These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16401267)

  • 1. The evaluation of treatment when center-specific selection criteria vary with respect to patient risk.
    DeLong ER; Coombs LP; Ferguson TB; Peterson ED
    Biometrics; 2005 Dec; 61(4):942-9. PubMed ID: 16401267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acute coronary care in the elderly, part I: Non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology: in collaboration with the Society of Geriatric Cardiology.
    Alexander KP; Newby LK; Cannon CP; Armstrong PW; Gibler WB; Rich MW; Van de Werf F; White HD; Weaver WD; Naylor MD; Gore JM; Krumholz HM; Ohman EM; ;
    Circulation; 2007 May; 115(19):2549-69. PubMed ID: 17502590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interpreting treatment-effect estimates with heterogeneity and choice: simulation model results.
    Brooks JM; Fang G
    Clin Ther; 2009 Apr; 31(4):902-19. PubMed ID: 19446162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of procedural volume on outcome of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in Japan: implication toward public reporting and minimal volume standards.
    Miyata H; Motomura N; Ueda Y; Matsuda H; Takamoto S
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Jun; 135(6):1306-12. PubMed ID: 18544377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Heterogeneity and the interpretation of treatment effect estimates from risk adjustment and instrumental variable methods.
    Brooks JM; Chrischilles EA
    Med Care; 2007 Oct; 45(10 Supl 2):S123-30. PubMed ID: 17909370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uterine artery embolization as a treatment option for uterine myomas.
    Marshburn PB; Matthews ML; Hurst BS
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2006 Mar; 33(1):125-44. PubMed ID: 16504811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Opioids and the management of chronic severe pain in the elderly: consensus statement of an International Expert Panel with focus on the six clinically most often used World Health Organization Step III opioids (buprenorphine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, methadone, morphine, oxycodone).
    Pergolizzi J; Böger RH; Budd K; Dahan A; Erdine S; Hans G; Kress HG; Langford R; Likar R; Raffa RB; Sacerdote P
    Pain Pract; 2008; 8(4):287-313. PubMed ID: 18503626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stratification of complexity: the Risk Adjustment for Congenital Heart Surgery-1 method and the Aristotle Complexity Score--past, present, and future.
    Jacobs ML; Jacobs JP; Jenkins KJ; Gauvreau K; Clarke DR; Lacour-Gayet F
    Cardiol Young; 2008 Dec; 18 Suppl 2():163-8. PubMed ID: 19063787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acute coronary care in the elderly, part II: ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology: in collaboration with the Society of Geriatric Cardiology.
    Alexander KP; Newby LK; Armstrong PW; Cannon CP; Gibler WB; Rich MW; Van de Werf F; White HD; Weaver WD; Naylor MD; Gore JM; Krumholz HM; Ohman EM; ;
    Circulation; 2007 May; 115(19):2570-89. PubMed ID: 17502591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of "risk-adjusted" hospital outcomes.
    Shahian DM; Normand SL
    Circulation; 2008 Apr; 117(15):1955-63. PubMed ID: 18391106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How to anticipate the assessment of the public health benefit of new medicines?
    Massol J; Puech A; Boissel JP;
    Therapie; 2007; 62(5):427-35. PubMed ID: 18206104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk adjustment and outcome research. Part I.
    Arcà M; Fusco D; Barone AP; Perucci CA
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2006 Sep; 7(9):682-90. PubMed ID: 16932082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving quality of care in cardiac surgery: evaluating risk factors, processes of care, structures of care, and outcomes.
    Shroyer AL; McDonald GO; Wagner BD; Johnson R; Schade LM; Bell MR; Grover FL
    Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2008 Sep; 12(3):140-52. PubMed ID: 18805849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of risk-adjustment models using administrative or clinical data for outcome prediction in patients after myocardial infarction or coronary bypass surgery in Korea.
    Park HK; Yoon SJ; Ahn HS; Ahn LS; Seo HJ; Lee SI; Lee KS
    Int J Clin Pract; 2007 Jul; 61(7):1086-90. PubMed ID: 17537190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modelling, prediction and adaptive adjustment of recruitment in multicentre trials.
    Anisimov VV; Fedorov VV
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):4958-75. PubMed ID: 17639505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does fast-track treatment lead to a decrease of intensive care unit and hospital length of stay in coronary artery bypass patients? A meta-regression of randomized clinical trials.
    van Mastrigt GA; Maessen JG; Heijmans J; Severens JL; Prins MH
    Crit Care Med; 2006 Jun; 34(6):1624-34. PubMed ID: 16614584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New strategies are needed to improve the accuracy of influenza vaccine effectiveness estimates among seniors.
    Nelson JC; Jackson ML; Weiss NS; Jackson LA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jul; 62(7):687-94. PubMed ID: 19124221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.