These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16397860)

  • 1. On estimation of the variance in Cochran-Armitage trend tests for genetic association using case-control studies.
    Zheng G; Gastwirth JL
    Stat Med; 2006 Sep; 25(18):3150-9. PubMed ID: 16397860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A powerful method of combining measures of association and Hardy-Weinberg disequilibrium for fine-mapping in case-control studies.
    Song K; Elston RC
    Stat Med; 2006 Jan; 25(1):105-26. PubMed ID: 16220513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving power for testing genetic association in case-control studies by reducing the alternative space.
    Joo J; Kwak M; Zheng G
    Biometrics; 2010 Mar; 66(1):266-76. PubMed ID: 19397584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of SNP genotyping errors on the power of the Cochran-Armitage linear trend test for case/control association studies.
    Ahn K; Haynes C; Kim W; Fleur RS; Gordon D; Finch SJ
    Ann Hum Genet; 2007 Mar; 71(Pt 2):249-61. PubMed ID: 17096677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of diagnostic error on testing genetic association in case-control studies.
    Zheng G; Tian X
    Stat Med; 2005 Mar; 24(6):869-82. PubMed ID: 15568195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of two-phase analyses for case-control genetic association studies.
    Zheng G; Meyer M; Li W; Yang Y
    Stat Med; 2008 Oct; 27(24):5054-75. PubMed ID: 18570272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of max and min scores for trend tests for association when the genetic model is unknown.
    Zheng G
    Stat Med; 2003 Aug; 22(16):2657-66. PubMed ID: 12898550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Order-restricted scores test for the evaluation of population-based case-control studies when the genetic model is unknown.
    Hothorn LA; Hothorn T
    Biom J; 2009 Aug; 51(4):659-69. PubMed ID: 19650055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adaptive two-stage analysis of genetic association in case-control designs.
    Zheng G; Song K; Elston RC
    Hum Hered; 2007; 63(3-4):175-86. PubMed ID: 17310127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robust Mantel-Haenszel test under genetic model uncertainty allowing for covariates in case-control association studies.
    Zang Y; Fung WK
    Genet Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 35(7):695-705. PubMed ID: 22009791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robust genomic control and robust delta centralization tests for case-control association studies.
    Zang Y; Zhang H; Yang Y; Zheng G
    Hum Hered; 2007; 63(3-4):187-95. PubMed ID: 17310128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Power and sample size evaluation for the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel mean score (Wilcoxon rank sum) test and the Cochran-Armitage test for trend.
    Lachin JM
    Stat Med; 2011 Nov; 30(25):3057-66. PubMed ID: 22006667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cochran-Armitage test versus logistic regression in the analysis of genetic association studies.
    Wellek S; Ziegler A
    Hum Hered; 2012; 73(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 22212245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficiency robust statistics for genetic linkage and association studies under genetic model uncertainty.
    Joo J; Kwak M; Chen Z; Zheng G
    Stat Med; 2010 Jan; 29(1):158-80. PubMed ID: 19918942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maximizing association statistics over genetic models.
    González JR; Carrasco JL; Dudbridge F; Armengol L; Estivill X; Moreno V
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 32(3):246-54. PubMed ID: 18228557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genomic control for association studies under various genetic models.
    Zheng G; Freidlin B; Li Z; Gastwirth JL
    Biometrics; 2005 Mar; 61(1):186-92. PubMed ID: 15737092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of population substructure on trend tests for genetic case-control association studies.
    Zheng G; Li Z; Gail MH; Gastwirth JL
    Biometrics; 2010 Mar; 66(1):196-204. PubMed ID: 19432788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Omnibus permutation tests of the association of an ensemble of genetic markers with disease in case-control studies.
    Potter DM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Jul; 30(5):438-46. PubMed ID: 16671109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Upward bias in odds ratio estimates from genome-wide association studies.
    Garner C
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 May; 31(4):288-95. PubMed ID: 17266119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Statistical power of association using the extreme discordant phenotype design.
    Zhang G; Nebert DW; Chakraborty R; Jin L
    Pharmacogenet Genomics; 2006 Jun; 16(6):401-13. PubMed ID: 16708049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.