231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1639624)
21. The sequential encounter evaluation. A tool for quality assurance.
Bates B
Adm Radiol; 1990 Jan; 9(1):42-3. PubMed ID: 10103773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Management concepts.
Bittner R
Radiol Technol; 2006; 78(2):131-41; quiz 142-4. PubMed ID: 17119179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Setting up a quality-assurance program: issues with impact on patient care.
Virapongse C; Clore F; Walker R
Appl Radiol; 1987 Feb; 16(2):26-8, 32-3, 66. PubMed ID: 10289743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. HSJ people. Straight to the point.
Forrest E
Health Serv J; 2003 Oct; 113(5878):26-7. PubMed ID: 14601543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The use of psychophysical principles in the design of a total digital radiology department.
Seeley GW; Newell JD
Radiol Clin North Am; 1985 Jun; 23(2):341-8. PubMed ID: 3991891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Buyers' Guide supplement.
Adm Radiol; 1992 Feb; 11(2):53-4. PubMed ID: 10117446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. It's better to be on the train than under it.
Tilson E; Gibson S
Radiol Technol; 1994; 66(1):72, 71. PubMed ID: 7997532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The impact of government regulation on radiology.
Rossi RP
Radiol Manage; 1980; 2(2):22-30. PubMed ID: 10245600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessing exam quality.
Embry R
Adm Radiol; 1992 Mar; 11(3):29-31, 33, 35. PubMed ID: 10117666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Continuing reject-repeat film analysis program.
Gadeholt G; Geitung JT; Göthlin JH; Asp T
Eur J Radiol; 1989 Aug; 9(3):137-41. PubMed ID: 2509204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Medical devices and the US Food and Drug Administration: regulating the tools of radiology.
Henderson JA; Smith JJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jun; 2(6):504-10. PubMed ID: 17411867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Noninvasive electronic quality control devices for X-ray generator testing.
Health Devices; 1992 Dec; 21(12):446-8. PubMed ID: 1490860
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Rational choice of equipment for X-ray diagnostic unit].
Blinov NN
Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1998; (1):47-52. PubMed ID: 9584655
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Performance evaluation of radiologic technologists: a method for improving the communicative process.
Kettlehake JE; Malott JC
Radiol Manage; 1987; 9(2):49-51. PubMed ID: 10288781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Reducing repeat films through a total quality management approach.
Steel J; Perry J
Adm Radiol; 1992 Feb; 11(2):47-9. PubMed ID: 10117444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. A comprehensive radiology quality assurance program.
Russell Z
QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1980 Jun; 6(6):15-8. PubMed ID: 6773008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Quality, variation and staffing.
Olivi PM
Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(5):13-4. PubMed ID: 14603588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Take the next step in trend charts.
McKinney WE
Radiol Technol; 1995; 67(2):181-2. PubMed ID: 8570849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. 1994 equipment & service guide.
Adm Radiol; 1993 Dec; 12(12):32-40, 45-7, 49-64 passim. PubMed ID: 10131396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Using quality improvement techniques to make informed decisions.
Descutner MM; Adams HG
Adm Radiol; 1995 Jun; 14(6):12-3, 15-6, 19-23. PubMed ID: 10155040
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
