These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16397099)

  • 21. Environmental and biodiversity effects of different beef production systems.
    Angerer V; Sabia E; König von Borstel U; Gauly M
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Jul; 289():112523. PubMed ID: 33839605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Environmental impact evaluation of feeds prepared from food residues using life cycle assessment.
    Ogino A; Hirooka H; Ikeguchi A; Tanaka Y; Waki M; Yokoyama H; Kawashima T
    J Environ Qual; 2007; 36(4):1061-8. PubMed ID: 17526885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Avoided deforestation as a greenhouse gas mitigation tool: economic issues.
    Sohngen B; Beach RH; Andrasko K
    J Environ Qual; 2008; 37(4):1368-75. PubMed ID: 18574167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. EU strategies and policies on soil and waste management to offset greenhouse gas emissions.
    Marmo L
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(4):685-9. PubMed ID: 18042371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Photocatalytic TiO2 coating-to reduce ammonia and greenhouse gases concentration and emission from animal husbandries.
    Guarino M; Costa A; Porro M
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 May; 99(7):2650-8. PubMed ID: 17574843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An operational method for the evaluation of resource use and environmental impacts of dairy farms by life cycle assessment.
    van der Werf HM; Kanyarushoki C; Corson MS
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Aug; 90(11):3643-52. PubMed ID: 19664872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Carbon Navigator: a decision support tool to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from livestock production systems.
    Murphy P; Crosson P; O'Brien D; Schulte RP
    Animal; 2013 Jun; 7 Suppl 2():427-36. PubMed ID: 23739484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Farm-specific carbon footprinting to the farm gate for agricultural co-products using the OVERSEER® model.
    Wheeler DM; Ledgard SF; Boyes M
    Animal; 2013 Jun; 7 Suppl 2():437-43. PubMed ID: 23739485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Application of food industry waste to agricultural soils mitigates green house gas emissions.
    Rashid MT; Voroney RP; Khalid M
    Bioresour Technol; 2010 Jan; 101(2):485-90. PubMed ID: 19765979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Diversification not specialization reduces global and local environmental burdens from livestock production.
    Soteriades AD; Foskolos A; Styles D; Gibbons JM
    Environ Int; 2019 Nov; 132():104837. PubMed ID: 31450105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from 10 biogas plants within the agricultural sector.
    Liebetrau J; Reinelt T; Clemens J; Hafermann C; Friehe J; Weiland P
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(6):1370-9. PubMed ID: 23508164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The relevance of methane emissions from beef production and the challenges of the Argentinean beef production platform.
    Rearte DH; Pordomingo AJ
    Meat Sci; 2014 Nov; 98(3):355-60. PubMed ID: 25027797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The impact of economic activity in Asturias on greenhouse gas emissions: consequences for environmental policy within the Kyoto Protocol framework.
    Argüelles M; Benavides C; Junquera B
    J Environ Manage; 2006 Nov; 81(3):249-64. PubMed ID: 16556480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparative analysis of vehicle-related greenhouse gas emissions between organic and conventional dairy production.
    Aggestam V; Buick J
    J Dairy Res; 2017 Aug; 84(3):360-369. PubMed ID: 28831965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Afforestation: Replacing livestock emissions with carbon sequestration.
    Duffy C; O'Donoghue C; Ryan M; Styles D; Spillane C
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Jun; 264():110523. PubMed ID: 32250923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of slaughter age on environmental efficiency on beef cattle in marginal area including soil carbon sequestration: A case of study in Italian Alpine area.
    Sabia E; Zanon T; Braghieri A; Pacelli C; Angerer V; Gauly M
    Sci Total Environ; 2024 Mar; 918():170798. PubMed ID: 38336055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Measures of the EU Agri-Environmental Protection Scheme (GAEPS) and their impacts on the visual acceptability of Finnish agricultural landscapes.
    Tahvanainen L; Ihalainen M; Hietala-Koivu R; Kolehmainen O; Tyrväinen L; Nousiainen I; Helenius J
    J Environ Manage; 2002 Nov; 66(3):213-27. PubMed ID: 12448401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. How effective is greening policy in reducing GHG emissions from agriculture? Evidence from Italy.
    Solazzo R; Donati M; Tomasi L; Arfini F
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Dec; 573():1115-1124. PubMed ID: 27694042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Deforestation and greenhouse gas emissions associated with fuelwood consumption of the brick making industry in Sudan.
    Alam SA; Starr M
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 Jan; 407(2):847-52. PubMed ID: 18992919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An unconventional approach to evaluating the environmental role of a productive system: An environmental assessment of beef farms in North-West Italy.
    Biagini D; Betta M
    Sci Total Environ; 2024 Nov; 953():176100. PubMed ID: 39255937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.