These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16396077)

  • 1. Looking for inhibition of return in pigeons.
    Gibson BM; Juricevic I; Shettleworth SJ; Pratt J; Klein RM
    Learn Behav; 2005 Aug; 33(3):296-308. PubMed ID: 16396077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Species-specific response-topography of chickens' and pigeons' water-induced autoshaped responding.
    Ploog BO
    Behav Processes; 2014 Jul; 106():5-11. PubMed ID: 24704490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When is a choice not a choice? Pigeons fail to inhibit incorrect responses on a go/no-go midsession reversal task.
    McMillan N; Sturdy CB; Spetch ML
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Jul; 41(3):255-65. PubMed ID: 25915749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do pigeons (Columba livia) study for a test?
    Roberts WA; Feeney MC; McMillan N; MacPherson K; Musolino E; Petter M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Apr; 35(2):129-42. PubMed ID: 19364222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transfer of pigeons' matching to sample to novel sample locations.
    Lionello-DeNolf KM; Urcuioli PJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Mar; 73(2):141-61. PubMed ID: 10784006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sample-duration effects on pigeons' delayed matching as a function of predictability of duration.
    Urcuioli PJ; DeMarse TB; Lionello KM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1999 Nov; 72(3):279-97. PubMed ID: 10605100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of proximity of elements on the feature-positive effect.
    Sainsbury RS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1971 Nov; 16(3):315-25. PubMed ID: 5150042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of outcome delay on suboptimal choice.
    McDevitt MA; Pisklak JM; Spetch M; Dunn R
    Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():279-285. PubMed ID: 30394293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The sunk cost effect in pigeons and humans.
    Navarro AD; Fantino E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Jan; 83(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 15762377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stimulus-response probability and inhibition of return.
    Ivanoff J; Klein RM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Jun; 11(3):542-50. PubMed ID: 15376808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Feature predictiveness and selective attention in pigeons' categorization learning.
    Castro L; Wasserman EA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(3):231-242. PubMed ID: 29120213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Imitation of conditional discriminations in pigeons (Columba livia).
    Dorrance BR; Zentall TR
    J Comp Psychol; 2002 Sep; 116(3):277-85. PubMed ID: 12234078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. OPERANT CONTROL OF PREENING IN PIGEONS.
    HOGAN JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1964 Sep; 7(5):351-4. PubMed ID: 14218290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scaling pigeons' choice of feeds: bigger is better.
    Killeen PR; Cate H; Tran T
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Jul; 60(1):203-17. PubMed ID: 8354967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inhibition of return in static and dynamic displays.
    Christ SE; McCrae CS; Abrams RA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Mar; 9(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 12026955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Discriminative stimuli that follow the absence of reinforcement are preferred by pigeons over those that follow reinforcement.
    Friedrich AM; Clement TS; Zentall TR
    Learn Behav; 2005 Aug; 33(3):337-42. PubMed ID: 16396080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Simon effect in pigeons.
    Urcuioli PJ; Vu KP; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Feb; 134(1):93-107. PubMed ID: 15702965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Resurgence of responding after the cessation of response-independent reinforcement.
    Epstein R; Skinner BF
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1980 Oct; 77(10):6251-3. PubMed ID: 6934550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Escape from rich-to-lean transitions: Stimulus change and timeout.
    Retzlaff BJ; Parthum ET; Pitts RC; Hughes CE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Jan; 107(1):65-84. PubMed ID: 28078744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Procrastination in the pigeon: Can conditioned reinforcement increase the likelihood of human procrastination?
    Zentall TR; Case JP; Andrews DM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1952-1957. PubMed ID: 29188447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.