These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16404126)
1. A haptics based simulator for laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Wu H; Hourie C; Eagleson R; Patel R Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 119():583-5. PubMed ID: 16404126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of haptic feedback in laparoscopic simulation training. Panait L; Akkary E; Bell RL; Roberts KE; Dudrick SJ; Duffy AJ J Surg Res; 2009 Oct; 156(2):312-6. PubMed ID: 19631336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preoperative planning system for surgical robotics setup with kinematics and haptics. Hayashibe M; Suzuki N; Hashizume M; Kakeji Y; Konishi K; Suzuki S; Hattori A Int J Med Robot; 2005 Jan; 1(2):76-85. PubMed ID: 17518381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a review of the current status. Shah KK; Louie M; Thaly RK; Patel VR Int J Med Robot; 2007 Mar; 3():35-40. PubMed ID: 17441024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of haptics in medical applications. Fager PJ; von Wowern P Int J Med Robot; 2004 Jun; 1(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 17520595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robot assisted pyeloplasty in the infant-lessons learned. Kutikov A; Nguyen M; Guzzo T; Canter D; Casale P J Urol; 2006 Nov; 176(5):2237-9; discussion 2239-40. PubMed ID: 17070302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. EndoCAS navigator platform: a common platform for computer and robotic assistance in minimally invasive surgery. Megali G; Ferrari V; Freschi C; Morabito B; Cavallo F; Turini G; Troia E; Cappelli C; Pietrabissa A; Tonet O; Cuschieri A; Dario P; Mosca F Int J Med Robot; 2008 Sep; 4(3):242-51. PubMed ID: 18698670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in a horseshoe kidney. Talug C; Perlmutter AE; Kumar T; Zaslau S; Tarry WF Can J Urol; 2007 Dec; 14(6):3773-5. PubMed ID: 18163934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A simulator to explore the role of haptic feedback in cataract surgery training. Doyle L; Gauthier N; Ramanathan S; Okamura A Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 132():106-11. PubMed ID: 18391267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic pyeloplasty: a critical appraisal. Badwan K; Bhayani S Int J Med Robot; 2007 Mar; 3():20-2. PubMed ID: 17441021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A PC-based surgical simulator for laparoscopic surgery. Tseng CS; Lee YY; Chan YP; Wu SS; Chiu AW Stud Health Technol Inform; 1998; 50():155-60. PubMed ID: 10180533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic surgery for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Lee RS; Borer JG Curr Opin Urol; 2006 Jul; 16(4):291-4. PubMed ID: 16770130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in patients of ureteropelvic junction obstruction with previously failed open surgical repair. Hemal AK; Mishra S; Mukharjee S; Suryavanshi M Int J Urol; 2008 Aug; 15(8):744-6. PubMed ID: 18786197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Which is better--retroperitoneoscopic or laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children? Canon SJ; Jayanthi VR; Lowe GJ J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 2):1791-5; discussion 1795. PubMed ID: 17707427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: long-term experience with an algorithm for laser endopyelotomy and laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyeloplasty. Rassweiler JJ; Subotic S; Feist-Schwenk M; Sugiono M; Schulze M; Teber D; Frede T J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):1000-5. PubMed ID: 17296396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]