These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16408358)
1. Corporate influence on chemical exposure levels. Silver K Sci People; 1989; 21(1):24-5. PubMed ID: 16408358 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. ACGIH's threshold limit values useful, but formulas are still controversial. Toxicologic methods in determining TLVs, scientific adequacy and political factors questioned. Borak J Occup Health Saf; 1994 Aug; 63(8):26-7. PubMed ID: 15662868 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Rationale for the method of determining the maximum allowable exposure level to hazardous industrial substances adopted in USA]. Novikov SM; Semenovykh LN Gig Sanit; 1994 Feb; (2):25-30. PubMed ID: 8005468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Updating OSHA's permissible exposure limits: putting politics aside. Paustenbach DJ Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1997 Dec; 58(12):845-9. PubMed ID: 9425644 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Outdated air contaminants system disruptive to industry and labor. Borak J Occup Health Saf; 1994 Dec; 63(12):41. PubMed ID: 15655989 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The beryllium occupational exposure limit: historical origin and current inadequacy. Michaels D; Monforton C J Occup Environ Med; 2006 Oct; 48(10):998-1000; author reply 1000-1. PubMed ID: 17033496 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists: low threshold of credibility. Castleman BI; Ziem GE Am J Ind Med; 1994 Jul; 26(1):133-43. PubMed ID: 8074122 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Financial conflicts of interest are related to voting patterns at FDA Advisory Committee meetings. Lurie P MedGenMed; 2006 Oct; 8(4):22. PubMed ID: 17415305 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Plan B: Politics and values at the FDA, again. Dresser R Hastings Cent Rep; 2004; 34(6):9-10. PubMed ID: 15704280 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. New approach set to protect workers from asbestos exposures below PELs. Borak J; Russi M Occup Health Saf; 1995 Feb; 64(2):39-40. PubMed ID: 7870404 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Is corporate influence good for medicine? Pontious JM J Okla State Med Assoc; 2004 Mar; 97(3):104. PubMed ID: 15088812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The origin and development of the asbestos Threshold Limit Value: scientific indifference and corporate influence. Egilman DS; Reinert AA Int J Health Serv; 1995; 25(4):667-96. PubMed ID: 8575867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Latex debate: it's not just academic. Perry PA Mater Manag Health Care; 1999 Jun; 8(6):14. PubMed ID: 10538987 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Conflicts of interest and the common good in alcohol policy and research. Cook CC Addiction; 2005 Oct; 100(10):1555-6. PubMed ID: 16185217 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Complying with OSHA's hexavalent chromium standards. Cole CJ Occup Health Saf; 2007 Mar; 76(3):40, 42-4. PubMed ID: 17424956 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Perspectives on what we formerly called threshold limit values. Goldsmith JR Am J Ind Med; 1991; 19(6):805-12. PubMed ID: 1882857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gas detection for VOC measurement. Henderson RE Occup Health Saf; 2004 Oct; 73(10):72, 74-7. PubMed ID: 15553420 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Occupational exposure to hexavalent chromium. Final rule. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Department of Labor Fed Regist; 2006 Feb; 71(39):10099-385. PubMed ID: 16528853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. EPA accused of conflict of interest over chemicals study. Brumfiel G Nature; 2004 Nov; 432(7013):6. PubMed ID: 15525949 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]