These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16400487)
21. A comparative study of cephalometric and arch width characteristics of Class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusions. Isik F; Nalbantgil D; Sayinsu K; Arun T Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 16431898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Different manifestations of Class II Division 2 incisor retroclination: a morphologic study. Mariano Pereira P; Pinhão Ferreira A; Tavares P; Braga AC Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Mar; 143(3):310-6. PubMed ID: 23452964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Differences in dental arch morphology among adult females with untreated Class I and Class II malocclusion. Buschang PH; Stroud J; Alexander RG Eur J Orthod; 1994 Feb; 16(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 8181550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Longitudinal evaluation of dental arch asymmetry in Class II subdivision malocclusion with 3-dimensional digital models. Veli I; Yuksel B; Uysal T Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jun; 145(6):763-70. PubMed ID: 24880847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Arch-width and perimeter changes in patients with borderline Class I malocclusion treated with extractions or without extractions with air-rotor stripping. Germec-Cakan D; Taner TU; Akan S Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jun; 137(6):734.e1-7; discussion 734-5. PubMed ID: 20685525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Dental arch shape and size in Malay schoolchildren with Class II malocclusion. Banabilh SM; Rajion ZA; Samsudin R; Singh GD Aust Orthod J; 2006 Nov; 22(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 17203572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The effects of Fränkel II treatment on arch width and arch perimeter. McWade RA; Mamandras AH; Hunter WS Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Oct; 92(4):313-20. PubMed ID: 3477950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Space planning sensitivity and specificity: Royal London Space Planning and Korkhaus Analyses. Dause R; Cobourne M; McDonald F Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 20575199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. An Evaluation of Mandibular Dental and Basal Arch Dimensions in Class I and Class II Division 1 Adult Syrian Patients using Cone-beam Computed Tomography. Al-Hilal LH; Sultan K; Hajeer MY; Mahmoud G; Wanli AA J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Apr; 19(4):431-437. PubMed ID: 29728549 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of arch width, alveolar width and buccolingual inclination of teeth between Class II division 1 malocclusion and Class I occlusion. Shu R; Han X; Wang Y; Xu H; Ai D; Wang L; Wu Y; Bai D Angle Orthod; 2013 Mar; 83(2):246-52. PubMed ID: 23458279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparison of arch widths in adults with normal occlusion and adults with class II, Division 1 malocclusion. Staley RN; Stuntz WR; Peterson LC Am J Orthod; 1985 Aug; 88(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 3861102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Dental arch dimensions in oligodontia patients. Bu X; Khalaf K; Hobson RS Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):768-72. PubMed ID: 19061803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Alveolar and dental arch morphology in Angle Class II division 2 malocclusion: a comparative study. Bălan RA; Popa G; Biţă R; Fabricky M; Jivănescu A; Bratu DC Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2014; 55(3 Suppl):1093-7. PubMed ID: 25607390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Dental arch dimensions in the mixed dentition: a study of Italian children born in the 1950s and the 1990s. Defraia E; Baroni G; Marinelli A Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):446-51. PubMed ID: 16637725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Arch width after extraction and nonextraction treatment. Gianelly AA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Jan; 123(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 12532059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Maxillary expansion in Class II correction with orthopedic cervical headgear. A posteroanterior cephalometric study. Kirjavainen M; Kirjavainen T Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 12828436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Analysis of the plaster casts of Class II division 1 non-extraction patients treated with Alexander technique]. Cao T; Wei S; Zhou YH Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 48(9):518-22. PubMed ID: 24314276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Mandibular dental arch changes associated with treatment of crowding using self-ligating and conventional brackets. Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Makou M; Eliades T Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 19959610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Arch width changes in extraction and nonextraction treatment in class I patients. Aksu M; Kocadereli I Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):948-52. PubMed ID: 16448236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Arch width changes in patients with Class II division 1 malocclusion treated with maxillary first premolar extraction and non-extraction method. Shirazi S; Kachoei M; Shahvaghar-Asl N; Shirazi S; Sharghi R J Clin Exp Dent; 2016 Oct; 8(4):e403-e408. PubMed ID: 27703608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]