These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16398766)

  • 1. The costs to the NHS of multiple births after IVF treatment in the UK.
    Ledger WL; Anumba D; Marlow N; Thomas CM; Wilson EC;
    BJOG; 2006 Jan; 113(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 16398766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Universal coverage of IVF pays off.
    Vélez MP; Connolly MP; Kadoch IJ; Phillips S; Bissonnette F
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1313-9. PubMed ID: 24706002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost analysis of singleton versus twin pregnancies after in vitro fertilization.
    Lukassen HG; Schönbeck Y; Adang EM; Braat DD; Zielhuis GA; Kremer JA
    Fertil Steril; 2004 May; 81(5):1240-6. PubMed ID: 15136084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of cross-border IVF on maternal and neonatal outcomes in multiple pregnancies: Experience from a UK fetal medicine service.
    Jaspal R; Prior T; Denton J; Salim R; Banerjee J; Christoph Lees
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Jul; 238():63-67. PubMed ID: 31112853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Costs of NHS maternity care for women with multiple pregnancy compared with high-risk and low-risk singleton pregnancy.
    Mistry H; Dowie R; Young TA; Gardiner HM;
    BJOG; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1104-12. PubMed ID: 17655730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modified natural cycle versus controlled ovarian hyperstimulation IVF: a cost-effectiveness evaluation of three simulated treatment scenarios.
    Groen H; Tonch N; Simons AH; van der Veen F; Hoek A; Land JA
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Dec; 28(12):3236-46. PubMed ID: 24166594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is IVF-served two different ways-more cost-effective than IUI with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation?
    Tjon-Kon-Fat RI; Bensdorp AJ; Bossuyt PM; Koks C; Oosterhuis GJ; Hoek A; Hompes P; Broekmans FJ; Verhoeve HR; de Bruin JP; van Golde R; Repping S; Cohlen BJ; Lambers MD; van Bommel PF; Slappendel E; Perquin D; Smeenk J; Pelinck MJ; Gianotten J; Hoozemans DA; Maas JW; Groen H; Eijkemans MJ; van der Veen F; Mol BW; van Wely M
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Oct; 30(10):2331-9. PubMed ID: 26269539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. IVF with planned single-embryo transfer versus IUI with ovarian stimulation in couples with unexplained subfertility: an economic analysis.
    van Rumste MM; Custers IM; van Wely M; Koks CA; van Weering HG; Beckers NG; Scheffer GJ; Broekmans FJ; Hompes PG; Mochtar MH; van der Veen F; Mol BW
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Mar; 28(3):336-42. PubMed ID: 24456703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2011.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2014 Nov; 63(10):1-28. PubMed ID: 25412164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance — United States, 2012.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Warner L; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2015 Aug; 64(6):1-29. PubMed ID: 26270152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness of a mild compared with a standard strategy for IVF: a randomized comparison using cumulative term live birth as the primary endpoint.
    Polinder S; Heijnen EM; Macklon NS; Habbema JD; Fauser BJ; Eijkemans MJ
    Hum Reprod; 2008 Feb; 23(2):316-23. PubMed ID: 18033807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost of assisted reproductive technologies for a health maintenance organization.
    Hidlebaugh DA; Thompson IE; Berger MJ
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Sep; 42(9):570-4. PubMed ID: 9336753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance -- United States, 2010.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford S; Anderson JE; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2013 Dec; 62(9):1-24. PubMed ID: 24304902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - 
United States, 2013.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Warner L; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2015 Dec; 64(11):1-25. PubMed ID: 26633040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hospital costs during the first 5 years of life for multiples compared with singletons born after IVF or ICSI.
    van Heesch MM; Evers JL; van der Hoeven MA; Dumoulin JC; van Beijsterveldt CE; Bonsel GJ; Dykgraaf RH; van Goudoever JB; Koopman-Esseboom C; Nelen WL; Steiner K; Tamminga P; Tonch N; Torrance HL; Dirksen CD
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Jun; 30(6):1481-90. PubMed ID: 25840426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Two cycles with single embryo transfer versus one cycle with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial.
    Lukassen HG; Braat DD; Wetzels AM; Zielhuis GA; Adang EM; Scheenjes E; Kremer JA
    Hum Reprod; 2005 Mar; 20(3):702-8. PubMed ID: 15618254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost efficiency of reducing multiple births.
    Collins J
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2007; 15 Suppl 3():35-9. PubMed ID: 18598607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Economic implications of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology embryo transfer guidelines: healthcare dollars saved by reducing iatrogenic triplets.
    Lee MS; Evans BT; Stern AD; Hornstein MD
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Jul; 106(1):189-195.e3. PubMed ID: 27037461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multiple gestations/pregnancies from IVF process in a fertility center in Nigeria, 2009-2011: implementing policy towards fewer (double and single) embryo transfer.
    Olukoya OY; Okeke CC; Kemi AI; Ogbeche RO; Adewusi AJ; Ashiru OA
    Nig Q J Hosp Med; 2012; 22(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 23175902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing long-run economic benefits attributed to an IVF-conceived singleton based on projected lifetime net tax contributions in the UK.
    Connolly M; Gallo F; Hoorens S; Ledger W
    Hum Reprod; 2009 Mar; 24(3):626-32. PubMed ID: 19056775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.