These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1639668)

  • 1. Event-related potentials in the dual task paradigm: P300 discriminates engaging and non-engaging films when film-viewing is the primary task.
    Rosenfeld JP; Bhat K; Miltenberger A; Johnson M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1992 May; 12(3):221-32. PubMed ID: 1639668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interaction of oddball probability and primary task type on P300 in the dual-task paradigm.
    Willard J; Johnson M; Rosenfeld JP
    Biofeedback Self Regul; 1994 Mar; 19(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 8167161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of education level on design-induced N170 and P300 components of event related potentials in the human brain.
    Begum T; Reza F; Ahmed I; Abdullah JM
    J Integr Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 13(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 24738540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. N100 and P300 amplitude to Go and No-Go variants of the auditory oddball in siblings discordant for schizophrenia.
    Sumich A; Kumari V; Dodd P; Ettinger U; Hughes C; Zachariah E; Sharma T
    Schizophr Res; 2008 Jan; 98(1-3):265-77. PubMed ID: 18022352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. P300 component of event-related potentials in passive tasks.
    Iwanami A; Kamijima K; Yoshizawa J
    Int J Neurosci; 1996 Feb; 84(1-4):121-6. PubMed ID: 8707473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Latency variability of the components of auditory event-related potentials to infrequent stimuli in aging, Alzheimer-type dementia, and depression.
    Patterson JV; Michalewski HJ; Starr A
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1988; 71(6):450-60. PubMed ID: 2460326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Task difficulty, probability, and inter-stimulus interval as determinants of P300 from auditory stimuli.
    Polich J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1987 Jul; 68(4):311-20. PubMed ID: 2439311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Faster P300 latency after smoking in visual but not auditory oddball tasks.
    Houlihan ME; Pritchard WS; Robinson JH
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1996 Feb; 123(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 8833416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual augmenting/reducing and P300 in autistic children.
    Pritchard WS; Raz N; August GJ
    J Autism Dev Disord; 1987 Jun; 17(2):231-42. PubMed ID: 3610997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dual-task repetition alters event-related brain potentials and task performance.
    Kida T; Kaneda T; Nishihira Y
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Jun; 123(6):1123-30. PubMed ID: 22030141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. No decrement in visual P300 amplitude during extended performance of the oddball task.
    Pritchard WS; Brandt ME; Shappell SA; O'Dell TJ; Barratt ES
    Int J Neurosci; 1986 Jun; 29(3-4):199-204. PubMed ID: 3733323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. P300 from a single-stimulus paradigm: passive versus active tasks and stimulus modality.
    Mertens R; Polich J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1997 Nov; 104(6):488-97. PubMed ID: 9402891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of complexity of visual distracters on attention and information processing speed reflected in auditory p300.
    Wilson MJ; Harkrider AW; King KA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):480-8. PubMed ID: 22343547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes in P300 amplitude during an active standard auditory oddball task.
    Lindín M; Zurrón M; Díaz F
    Biol Psychol; 2004 Apr; 66(2):153-67. PubMed ID: 15041137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Resource allocation and somatosensory P300 amplitude during dual task: effects of tracking speed and predictability of tracking direction.
    Kida T; Nishihira Y; Hatta A; Wasaka T; Tazoe T; Sakajiri Y; Nakata H; Kaneda T; Kuroiwa K; Akiyama S; Sakamoto M; Kamijo K; Higashiura T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 115(11):2616-28. PubMed ID: 15465451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. P300, probability, and the three-tone paradigm.
    Katayama J; Polich J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1996 Nov; 100(6):555-62. PubMed ID: 8980420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Target-to-target interval, intensity, and P300 from an auditory single-stimulus task.
    Gonsalvez CJ; Barry RJ; Rushby JA; Polich J
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Mar; 44(2):245-50. PubMed ID: 17343708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The P300 wave of the human event-related potential.
    Picton TW
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 1992 Oct; 9(4):456-79. PubMed ID: 1464675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of jogging on P300 event related potentials.
    Nakamura Y; Nishimoto K; Akamatu M; Takahashi M; Maruyama A
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Mar; 39(2):71-4. PubMed ID: 10207674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of self-evaluation on the P300 event-related potential.
    Alexander JE; Alexander RG; Crowson B; Machan K; Hall CA; Lockwood D; Godinez D
    Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Apr; 100(2):409-20. PubMed ID: 15974352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.