These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16400131)

  • 21. NIH panel to monitor peer review in action.
    Taylor R
    Nature; 1995 Jun; 375(6531):438. PubMed ID: 7777040
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Peer review of research project grants by NIH study sections: report of the Committee on National Medical Policy, American Society for Clinical Investigation.
    Bondurant S
    Clin Res; 1977 Dec; 25(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 10304718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Federal work force. Can outsiders do better in managing NIH grants?
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2003 Mar; 299(5614):1823. PubMed ID: 12649448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. NIH budget. Peer review under stress.
    Miller G; Couzin J
    Science; 2007 Apr; 316(5823):358-9. PubMed ID: 17446364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Enhancing NIH grant peer review: a broader perspective.
    Bonetta L
    Cell; 2008 Oct; 135(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 18957192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Don't create a climate of fear.
    Nature; 2003 Oct; 425(6961):885. PubMed ID: 14586426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. American Idol and NIH Grant Review.
    Pagano M
    Cell; 2006 Aug; 126(4):637-8. PubMed ID: 16923379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. NIH peer review system: facts and figures on study sections add up to trouble.
    Fed Proc; 1978 Aug; 37(10):1a-4a. PubMed ID: 581073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Biomedical policy. NIH wins an exemption from HHS peer-review overhaul.
    Marshall E
    Science; 2001 Aug; 293(5533):1234. PubMed ID: 11509695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Making research accessible: National Institutes of Health (NIH) public access and PNAS open access policies.
    Cozzarelli NR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2005 Apr; 102(15):5303. PubMed ID: 15809413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Peer review. NIH urged to focus on new ideas, new applicants.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5867):1169. PubMed ID: 18309051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. NIH rating system.
    Gibson AR
    Science; 1996 Aug; 273(5275):562. PubMed ID: 8701302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Two facets of peer review and the proper role of study sections.
    Lenard J
    Account Res; 2006; 13(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 17124762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A metareview at the NIH.
    Nat Med; 2008 Apr; 14(4):351. PubMed ID: 18391922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Social choice at NIH: the principle of complementarity.
    Kaplan D
    FASEB J; 2011 Nov; 25(11):3763-4. PubMed ID: 21798955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Support for the NIH public access policy.
    Rogawski MA; Suber P
    Science; 2006 Sep; 313(5793):1572. PubMed ID: 16973859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Revamp for NIH grants.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2008 Feb; 451(7182):1035. PubMed ID: 18305502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Shortening of NIH RO1 grant applications: your response is important.
    Nairn RS; Sweasy JB
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jan; 6(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 17157082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Changes to NIH grant system may backfire.
    Karp PD; Sherlock G; Gerlt JA; Sim I; Paulsen I; Babbitt PC; Laderoute K; Hunter L; Sternberg P; Wooley J; Bourne PE
    Science; 2008 Nov; 322(5905):1187-8. PubMed ID: 19023064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A risk worth taking.
    Nature; 2008 Oct; 455(7217):1150. PubMed ID: 18971970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.