376 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16405574)
1. Measuring natural and sexual selection on breeding values of male display traits in Drosophila serrata.
Skroblin A; Blows MW
J Evol Biol; 2006 Jan; 19(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 16405574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An evolutionary limit to male mating success.
McGuigan K; Van Homrigh A; Blows MW
Evolution; 2008 Jun; 62(6):1528-37. PubMed ID: 18363864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genetic constraints and the evolution of display trait sexual dimorphism by natural and sexual selection.
Chenoweth SF; Rundle HD; Blows MW
Am Nat; 2008 Jan; 171(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 18171148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Condition dependence of a multicomponent sexual display trait in Drosophila serrata.
Delcourt M; Rundle HD
Am Nat; 2011 Jun; 177(6):812-23. PubMed ID: 21597257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The evolution of reproductive character displacement conflicts with how sexual selection operates within a species.
Higgie M; Blows MW
Evolution; 2008 May; 62(5):1192-203. PubMed ID: 18298640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The depletion of genetic variance by sexual selection.
Van Homrigh A; Higgie M; McGuigan K; Blows MW
Curr Biol; 2007 Mar; 17(6):528-32. PubMed ID: 17306541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The diversification of mate preferences by natural and sexual selection.
Rundle HD; Chenoweth SF; Blows MW
J Evol Biol; 2009 Aug; 22(8):1608-15. PubMed ID: 19549142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The roles of natural and sexual selection during adaptation to a novel environment.
Rundle HD; Chenoweth SF; Blows MW
Evolution; 2006 Nov; 60(11):2218-25. PubMed ID: 17236415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genetic analysis of female preference functions as function-valued traits.
McGuigan K; Van Homrigh A; Blows MW
Am Nat; 2008 Aug; 172(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 18597623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reduced genetic variance among high fitness individuals: inferring stabilizing selection on male sexual displays in Drosophila serrata.
Sztepanacz JL; Rundle HD
Evolution; 2012 Oct; 66(10):3101-10. PubMed ID: 23025601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Orientation of the genetic variance-covariance matrix and the fitness surface for multiple male sexually selected traits.
Blows MW; Chenoweth SF; Hine E
Am Nat; 2004 Mar; 163(3):329-40. PubMed ID: 15026971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing complex fitness surfaces: among-population variation in mutual sexual selection in Drosophila serrata.
Rundle HD; Chenoweth SF; Blows MW
Am Nat; 2008 Apr; 171(4):443-54. PubMed ID: 18254685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contrasting mutual sexual selection on homologous signal traits in Drosophila serrata.
Chenoweth SF; Blows MW
Am Nat; 2005 Feb; 165(2):281-9. PubMed ID: 15729657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On the evolution of heightened condition dependence of male sexual displays.
Gosden TP; Chenoweth SF
J Evol Biol; 2011 Mar; 24(3):685-92. PubMed ID: 21214657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The contribution of selection and genetic constraints to phenotypic divergence.
Chenoweth SF; Rundle HD; Blows MW
Am Nat; 2010 Feb; 175(2):186-96. PubMed ID: 20059364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlational selection leads to genetic integration of body size and an attractive plumage trait in dark-eyed juncos.
McGlothlin JW; Parker PG; Nolan V; Ketterson ED
Evolution; 2005 Mar; 59(3):658-71. PubMed ID: 15856707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stronger convex (stabilizing) selection on homologous sexual display traits in females than in males: a multipopulation comparison in Drosophila serrata.
Rundle HD; Chenoweth SF
Evolution; 2011 Mar; 65(3):893-9. PubMed ID: 21361917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sexual selection and immune function in Drosophila melanogaster.
McKean KA; Nunney L
Evolution; 2008 Feb; 62(2):386-400. PubMed ID: 18070086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Are traits that experience reinforcement also under sexual selection?
Higgie M; Blows MW
Am Nat; 2007 Sep; 170(3):409-20. PubMed ID: 17879191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Live fast, die young: trade-offs between fitness components and sexually antagonistic selection on weaponry in Soay sheep.
Robinson MR; Pilkington JG; Clutton-Brock TH; Pemberton JM; Kruuk LE
Evolution; 2006 Oct; 60(10):2168-81. PubMed ID: 17133873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
