181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16402257)
1. CT colonography: comparison of a colon dissection display versus 3D endoluminal view for the detection of polyps.
Juchems MS; Fleiter TR; Pauls S; Schmidt SA; Brambs HJ; Aschoff AJ
Eur Radiol; 2006 Jan; 16(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 16402257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Colon dissection: a new three-dimensional reconstruction tool for computed tomography colonography.
Röttgen R; Fischbach F; Plotkin M; Herzog H; Freund T; Schröder RJ; Felix R
Acta Radiol; 2005 May; 46(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 15981716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Virtual colon dissection with CT colonography compared with axial interpretation and conventional colonoscopy: preliminary results.
Hoppe H; Quattropani C; Spreng A; Mattich J; Netzer P; Dinkel HP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 May; 182(5):1151-8. PubMed ID: 15100110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [CT colonography: evaluation of two 3D algorithms in a screening population].
Juchems MS; Ernst AS; Sheafor DH; Carrascosa P; Virmany S; Brambs HJ; Aschoff AJ
Rofo; 2009 Jun; 181(6):573-8. PubMed ID: 19440949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multidetector CT colonoscopy: evaluation of the perspective-filet view virtual colon dissection technique for the detection of elevated lesions.
Carrascosa P; Capuñay C; López EM; Ulla M; Castiglioni R; Carrascosa J
Abdom Imaging; 2007; 32(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 17143581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [CT-colonography with the 16-slice CT for the diagnostic evaluation of colorectal neoplasms and inflammatory colon diseases].
Röttgen R; Schröder RJ; Lorenz M; Herbel A; Fischbach F; Herzog H; Lopez-Häninnen E; Gutberlet M; Hoffmann K; Helmig K; Felix R
Rofo; 2003 Oct; 175(10):1384-91. PubMed ID: 14556108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Primary three-dimensional analysis with perspective-filet view versus primary two-dimensional analysis: evaluation of lesion detection by inexperienced readers at computed tomographic colonography in symptomatic patients.
Fisichella VA; Jäderling F; Horvath S; Stotzer PO; Kilander A; Hellström M
Acta Radiol; 2009 Apr; 50(3):244-55. PubMed ID: 19235581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of colorectal lesions: lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy.
Iannaccone R; Laghi A; Catalano C; Brink JA; Mangiapane F; Trenna S; Piacentini F; Passariello R
Radiology; 2003 Dec; 229(3):775-81. PubMed ID: 14657315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Polyp detection with CT colonography: primary 3D endoluminal analysis versus primary 2D transverse analysis with computer-assisted reader software.
Taylor SA; Halligan S; Slater A; Goh V; Burling DN; Roddie ME; Honeyfield L; McQuillan J; Amin H; Dehmeshki J
Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):759-67. PubMed ID: 16543593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Colonic surveillance by CT colonography using axial images only.
Bruzzi JF; Moss AC; Brennan DD; MacMathuna P; Fenlon HM
Eur Radiol; 2004 May; 14(5):763-7. PubMed ID: 14986051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection.
Macari M; Bini EJ; Xue X; Milano A; Katz SS; Resnick D; Chandarana H; Krinsky G; Klingenbeck K; Marshall CH; Megibow AJ
Radiology; 2002 Aug; 224(2):383-92. PubMed ID: 12147833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Polyp detection at 3-dimensional endoluminal computed tomography colonography: sensitivity of one-way fly-through at 120 degrees field-of-view angle.
Pickhardt PJ; Schumacher C; Kim DH
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(4):631-5. PubMed ID: 19638863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CT colonography using different reconstruction modi.
Röttgen R; Fischbach F; Plotkin M; Lorenz M; Freund T; Schröder RJ; Felix RR
Clin Imaging; 2005; 29(3):195-9. PubMed ID: 15855065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CT colonography: single- versus multi-detector row imaging.
Hara AK; Johnson CD; MacCarty RL; Welch TJ; McCollough CH; Harmsen WS
Radiology; 2001 May; 219(2):461-5. PubMed ID: 11323473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. False-negative results at multi-detector row CT colonography: multivariate analysis of causes for missed lesions.
Park SH; Ha HK; Kim MJ; Kim KW; Kim AY; Yang DH; Lee MG; Kim PN; Shin YM; Yang SK; Myung SJ; Min YI
Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):495-502. PubMed ID: 15770042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of supine and prone scanning separately and in combination at CT colonography.
Yee J; Kumar NN; Hung RK; Akerkar GA; Kumar PR; Wall SD
Radiology; 2003 Mar; 226(3):653-61. PubMed ID: 12601201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Current role and future potential of computed tomographic colonography for colorectal polyp detection and colon cancer screening-incidental findings.
Sohns C; Heuser M; Sossalla S; Wolff H; Obenauer S
Clin Imaging; 2008; 32(4):280-6. PubMed ID: 18603183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Virtual CT colonoscopy and virtual CT barium enema using multidetector-row CT].
Lee SJ
Korean J Gastroenterol; 2006 Oct; 48(4):233-40. PubMed ID: 17060716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 3D detection of colonic polyps by CT colonography: accuracy, pitfalls, and solutions by adjunct 2D workup.
Schmidt SA; Ernst AS; Beer M; Juchems MS
Clin Radiol; 2015 Oct; 70(10):1144-51. PubMed ID: 26220124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps.
Johnson CD; Harmsen WS; Wilson LA; Maccarty RL; Welch TJ; Ilstrup DM; Ahlquist DA
Gastroenterology; 2003 Aug; 125(2):311-9. PubMed ID: 12891530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
