These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16404041)

  • 1. PelvicSim--a computational-experimental system for biomechanical evaluation of female pelvic floor organ disorders and associated minimally invasive interventions.
    Haridas B; Hong H; Minoguchi R; Owens S; Osborn T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 119():182-7. PubMed ID: 16404041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tissue mechanics, animal models, and pelvic organ prolapse: a review.
    Abramowitch SD; Feola A; Jallah Z; Moalli PA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 May; 144 Suppl 1():S146-58. PubMed ID: 19285776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Experiments and finite element modelling for the study of prolapse in the pelvic floor system.
    Venugopala Rao G; Rubod C; Brieu M; Bhatnagar N; Cosson M
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2010 Jun; 13(3):349-57. PubMed ID: 20099169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Female incontinence: a review of biomaterials and minimally invasive techniques.
    Amrute KV; Badlani GH
    Curr Opin Urol; 2006 Mar; 16(2):54-9. PubMed ID: 16479204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An efficient and scalable deformable model for virtual reality-based medical applications.
    Choi KS; Sun H; Heng PA
    Artif Intell Med; 2004 Sep; 32(1):51-69. PubMed ID: 15350624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. EndoCAS navigator platform: a common platform for computer and robotic assistance in minimally invasive surgery.
    Megali G; Ferrari V; Freschi C; Morabito B; Cavallo F; Turini G; Troia E; Cappelli C; Pietrabissa A; Tonet O; Cuschieri A; Dario P; Mosca F
    Int J Med Robot; 2008 Sep; 4(3):242-51. PubMed ID: 18698670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvic floor: from clinical to biomechanical imaging.
    Brandão S; Da Roza T; Parente M; Ramos I; Mascarenhas T; Natal Jorge RM
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Dec; 227(12):1324-32. PubMed ID: 24030164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modern Theories of Pelvic Floor Support : A Topical Review of Modern Studies on Structural and Functional Pelvic Floor Support from Medical Imaging, Computational Modeling, and Electromyographic Perspectives.
    Peng Y; Miller BD; Boone TB; Zhang Y
    Curr Urol Rep; 2018 Feb; 19(1):9. PubMed ID: 29435856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Complex pelvic floor failure and associated problems.
    Elneil S
    Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol; 2009; 23(4):555-73. PubMed ID: 19647690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retrospective multicentre study of the new minimally invasive mesh repair devices for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Toozs-Hobson P; Cardozo L
    BJOG; 2008 Jun; 115(7):919-20; author reply 920-921. PubMed ID: 18485175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retrospective multicentre study of the new minimally invasive mesh repair devices for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Abdel-Fattah M; Ramsay I;
    BJOG; 2008 Jan; 115(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 18053100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 3D Real-time FEM based guide wire simulator with force feedback.
    Bhat S; Mehta C; D'Souza C; Kesavadas T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2005; 111():50-3. PubMed ID: 15718697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of the material properties on the biomechanical behavior of the pelvic floor muscles during vaginal delivery.
    Parente MP; Natal Jorge RM; Mascarenhas T; Fernandes AA; Martins JA
    J Biomech; 2009 Jun; 42(9):1301-6. PubMed ID: 19375709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How to approach common urogynaecological problems?
    Chittacharoen A
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Oct; 88 Suppl 2():S124-8. PubMed ID: 17722326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of an occipito-posterior malposition on the biomechanical behavior of the pelvic floor.
    Parente MP; Jorge RM; Mascarenhas T; Fernandes AA; Martins JA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 May; 144 Suppl 1():S166-9. PubMed ID: 19272693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is hysterectomy necessary for laparoscopic pelvic floor repair? A prospective study.
    Rosen DM; Shukla A; Cario GM; Carlton MA; Chou D
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(6):729-34. PubMed ID: 18971137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pelvic floor surgery in the older woman.
    Gerten KA; Richter HE
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 50(3):826-43. PubMed ID: 17762429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Responsiveness of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ) in women undergoing vaginal surgery and pessary treatment for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Barber MD; Walters MD; Cundiff GW;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 May; 194(5):1492-8. PubMed ID: 16647933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical properties of graft materials employed for pelvic floor reconstructive surgeries.
    Krause HG; Goh JT
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 21(5):419-23. PubMed ID: 19593132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Uterus models for use in virtual reality hysteroscopy simulators.
    Niederer P; Weiss S; Caduff R; Bajka M; Szekély G; Harders M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 May; 144 Suppl 1():S90-5. PubMed ID: 19285774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.