These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16404053)

  • 1. Real-time augmented feedback benefits robotic laparoscopic training.
    Judkins TN; Oleynikov D; Stergiou N
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 119():243-8. PubMed ID: 16404053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Enhanced robotic surgical training using augmented visual feedback.
    Judkins TN; Oleynikov D; Stergiou N
    Surg Innov; 2008 Mar; 15(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 18407930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electromyographic response is altered during robotic surgical training with augmented feedback.
    Judkins TN; Oleynikov D; Stergiou N
    J Biomech; 2009 Jan; 42(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 19041972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Objective assessment of training surgical skills using simulated tissue interface with real-time feedback.
    Rafiq A; Tamariz F; Boanca C; Lavrentyev V; Merrell RC
    J Surg Educ; 2008; 65(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 18707659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of haptic feedback in laparoscopic simulation training.
    Panait L; Akkary E; Bell RL; Roberts KE; Dudrick SJ; Duffy AJ
    J Surg Res; 2009 Oct; 156(2):312-6. PubMed ID: 19631336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. EndoCAS navigator platform: a common platform for computer and robotic assistance in minimally invasive surgery.
    Megali G; Ferrari V; Freschi C; Morabito B; Cavallo F; Turini G; Troia E; Cappelli C; Pietrabissa A; Tonet O; Cuschieri A; Dario P; Mosca F
    Int J Med Robot; 2008 Sep; 4(3):242-51. PubMed ID: 18698670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of sensory substitution on suture-manipulation forces for robotic surgical systems.
    Kitagawa M; Dokko D; Okamura AM; Yuh DD
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Jan; 129(1):151-8. PubMed ID: 15632837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Learning curves of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery: an experimental study evaluating skill acquisition of robot-assisted laparoscopic tasks compared with conventional laparoscopic tasks in inexperienced users.
    Heemskerk J; van Gemert WG; de Vries J; Greve J; Bouvy ND
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2007 Jun; 17(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 17581459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Update on laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive vaginal surgery for pelvic floor repair.
    Ross JW; Preston MR
    Minerva Ginecol; 2009 Jun; 61(3):173-86. PubMed ID: 19415062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Skills learning in robot-assisted surgery is benefited by task-specific augmented feedback.
    Vallabhajosula S; Judkins TN; Mukherjee M; Suh IH; Oleynikov D; Siu KC
    Surg Innov; 2013 Dec; 20(6):639-47. PubMed ID: 23575913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robotic surgical education: a systematic approach to training urology residents to perform robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Rashid HH; Leung YY; Rashid MJ; Oleyourryk G; Valvo JR; Eichel L
    Urology; 2006 Jul; 68(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 16844450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic surgery and resident training.
    De Ugarte DA; Etzioni DA; Gracia C; Atkinson JB
    Surg Endosc; 2003 Jun; 17(6):960-3. PubMed ID: 12658424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gastrointestinal robot-assisted surgery. A current perspective.
    Lunca S; Bouras G; Stanescu AC
    Rom J Gastroenterol; 2005 Dec; 14(4):385-91. PubMed ID: 16400356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of environmental noise on robot-assisted laparoscopic surgical performance.
    Siu KC; Suh IH; Mukherjee M; Oleynikov D; Stergiou N
    Surgery; 2010 Jan; 147(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 19879611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
    Payne TN; Dauterive FR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tele-surgery simulation with a patient organ model for robotic surgery training.
    Suzuki S; Suzuki N; Hattori A; Hayashibe M; Konishi K; Kakeji Y; Hashizume M
    Int J Med Robot; 2005 Dec; 1(4):80-8. PubMed ID: 17518408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development and testing of a tactile feedback system for robotic surgery.
    Grundfest WS; Culjat MO; King CH; Franco ML; Wottawa C; Lewis CE; Bisley JW; Dutson EP
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 142():103-8. PubMed ID: 19377124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: impact on fellowship training.
    Hoekstra AV; Morgan JM; Lurain JR; Buttin BM; Singh DK; Schink JC; Lowe MP
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Aug; 114(2):168-72. PubMed ID: 19446869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Virtual reality for robotic laparoscopic surgical training.
    Fiedler MJ; Chen SJ; Judkins TN; Oleynikov D; Stergiou N
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 125():127-9. PubMed ID: 17377249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Objective evaluation of expert and novice performance during robotic surgical training tasks.
    Judkins TN; Oleynikov D; Stergiou N
    Surg Endosc; 2009 Mar; 23(3):590-7. PubMed ID: 18443870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.