354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16397648)
1. [From a manuscript to an article in Tidsskriftet].
Ringnes A
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Jan; 126(1):18-9. PubMed ID: 16397648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Tidsskriftet, peer review and medical publishing].
Bjørheim J; Frich JC; Gjersvik P; Jacobsen G; Swensen E
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Jan; 126(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 16397649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rejection: giving it and taking it.
Taylor D
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2008 Oct; 1(4):275. PubMed ID: 19627792
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Criticism with only little inhibitions?].
Henriksen P
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Sep; 128(18):2087-8; discussion 2088. PubMed ID: 18846128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Criticism without inhibitions].
Aavitsland P
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Jun; 128(12):1377. PubMed ID: 18552894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [New, true and interesting].
Haug C
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Sep; 126(17):2237. PubMed ID: 16967058
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [From paper to Internet-based manuscript submission].
Schroeder TV; Kitaj T
Ugeskr Laeger; 2005 Jan; 167(1):25. PubMed ID: 15675159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection.
Gupta P; Kaur G; Sharma B; Shah D; Choudhury P
Indian Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 43(6):479-89. PubMed ID: 16820657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [A year with New England Journal of Medicine].
Bretthauer M
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Oct; 129(19):1971. PubMed ID: 19823197
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Online submission of manuscripts for "The Orthopedist."].
Orthopade; 2012 Oct; 41(10):799. PubMed ID: 23052845
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Big and small research fraud].
Nylenna M
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Aug; 126(16):2089. PubMed ID: 16932774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Is Tidsskriftet's publishing time too long?].
Sellevold OF; Bratlid D
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2010 Jun; 130(12):1228-31. PubMed ID: 20567273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [That is why your article was rejected].
Johansen K
Ugeskr Laeger; 2009 Mar; 171(12):1015; author reply 1015. PubMed ID: 19301477
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. All the lonely people: by Caveman.
J Cell Sci; 2004 Aug; 117(Pt 17):3705-6. PubMed ID: 15286170
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Peer review of scientific manuscripts should be open and referees' bias should be accounted for].
Thörn A
Lakartidningen; 2004 Oct; 101(44):3458. PubMed ID: 15560663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [How strict should editors be? Nothing is done for the sake of errors].
Eklund J
Lakartidningen; 2004 Dec; 101(51-52):4250. PubMed ID: 15658596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Why manuscript formatting can reduce you to a whiny 4-year-old.
Overstreet K
J Spec Pediatr Nurs; 2010 Jan; 15(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 20074108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Should the Ugeskrift take in secondary publications without independent peer reviews?].
Hjøllund NH
Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 Aug; 168(33):2687; author reply 2687. PubMed ID: 16953547
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Authors should know who reviewed their articles].
Sonnsjö B
Lakartidningen; 2005 Aug 22-28; 102(34):2333. PubMed ID: 16167638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Authors should know who reviewed their articles].
Johansson BH
Lakartidningen; 2005 Jul 11-24; 102(28-29):2094; author reply 2094. PubMed ID: 16097188
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
