47(1):7-9; discussion 99-107. PubMed ID: 16395992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. "Testing superiority and non-inferiority hypotheses in active controlled clinical trials".
    Röhmel J; Hauschke D
    Biom J; 2006 Feb; 48(1):174-5; author reply 176. PubMed ID: 16544822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Proving non-inferiority or equivalence of two treatments with dichotomous endpoints using exact methods.
    Chan IS
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2003 Jan; 12(1):37-58. PubMed ID: 12617507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Superior safety in noninferiority trials.
    Bristol DR
    Biom J; 2005 Feb; 47(1):75-81; discussion 99-107. PubMed ID: 16395998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A unifying approach to non-inferiority, equivalence and superiority tests via multiple decision processes.
    Hirotsu C
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(3):193-203. PubMed ID: 17879327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Handling an uncertain control group event risk in non-inferiority trials: non-inferiority frontiers and the power-stabilising transformation.
    Quartagno M; Walker AS; Babiker AG; Turner RM; Parmar MKB; Copas A; White IR
    Trials; 2020 Feb; 21(1):145. PubMed ID: 32029000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-sided hypothesis testing: simultaneous testing of superiority, equivalence and inferiority.
    Goeman JJ; Solari A; Stijnen T
    Stat Med; 2010 Sep; 29(20):2117-25. PubMed ID: 20658478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Design and analysis of non-inferiority mortality trials in oncology.
    Rothmann M; Li N; Chen G; Chi GY; Temple R; Tsou HH
    Stat Med; 2003 Jan; 22(2):239-64. PubMed ID: 12520560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Blinded sample size reassessment in non-inferiority and equivalence trials.
    Friede T; Kieser M
    Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(6):995-1007. PubMed ID: 12627414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methods for assessing noninferiority with censored data.
    Freitag G
    Biom J; 2005 Feb; 47(1):88-98; discussion 99-107. PubMed ID: 16396000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tests of equivalence and non-inferiority for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired areas under ROC curves.
    Liu JP; Ma MC; Wu CY; Tai JY
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1219-38. PubMed ID: 16158400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Methodological and statistical aspects of equivalence and non inferiority trials].
    Elie C; De Rycke Y; Jais JP; Marion-Gallois R; Landais P
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2008 Aug; 56(4):267-77. PubMed ID: 18703296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testing non-inferiority of a new treatment in three-arm clinical trials with binary endpoints.
    Tang NS; Yu B; Tang ML
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Dec; 14():134. PubMed ID: 25524326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A note on the conservativeness of the confidence interval approach for the selection of non-inferiority margin in the two-arm active-control trial.
    Sankoh AJ
    Stat Med; 2008 Aug; 27(19):3732-42. PubMed ID: 18407575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Bayesian non-inferiority test for two independent binomial proportions.
    Kawasaki Y; Miyaoka E
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 23625633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.