These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16400708)

  • 1. Propensity scores and the surgeon.
    Adamina M; Guller U; Weber WP; Oertli D
    Br J Surg; 2006 Apr; 93(4):389-94. PubMed ID: 16400708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of propensity scores should be discouraged when there is too little and too early of new surgical techniques.
    Shuhaiber JH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Mar; 135(3):713-4; author reply 714. PubMed ID: 18329509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Propensity score methods for creating covariate balance in observational studies].
    Pattanayak CW; Rubin DB; Zell ER
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 2011 Oct; 64(10):897-903. PubMed ID: 21872981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Funnel plots and their emerging application in surgery.
    Mayer EK; Bottle A; Rao C; Darzi AW; Athanasiou T
    Ann Surg; 2009 Mar; 249(3):376-83. PubMed ID: 19247021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An overview of the objectives of and the approaches to propensity score analyses.
    Heinze G; Jüni P
    Eur Heart J; 2011 Jul; 32(14):1704-8. PubMed ID: 21362706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Addressing the issue of channeling bias in observational studies with propensity scores analysis.
    Lobo FS; Wagner S; Gross CR; Schommer JC
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2006 Mar; 2(1):143-51. PubMed ID: 17138506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Weaknesses of goodness-of-fit tests for evaluating propensity score models: the case of the omitted confounder.
    Weitzen S; Lapane KL; Toledano AY; Hume AL; Mor V
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2005 Apr; 14(4):227-38. PubMed ID: 15386700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Propensity score analysis in observational studies: outcomes after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
    Johnson ML; Bush RL; Collins TC; Lin PH; Liles DR; Henderson WG; Khuri SF; Petersen LA
    Am J Surg; 2006 Sep; 192(3):336-43. PubMed ID: 16920428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of disease risk scores, propensity scores, and traditional multivariable outcome regression in the presence of multiple confounders.
    Arbogast PG; Ray WA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 174(5):613-20. PubMed ID: 21749976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Practice-based evidence research in rehabilitation: an alternative to randomized controlled trials and traditional observational studies.
    Horn SD; DeJong G; Deutscher D
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Aug; 93(8 Suppl):S127-37. PubMed ID: 22840879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Evidence-based surgery].
    Stijntjes F; Obertop H
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Sep; 152(38):2065-70. PubMed ID: 18837182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Regulatory considerations in the design of comparative observational studies using propensity scores.
    Yue LQ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(6):1272-9. PubMed ID: 23075022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Randomized trials and registries: a computer simulation to study the impact of surgeon/patient factors on outcomes.
    Weiner BK; Patel R; Noble P
    Spine J; 2008; 8(6):959-67. PubMed ID: 18243058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinician awareness and knowledge of breast cancer-related lymphedema in a large, integrated health care delivery setting.
    Tam EK; Shen L; Munneke JR; Ackerson LM; Partee PN; Somkin CP; André M; Kutner SE; Thiadens SR; Kwan ML
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Feb; 131(3):1029-38. PubMed ID: 22037785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlates of referral practices of general surgeons to plastic surgeons for mastectomy reconstruction.
    Alderman AK; Hawley ST; Waljee J; Morrow M; Katz SJ
    Cancer; 2007 May; 109(9):1715-20. PubMed ID: 17387715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving participant selection in disease management programmes: insights gained from propensity score stratification.
    Linden A; Adams JL
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):914-8. PubMed ID: 19018926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An application of propensity score matching using claims data.
    Seeger JD; Williams PL; Walker AM
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2005 Jul; 14(7):465-76. PubMed ID: 15651087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk adjustment and outcome research. Part I.
    Arcà M; Fusco D; Barone AP; Perucci CA
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2006 Sep; 7(9):682-90. PubMed ID: 16932082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surgical decision-making: integrating evidence, inference, and experience.
    Marshall JC
    Surg Clin North Am; 2006 Feb; 86(1):201-15, xii. PubMed ID: 16442430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.