211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16396642)
21. Contrasting blue-on-yellow with white-on-white visual fields: Roles of visual adaptation for healthy peri- or postmenopausal women younger than 70 years of age.
Eisner A; Toomey MD; Incognito LJ; O'malley JP; Samples JR
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5605-14. PubMed ID: 17122155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency-doubling technology, tendency-oriented perimetry, SITA Standard and SITA Fast perimetry in perimetrically inexperienced individuals.
Pierre-Filho Pde T; Schimiti RB; de Vasconcellos JP; Costa VP
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Jun; 84(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 16704696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The normal age-corrected and reaction time-corrected isopter derived by semi-automated kinetic perimetry.
Vonthein R; Rauscher S; Paetzold J; Nowomiejska K; Krapp E; Hermann A; Sadowski B; Chaumette C; Wild JM; Schiefer U
Ophthalmology; 2007 Jun; 114(6):1065-72. PubMed ID: 17331580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Continuous light increment perimetry compared to full threshold strategy in glaucoma.
Wabbels BK; Diehm S; Kolling G
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2005; 15(6):722-9. PubMed ID: 16329057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Age-dependent normative values for differential luminance sensitivity in automated static perimetry using the Octopus 101.
Hermann A; Paetzold J; Vonthein R; Krapp E; Rauscher S; Schiefer U
Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Jun; 86(4):446-55. PubMed ID: 18070224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Rarebit perimetry in normal subjects: test-retest variability, learning effect, normative range, influence of optical defocus, and cataract extraction.
Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Parisi L; Brusini P
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Nov; 48(11):5320-31. PubMed ID: 17962489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Properties of staircase procedures for estimating thresholds in automated perimetry.
Johnson CA; Chauhan BC; Shapiro LR
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1992 Sep; 33(10):2966-74. PubMed ID: 1526745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Population norms for frequency doubling perimetry with uncorrected refractive error.
Ramesh SV; George R; Soni PM; Palaniappan L; Raju P; Paul PG; Ramsathish S; Vijaya L
Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jun; 84(6):496-504. PubMed ID: 17568319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Automated flicker perimetry in glaucoma using Octopus 311: a comparative study with the Humphrey Matrix.
Matsumoto C; Takada S; Okuyama S; Arimura E; Hashimoto S; Shimomura Y
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Apr; 84(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 16637839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Impact of visual impairment on measures of cognitive function for children with congenital toxoplasmosis: implications for compensatory intervention strategies.
Roizen N; Kasza K; Karrison T; Mets M; Noble AG; Boyer K; Swisher C; Meier P; Remington J; Jalbrzikowski J; McLeod R; Kipp M; Rabiah P; Chamot D; Estes R; Cezar S; Mack D; Pfiffner L; Stein M; Danis B; Patel D; Hopkins J; Holfels E; Stein L; Withers S; Cameron A; Perkins J; Heydemann P
Pediatrics; 2006 Aug; 118(2):e379-90. PubMed ID: 16864640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [FDT versus automated standard perimetry in healthy subjects].
Chiseliţa D; Ioana MC; Danielescu C; Mihaela NM
Oftalmologia; 2006; 50(3):99-104. PubMed ID: 17144515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Automated perimetry in a neuro-ophthalmologic practice.
Schindler S; McCrary JA
Ann Ophthalmol; 1981 Jun; 13(6):691-7. PubMed ID: 7258961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evidence for a learning effect in short-wavelength automated perimetry.
Wild JM; Kim LS; Pacey IE; Cunliffe IA
Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 16458091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Craniopharyngioma: ophthalmological aspects at diagnosis.
Defoort-Dhellemmes S; Moritz F; Bouacha I; Vinchon M
J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab; 2006 Apr; 19 Suppl 1():321-4. PubMed ID: 16700306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Assessment of the macula function by static perimetry, microperimetry and rarebit perimetry in patients suffering from dry age related macular degeneration].
Nowomiejska K; Oleszczuk A; Zubilewicz A; Krukowski J; Mańkowska A; Rejdak R; Zagórski Z
Klin Oczna; 2007; 109(4-6):131-4. PubMed ID: 17725269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Optimizing the use of frequency doubling technology perimetry in community vision screenings.
Nehmad L; Madonna RJ
Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jul; 85(7):559-65. PubMed ID: 18594349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Perimetric sensitivity and response variability in glaucoma with single-stimulus automated perimetry and multiple-stimulus perimetry with verbal feedback.
Miranda MA; Henson DB
Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 86(2):202-6. PubMed ID: 18005269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Selective perimetry in glaucoma diagnosis.
Sakata LM; DeLeón-Ortega J; Girkin CA
Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2007 Mar; 18(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 17301612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [A comparative analysis of standard automated perimetry and short wavelength automated perimetry in early diagnosis of glaucoma].
Chiseliţă D; Crenguţa MI; Danielescu C; Mihaela NM
Oftalmologia; 2006; 50(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 16927766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
