677 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16409240)
1. Comparison of the rebound tonometer (ICare) to the applanation tonometer (Tonopen XL) in normotensive dogs.
Leiva M; Naranjo C; Peña MT
Vet Ophthalmol; 2006; 9(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 16409240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the rebound tonometer (TonoVet) with the applanation tonometer (TonoPen XL) in normal Eurasian Eagle owls (Bubo bubo).
Jeong MB; Kim YJ; Yi NY; Park SA; Kim WT; Kim SE; Chae JM; Kim JT; Lee H; Seo KM
Vet Ophthalmol; 2007; 10(6):376-9. PubMed ID: 17970999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of the new ICare rebound tonometer vs. other portable tonometers in healthy eyes.
García-Resúa C; González-Meijome JM; Gilino J; Yebra-Pimentel E
Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Feb; 83(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 16501412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers.
Nakamura M; Darhad U; Tatsumi Y; Fujioka M; Kusuhara A; Maeda H; Negi A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Aug; 142(2):332-4. PubMed ID: 16876523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Non-invasive determination of intraocular pressure in the rat eye. Comparison of an electronic tonometer (TonoPen), and a rebound (impact probe) tonometer.
Goldblum D; Kontiola AI; Mittag T; Chen B; Danias J
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Nov; 240(11):942-6. PubMed ID: 12486518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of a rebound tonometer (Tonovet) in clinically normal cat eyes.
Rusanen E; Florin M; Hässig M; Spiess BM
Vet Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 13(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 20149173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the ICare rebound tonometer with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal population.
Fernandes P; Díaz-Rey JA; Queirós A; Gonzalez-Meijome JM; Jorge J
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Sep; 25(5):436-40. PubMed ID: 16101950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three portable tonometers, the TGDc-01, the ICARE and the Tonopen XL, compared with each other and with Goldmann applanation tonometry*.
van der Jagt LH; Jansonius NM
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Sep; 25(5):429-35. PubMed ID: 16101949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Agreement among Goldmann applanation tonometer, iCare, and Icare PRO rebound tonometers; non-contact tonometer; and Tonopen XL in healthy elderly subjects.
Kato Y; Nakakura S; Matsuo N; Yoshitomi K; Handa M; Tabuchi H; Kiuchi Y
Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Apr; 38(2):687-696. PubMed ID: 28393323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements using rebound (TonoVet
McDonald JE; Knollinger AM; Dustin Dees D; MacLaren NE
Vet Ophthalmol; 2017 Mar; 20(2):155-159. PubMed ID: 27111099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the use of new handheld tonometers and established applanation tonometers in dogs.
Görig C; Coenen RT; Stades FC; Djajadiningrat-Laanen SC; Boevé MH
Am J Vet Res; 2006 Jan; 67(1):134-44. PubMed ID: 16426223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements between the Tono-Pen XL® and Perkins® applanation tonometers in dogs and cats.
Andrade SF; Palozzi RJ; Giuffrida R; de Campos RJ; Santos Gde C; Fukui RM
Vet Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 15 Suppl 1():14-20. PubMed ID: 22050624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of rebound tonometer.
Davies LN; Bartlett H; Mallen EA; Wolffsohn JS
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Apr; 84(2):206-9. PubMed ID: 16637838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of a rebound and an applanation tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in normal rabbits.
Pereira FQ; Bercht BS; Soares MG; da Mota MG; Pigatto JA
Vet Ophthalmol; 2011 Sep; 14(5):321-6. PubMed ID: 21929609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical comparison of the Icare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Pakrou N; Gray T; Mills R; Landers J; Craig J
J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 18303384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of intraocular pressure measurements in dogs using two different tonometers and plano therapeutic soft contact lenses.
Ahn JT; Jeong MB; Park YW; Kim SE; Ahn JS; Lee YR; Lee ER; Seo K
Vet Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 15 Suppl 1():83-8. PubMed ID: 22192568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of a rebound tonometer with an applanation tonometer in dogs with glaucoma.
Slack JM; Stiles J; Moore GE
Vet Rec; 2012 Oct; 171(15):373. PubMed ID: 22915681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the IOPen and iCare rebound tonometers with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal population.
Jorge J; Fernandes P; Queirós A; Ribeiro P; Garcês C; Gonzalez-Meijome JM
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Jan; 30(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 20444114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of intraocular pressure measurements obtained by use of a rebound tonometer and applanation tonometer in dogs before and after elective phacoemulsification.
Thompson-Hom AL; Gerding PA
Am J Vet Res; 2012 May; 73(5):709-13. PubMed ID: 22533404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The efficacy of TonoLab in detecting physiological and pharmacological changes of mouse intraocular pressure--comparison with TonoPen and microneedle manometery.
Saeki T; Aihara M; Ohashi M; Araie M
Curr Eye Res; 2008 Mar; 33(3):247-52. PubMed ID: 18350435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
