197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16408358)
1. Corporate influence on chemical exposure levels.
Silver K
Sci People; 1989; 21(1):24-5. PubMed ID: 16408358
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. ACGIH's threshold limit values useful, but formulas are still controversial. Toxicologic methods in determining TLVs, scientific adequacy and political factors questioned.
Borak J
Occup Health Saf; 1994 Aug; 63(8):26-7. PubMed ID: 15662868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Rationale for the method of determining the maximum allowable exposure level to hazardous industrial substances adopted in USA].
Novikov SM; Semenovykh LN
Gig Sanit; 1994 Feb; (2):25-30. PubMed ID: 8005468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Updating OSHA's permissible exposure limits: putting politics aside.
Paustenbach DJ
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1997 Dec; 58(12):845-9. PubMed ID: 9425644
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Outdated air contaminants system disruptive to industry and labor.
Borak J
Occup Health Saf; 1994 Dec; 63(12):41. PubMed ID: 15655989
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Despite pre-emption threat local right-to-know laws increase.
McElveen JC
Occup Health Saf; 1985 Jan; 54(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 3982759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The beryllium occupational exposure limit: historical origin and current inadequacy.
Michaels D; Monforton C
J Occup Environ Med; 2006 Oct; 48(10):998-1000; author reply 1000-1. PubMed ID: 17033496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists: low threshold of credibility.
Castleman BI; Ziem GE
Am J Ind Med; 1994 Jul; 26(1):133-43. PubMed ID: 8074122
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Financial conflicts of interest are related to voting patterns at FDA Advisory Committee meetings.
Lurie P
MedGenMed; 2006 Oct; 8(4):22. PubMed ID: 17415305
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Plan B: Politics and values at the FDA, again.
Dresser R
Hastings Cent Rep; 2004; 34(6):9-10. PubMed ID: 15704280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. New approach set to protect workers from asbestos exposures below PELs.
Borak J; Russi M
Occup Health Saf; 1995 Feb; 64(2):39-40. PubMed ID: 7870404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Is corporate influence good for medicine?
Pontious JM
J Okla State Med Assoc; 2004 Mar; 97(3):104. PubMed ID: 15088812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The origin and development of the asbestos Threshold Limit Value: scientific indifference and corporate influence.
Egilman DS; Reinert AA
Int J Health Serv; 1995; 25(4):667-96. PubMed ID: 8575867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Latex debate: it's not just academic.
Perry PA
Mater Manag Health Care; 1999 Jun; 8(6):14. PubMed ID: 10538987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Conflicts of interest and the common good in alcohol policy and research.
Cook CC
Addiction; 2005 Oct; 100(10):1555-6. PubMed ID: 16185217
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Complying with OSHA's hexavalent chromium standards.
Cole CJ
Occup Health Saf; 2007 Mar; 76(3):40, 42-4. PubMed ID: 17424956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Perspectives on what we formerly called threshold limit values.
Goldsmith JR
Am J Ind Med; 1991; 19(6):805-12. PubMed ID: 1882857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gas detection for VOC measurement.
Henderson RE
Occup Health Saf; 2004 Oct; 73(10):72, 74-7. PubMed ID: 15553420
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Occupational exposure to hexavalent chromium. Final rule.
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Department of Labor
Fed Regist; 2006 Feb; 71(39):10099-385. PubMed ID: 16528853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. EPA accused of conflict of interest over chemicals study.
Brumfiel G
Nature; 2004 Nov; 432(7013):6. PubMed ID: 15525949
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
