These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16402524)

  • 1. ['Gold standard', not 'golden standard'].
    Claassen JA
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Dec; 149(52):2937. PubMed ID: 16402524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ['Gold standard,' not 'golden standard'].
    Kneepkens CM
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2006 Mar; 150(11):644-5; author reply 645. PubMed ID: 16610511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methods for evaluating the performance of diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard: a latent class model approach.
    Garrett ES; Eaton WW; Zeger S
    Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1289-307. PubMed ID: 12111879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Some issues in resolution of diagnostic tests using an imperfect gold standard.
    Hawkins DM; Garrett JA; Stephenson B
    Stat Med; 2001 Jul; 20(13):1987-2001. PubMed ID: 11427955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Classification of perioperative histamine-related reactions.
    Sitter H; Torossian A; Duda D; Sattler J
    Inflamm Res; 2004 Aug; 53 Suppl 2():S164-8. PubMed ID: 15338070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating medical diagnostic tests at the subunit level in the presence of verification bias.
    Barnhart HX; Kosinski AS
    Stat Med; 2003 Jul; 22(13):2161-76. PubMed ID: 12820281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sample size calculations for evaluating a diagnostic test when the gold standard is missing at random.
    Kosinski AS; Chen Y; Lyles RH
    Stat Med; 2011 Jan; 30(2):200. PubMed ID: 21204125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Regarding the paper 'Sample size calculations for evaluating a diagnostic test when the gold standard is missing at random'.
    Skaik YA
    Stat Med; 2010 Oct; 29(24):2568. PubMed ID: 20954220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A review of solutions for diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect or missing reference standard.
    Reitsma JB; Rutjes AW; Khan KS; Coomarasamy A; Bossuyt PM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):797-806. PubMed ID: 19447581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Wilcoxon-based group sequential designs for comparison of areas under two correlated ROC curves.
    Zhou XH; Li SM; Gatsonis CA
    Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):213-23. PubMed ID: 17357988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Critical appraisal for emergency medicine: 5 Evaluation of a diagnostic test.
    Goodacre S
    Emerg Med J; 2009 Jan; 26(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 19104103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A systematic review on the diagnosis of pediatric bacterial pneumonia: when gold is bronze.
    Lynch T; Bialy L; Kellner JD; Osmond MH; Klassen TP; Durec T; Leicht R; Johnson DW
    PLoS One; 2010 Aug; 5(8):e11989. PubMed ID: 20700510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Criteria for evaluating interventions.
    Miles TR
    Dyslexia; 2007 Nov; 13(4):253-6. PubMed ID: 17948881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multiple imputation to correct for partial verification bias revisited.
    de Groot JA; Janssen KJ; Zwinderman AH; Moons KG; Reitsma JB
    Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(28):5880-9. PubMed ID: 18752256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic test evaluation methodology: A systematic review of methods employed to evaluate diagnostic tests in the absence of gold standard - An update.
    Umemneku Chikere CM; Wilson K; Graziadio S; Vale L; Allen AJ
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223832. PubMed ID: 31603953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A philosophical perspective supports the need for patient-outcome studies in diagnostic test evaluation.
    Sonke GS; Verbeek AL; Kiemeney LA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 18619792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic laboratory tests and reference intervals.
    Archer J
    J Small Anim Pract; 2010 Sep; 51(9):459-60. PubMed ID: 21050217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability of the MDRD method for estimating glomerular filtration rate in relation to gender, body mass index and extracellular fluid volume.
    Bird NJ; Peters C; Michell AR; Peters AM
    Eur J Clin Invest; 2008 Jul; 38(7):486-93. PubMed ID: 18578690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating diagnostic accuracy in the face of multiple reference standards.
    Naaktgeboren CA; de Groot JA; van Smeden M; Moons KG; Reitsma JB
    Ann Intern Med; 2013 Aug; 159(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 23922065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Biplot as a diagnostic tool of local dependence in latent class models. A medical application.
    Sepúlveda R; Vicente-Villardón JL; Galindo MP
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(11):1855-69. PubMed ID: 18265437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.