These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16401281)

  • 1. A shared response model for clustered binary data in developmental toxicity studies.
    Pang Z; Kuk AY
    Biometrics; 2005 Dec; 61(4):1076-84. PubMed ID: 16401281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A full likelihood procedure for analysing exchangeable binary data.
    George EO; Bowman D
    Biometrics; 1995 Jun; 51(2):512-23. PubMed ID: 7662840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An evaluation of some methods for fitting dose-response models to quantal-response developmental toxicology data.
    Carr GJ; Portier CJ
    Biometrics; 1993 Sep; 49(3):779-91. PubMed ID: 8241373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tree-structured logistic models for over-dispersed binomial data with application to modeling developmental effects.
    Ahn H; Chen JJ
    Biometrics; 1997 Jun; 53(2):435-55. PubMed ID: 9235119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A parametric model for detecting hormetic effects in developmental toxicity studies.
    Hunt DL; Bowman D
    Risk Anal; 2004 Feb; 24(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 15028001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cluster sampling techniques in quantal response teratology and developmental toxicity studies.
    Bieler GS; Williams RL
    Biometrics; 1995 Jun; 51(2):764-76. PubMed ID: 7662858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistical model for fetal death, fetal weight, and malformation in developmental toxicity studies.
    Catalano PJ; Scharfstein DO; Ryan LM; Kimmel CA; Kimmel GL
    Teratology; 1993 Apr; 47(4):281-90. PubMed ID: 8322222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bootstrap estimation of benchmark doses and confidence limits with clustered quantal data.
    Zhu Y; Wang T; Jelsovsky JZ
    Risk Anal; 2007 Apr; 27(2):447-65. PubMed ID: 17511711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new threshold dose-response model including random effects for data from developmental toxicity studies.
    Hunt DL; Rai SN
    J Appl Toxicol; 2005; 25(5):435-9. PubMed ID: 16092077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dose-dependent number of implants and implications in developmental toxicity.
    Dunson DB
    Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):558-69. PubMed ID: 9629644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of a correlated binomial model for the analysis of certain toxicological experiments.
    Kupper LL; Haseman JK
    Biometrics; 1978 Mar; 34(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 564719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of trinomial responses from reproductive and developmental toxicity experiments.
    Chen JJ; Kodell RL; Howe RB; Gaylor DW
    Biometrics; 1991 Sep; 47(3):1049-58. PubMed ID: 1742429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robustness of a parametric model for informatively censored bivariate longitudinal data under misspecification of its distributional assumptions: A simulation study.
    Pantazis N; Touloumi G
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(30):5473-85. PubMed ID: 18058854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mixed effects logistic regression models for longitudinal binary response data with informative drop-out.
    Ten Have TR; Kunselman AR; Pulkstenis EP; Landis JR
    Biometrics; 1998 Mar; 54(1):367-83. PubMed ID: 9544529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Test of marginal compatibility and smoothing methods for exchangeable binary data with unequal cluster sizes.
    Pang Z; Kuk AY
    Biometrics; 2007 Mar; 63(1):218-27. PubMed ID: 17447948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A unified approach for analyzing exchangeable binary data with applications to developmental toxicity studies.
    Dang X; Keeton SL; Peng H
    Stat Med; 2009 Sep; 28(20):2580-604. PubMed ID: 19548299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative risk assessment for developmental toxicity.
    Ryan L
    Biometrics; 1992 Mar; 48(1):163-74. PubMed ID: 1581483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using historical controls in the analysis of developmental toxicity data.
    Ryan L
    Biometrics; 1993 Dec; 49(4):1126-35. PubMed ID: 8117906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Harmonization of terminology in developmental toxicology: the quest for a more precise description and a harmonized classification of fetal observations.
    Paumgartten F; Solecki R; Buschmann J; Clark R; Grote K; Rauch M; Chahoud I
    Reprod Toxicol; 2009 Jan; 27(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 19121384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Probabilistic dose-response modeling: case study using dichloromethane PBPK model results.
    Marino DJ; Starr TB
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Dec; 49(3):285-300. PubMed ID: 17949874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.