These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16403611)

  • 1. Psychophysical measures in patients fitted with Contour and straight Nucleus electrode arrays.
    Cohen LT; Saunders E; Knight MR; Cowan RS
    Hear Res; 2006 Feb; 212(1-2):160-75. PubMed ID: 16403611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A psychophysical forward masking comparison of longitudinal spread of neural excitation in the Contour and straight Nucleus electrode arrays.
    Cohen LT; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Bender von Saebelkampf C; Busby PA; Cowan RS
    Int J Audiol; 2005 Oct; 44(10):559-66. PubMed ID: 16315446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pitch matching psychometrics in electric acoustic stimulation.
    Baumann U; Rader T; Helbig S; Bahmer A
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):656-62. PubMed ID: 21869623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neural response telemetry reconsidered: II. The influence of neural population on the ECAP recovery function and refractoriness.
    Botros A; Psarros C
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):380-91. PubMed ID: 20090532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modiolar coiling, electrical thresholds, and speech perception after cochlear implantation using the nucleus contour advance electrode with the advance off stylet technique.
    Huang TC; Reitzen SD; Marrinan MS; Waltzman SB; Roland JT
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 16436984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrode interaction in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of straight and contour electrode arrays.
    Xi X; Ji F; Han D; Hong M; Chen A
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2009; 71(4):228-37. PubMed ID: 19707042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in adults and children: effects of lateral to medial placement of the nucleus 24 contour electrode array.
    Runge-Samuelson C; Firszt JB; Gaggl W; Wackym PA
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jun; 30(4):464-70. PubMed ID: 19300297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intra- and postoperative electrode impedance of the straight and Contour arrays of the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant: relation to T and C levels.
    van Wermeskerken GK; van Olphen AF; Smoorenburg GF
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Sep; 45(9):537-44. PubMed ID: 17005497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Psychophysical assessment of spatial spread of excitation in electrical hearing with single and dual electrode contact maskers.
    Dingemanse JG; Frijns JH; Briaire JJ
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):645-57. PubMed ID: 17086076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Excitation patterns of simultaneous and sequential dual-electrode stimulation in cochlear implant recipients.
    Saoji AA; Litvak LM; Hughes ML
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):559-67. PubMed ID: 19617837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical evaluation of higher stimulation rates in the nucleus research platform 8 system.
    Plant K; Holden L; Skinner M; Arcaroli J; Whitford L; Law MA; Nel E
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 17485987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant.
    Busby PA; Battmer RD; Pesch J
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of perimodiolar placement on speech perception and frequency discrimination by cochlear implant users.
    Fitzgerald MB; Shapiro WH; McDonald PD; Neuburger HS; Ashburn-Reed S; Immerman S; Jethanamest D; Roland JT; Svirsky MA
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Apr; 127(4):378-83. PubMed ID: 17453457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Threshold, comfortable level and impedance changes as a function of electrode-modiolar distance.
    Saunders E; Cohen L; Aschendorff A; Shapiro W; Knight M; Stecker M; Richter B; Waltzman S; Tykocinski M; Roland T; Laszig R; Cowan R
    Ear Hear; 2002 Feb; 23(1 Suppl):28S-40S. PubMed ID: 11883764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Nucleus Contour electrode array: a radiological and histological study.
    Richter B; Aschendorff A; Lohnstein P; Husstedt H; Nagursky H; Laszig R
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Mar; 111(3):508-14. PubMed ID: 11224784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality control after insertion of the nucleus contour and contour advance electrode in adults.
    Aschendorff A; Kromeier J; Klenzner T; Laszig R
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):75S-79S. PubMed ID: 17496653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 3D finite element analyses of insertion of the Nucleus standard straight and the Contour electrode arrays into the human cochlea.
    Kha HN; Chen BK; Clark GM
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(12):2796-805. PubMed ID: 17408675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Psychophysics of a prototype peri-modiolar cochlear implant electrode array.
    Cohen LT; Saunders E; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 2001 May; 155(1-2):63-81. PubMed ID: 11335077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of two frequency-to-electrode maps for acoustic-electric stimulation.
    Simpson A; McDermott HJ; Dowell RC; Sucher C; Briggs RJ
    Int J Audiol; 2009 Feb; 48(2):63-73. PubMed ID: 19219690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.