These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16404070)

  • 1. Measurement of the mechanical response of intra-abdominal organs of fresh human cadavers for use in surgical simulation.
    Lim YJ; Jones DB; Singh TP; De S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 119():322-7. PubMed ID: 16404070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characterization of anisotropy in viscoelastic properties of intra-abdominal soft tissues.
    Deo D; Singh TP; Dunnican W; De S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 142():77-81. PubMed ID: 19377118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In situ measurement and modeling of biomechanical response of human cadaveric soft tissues for physics-based surgical simulation.
    Lim YJ; Deo D; Singh TP; Jones DB; De S
    Surg Endosc; 2009 Jun; 23(6):1298-307. PubMed ID: 18813984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measurement of in-vivo force response of intra-abdominal soft tissues for surgical simulation.
    Tay BK; Stylopoulos N; De S; Rattner DW; Srinivasan MA
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 85():514-9. PubMed ID: 15458143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In-vivo and in-situ compressive properties of porcine abdominal soft tissues.
    Brown JD; Rosen J; Kim YS; Chang L; Sinanan MN; Hannaford B
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2003; 94():26-32. PubMed ID: 15455858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vivo mechanical behavior of intra-abdominal organs.
    Tay BK; Kim J; Srinivasan MA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Nov; 53(11):2129-38. PubMed ID: 17073317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Material property determination of sub-surface objects in a viscoelastic environment.
    Mayrose J; Chugh K; Kesavadas T
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2000; 36():313-7. PubMed ID: 10834251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Real-time volume haptic rendering of non-linear viscoelastic behavior of soft tissue through dynamic atomic unit approach.
    Chanda A; Kesavadas T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 98():49-55. PubMed ID: 15544241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computer-controlled motorized endoscopic grasper for in vivo measurement of soft tissue biomechanical characteristics.
    Brown JD; Rosen J; Moreyra M; Sinanan M; Hannaford B
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 85():71-3. PubMed ID: 15458062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Realistic soft tissue deformation strategies for real time surgery simulation.
    Shen Y; Zhou X; Zhang N; Tamma K; Sweet R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 132():457-9. PubMed ID: 18391343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-dimensional finite element simulations of the mechanical response of the fingertip to static and dynamic compressions.
    Wu JZ; Welcome DE; Dong RG
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2006 Feb; 9(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 16880157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficient soft tissue deformation using charged particles.
    Buckley O; John NW
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 132():53-5. PubMed ID: 18391256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A robotic indenter for minimally invasive measurement and characterization of soft tissue response.
    Samur E; Sedef M; Basdogan C; Avtan L; Duzgun O
    Med Image Anal; 2007 Aug; 11(4):361-73. PubMed ID: 17509927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measuring in vivo animal soft tissue properties for haptic modeling in surgical simulation.
    Brouwer I; Ustin J; Bentley L; Sherman A; Dhruv N; Tendick F
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 81():69-74. PubMed ID: 11317820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Physically valid surgical simulators: linear versus nonlinear tissue models.
    Misra S; Ramesh KT; Okamura AM
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 132():293-5. PubMed ID: 18391307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital image correlation and finite element modelling as a method to determine mechanical properties of human soft tissue in vivo.
    Moerman KM; Holt CA; Evans SL; Simms CK
    J Biomech; 2009 May; 42(8):1150-3. PubMed ID: 19362312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanical characterization of anisotropic planar biological soft tissues using finite indentation: experimental feasibility.
    Cox MA; Driessen NJ; Boerboom RA; Bouten CV; Baaijens FP
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(2):422-9. PubMed ID: 17897653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An efficient soft tissue characterization algorithm from in vivo indentation experiments for medical simulation.
    Kim J; Ahn B; De S; Srinivasan MA
    Int J Med Robot; 2008 Sep; 4(3):277-85. PubMed ID: 18727148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical properties of abdominal organs in vivo and postmortem under compression loads.
    Rosen J; Brown JD; De S; Sinanan M; Hannaford B
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Apr; 130(2):021020. PubMed ID: 18412507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Research progress on real-time deformable models of soft tissues for surgery simulation].
    Xu S; Liu X; Zhang H; Luo J
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Apr; 27(2):435-9. PubMed ID: 20481334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.