134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16409095)
1. Correlation between clinical scoring of allergic patch test reactions and optical coherence tomography.
Gambichler T; Moussa G; Sand M; Sand D; Orlikov A; Altmeyer P; Hoffmann K
J Biomed Opt; 2005; 10(6):064030. PubMed ID: 16409095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optical coherence tomography for patch test grading: A prospective study on its use for noninvasive diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis.
Ruini C; Rahimi F; Fiocco Z; French LE; Hartmann D; Oppel E; Sattler E
Contact Dermatitis; 2021 Mar; 84(3):183-191. PubMed ID: 33012002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of positive patch test reactions using optical coherence tomography: A pilot study.
Rajabi-Estarabadi A; Tsang DC; Nouri K; Tosti A
Skin Res Technol; 2019 Sep; 25(5):625-630. PubMed ID: 30888093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differentiating allergic and irritant contact dermatitis by high-definition optical coherence tomography: a pilot study.
Boone MA; Jemec GB; Del Marmol V
Arch Dermatol Res; 2015 Jan; 307(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 25186162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Vesicular Contact Reaction May Progress into Erythema Multiforme.
Czarnecka-Operacz M; Jenerowicz D; Szulczyńska-Gabor J; Teresiak-Mikołajczak E; Szyfter-Harris J; Bowszyc-Dmochowska M
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2016 Dec; 24(4):307-309. PubMed ID: 28128086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative study of allergic contact dermatitis by patch test versus reflectance confocal laser microscopy, with nickel and cobalt.
Sakanashi EN; Matsumura M; Kikuchi K; Ikeda M; Miura H
Eur J Dermatol; 2010; 20(6):705-11. PubMed ID: 20822971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic utility of skin autofluorescence when patch test results are doubtful.
Shin EJ; Seo JK; Lee EJ; Lee ES; Shin MK
Skin Res Technol; 2019 Jan; 25(1):96-99. PubMed ID: 30055047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Add-on diagnostic tool for allergic contact dermatitis: the strip patch test.
Hessam S; Altmeyer P; Dickel H
G Ital Dermatol Venereol; 2012 Feb; 147(1):103-9. PubMed ID: 22370574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2004.
Zug KA; McGinley-Smith D; Warshaw EM; Taylor JS; Rietschel RL; Maibach HI; Belsito DV; Fowler JF; Storrs FJ; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Oct; 144(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 18936397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Acute skin alterations following ultraviolet radiation investigated by optical coherence tomography and histology.
Gambichler T; Boms S; Stücker M; Moussa G; Kreuter A; Sand M; Sand D; Altmeyer P; Hoffmann K
Arch Dermatol Res; 2005 Nov; 297(5):218-25. PubMed ID: 16215762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
Löffler H; Becker D; Brasch J; Geier J;
Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 15840103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of allergic vesicular reaction to patch test using in vivo confocal microscopy.
Ardigò M; Longo C; Cristaudo A; Berardesca E; Pellacani G
Skin Res Technol; 2012 Feb; 18(1):61-3. PubMed ID: 21443755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using optical coherence tomography for the longitudinal non-invasive evaluation of epidermal thickness in a murine model of chronic skin inflammation.
Silver R; Helms A; Fu W; Wang H; Diaconu D; Loyd CM; Rollins AM; Ward NL
Skin Res Technol; 2012 May; 18(2):225-31. PubMed ID: 22092854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Managing the excited skin syndrome: patch testing hyperirritable skin.
Mitchell J; Maibach HI
Contact Dermatitis; 1997 Nov; 37(5):193-9. PubMed ID: 9412745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optical coherence tomography of cutaneous lupus erythematosus correlates with histopathology.
Gambichler T; Hyun J; Moussa G; Tomi NS; Boms S; Altmeyer P; Hoffmann K; Kreuter A
Lupus; 2007; 16(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 17283583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Utility of Store and Forward Teledermatology for Skin Patch Test Readings.
Grey KR; Hagen SL; Hylwa SA; Warshaw EM
Dermatitis; 2017; 28(2):152-161. PubMed ID: 28169849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pretreatment of the test area with 1-day occlusion improves the response rate to NiSO4 5% pet. patch tests in subjects with a positive history of nickel allergy.
Seidenari S; Manzini BM; Belletti B
Contact Dermatitis; 1995 Sep; 33(3):152-6. PubMed ID: 8565454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Epicutaneous patch testing.
Devos SA; Van Der Valk PG
Eur J Dermatol; 2002; 12(5):506-13. PubMed ID: 12370148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Noninvasive in vivo confocal laser scanning microscopy is effective in differentiating allergic from nonallergic equivocal patch test reactions.
Slodownik D; Levi A; Lapidoth M; Ingber A; Horev L; Enk CD
Lasers Med Sci; 2015 Apr; 30(3):1081-7. PubMed ID: 25604734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Path test reactions to the Chinese Standard Screening Allergens in 1,135 patients investigated for allergic contact dermatitis.
Liu YQ; Zhao B; Zhuang LH; Fan WX
Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Sep; 8(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 9249281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
