165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16409516)
1. The vibratory characteristics of obturators with different bulb height and form designs.
Oki M; Iida T; Mukohyama H; Tomizuka K; Takato T; Taniguchi H
J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Jan; 33(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 16409516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Vibration analysis of obturator prostheses with different bulb height designs.
Kobayashi M; Oki M; Ozawa S; Inoue T; Mukohyama H; Takato T; Ohyama T; Taniguchi H
J Med Dent Sci; 2002 Dec; 49(4):121-8. PubMed ID: 12641382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of obturator prostheses using vibration analysis.
Oki M; Taniguchi H; Ohyama T
J Med Dent Sci; 1999 Mar; 46(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 12160210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The vibratory properties of an obturator prosthesis with a soft lining material.
Komin O; Oki M; Phankosol P; Ohyama T; Taniguchi H
J Med Dent Sci; 2000 Mar; 47(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 12162530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In-vivo modal analysis of maxillary dentition in a maxillectomy patient wearing buccal flange obturator prostheses with different bulb height designs.
Murase I
Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 2008 Apr; 52(2):150-9. PubMed ID: 18467784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The vibration analysis of obturator framework designs.
Phankosol P; Taniguchi H; Ohyama T
J Med Dent Sci; 2000 Dec; 47(4):221-31. PubMed ID: 12160235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of obturator bulb height on speech in maxillectomy patients.
Kwon HB; Chang SW; Lee SH
J Oral Rehabil; 2011 Mar; 38(3):185-95. PubMed ID: 20819135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Electromyographic evaluation of different types of obturators constructed after maxillary resections].
Hasanreisoğlu U; Gürbüz A; Beyazova M
Ankara Univ Hekim Fak Derg; 1989 May; 16(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 2637033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Clinical comparison of different types of obturators constructed after maxillary resections].
Gürbüz A; Hasanreisoğlu U
Ankara Univ Hekim Fak Derg; 1990 Jan; 17(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 2104039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rigidity of three different types of mandibular major connector through vibratory observations.
Arksornnukit M; Taniguchi H; Ohyama T
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(6):510-6. PubMed ID: 12066696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Speech intelligibility in various types of obturators constructed after maxillary resections].
Hasanreisoğlu U; Gürbüz A; Belgin E
Ankara Univ Hekim Fak Derg; 1989 May; 16(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 2637037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy of speech aid prostheses for acquired defects of the soft palate and velopharyngeal inadequacy--clinical assessments and cephalometric analysis: a Memorial Sloan-Kettering Study.
Bohle G; Rieger J; Huryn J; Verbel D; Hwang F; Zlotolow I
Head Neck; 2005 Mar; 27(3):195-207. PubMed ID: 15700291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A custom-made sealing screw cap for a closed, hollow obturator.
Nishigawa G; Maruo Y; Jin K; Oki K; Minagi S
J Craniofac Surg; 2007 Sep; 18(5):1138-41. PubMed ID: 17912099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Vibratory properties of maxillary dentition in maxillectomy patients wearing metal framework obturator prostheses with three different metal materials.
Hoshiai T; Iida T; Taniguchi H
J Prosthodont Res; 2011 Oct; 55(4):252-61. PubMed ID: 20951663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Finite element method analysis of stress distribution to supporting tissues in a Class IV Aramany removable partial denture (Part II: bone and mucosal membrane).
Gharechahi J; Sharifi E; Nosohian S; Aghdaee NA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):49-56. PubMed ID: 18997916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimization of maxillary obturator thickness using a double-processing technique.
Oh WS; Roumanas ED
J Prosthodont; 2008 Jan; 17(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 17931364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modification of existed prosthesis into a flexible wall hollow bulb obturator by permanent silicone soft liner for a hemimaxillectomy patient with restricted mouth opening.
Singh K; Kumar N; Gupta N; Sikka R
J Prosthodont Res; 2015 Jul; 59(3):205-9. PubMed ID: 26043890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of varying bulb height on articulation and nasalance in maxillectomy patients with hollow bulb obturator.
Kumar P; Jain V; Thakar A; Aggarwal V
J Prosthodont Res; 2013 Jul; 57(3):200-5. PubMed ID: 23809296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Study on the effects of shortening the distal end of a mouthguard using modal analysis.
Yamanaka T; Ueno T; Oki M; Taniguchi H; Ohyama T
J Med Dent Sci; 2002 Dec; 49(4):129-33. PubMed ID: 12641383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A simple method of enhancing retention in interim hollow bulb obturator in a case of an acquired palatal defect.
Karthikeyan S; Balu K; Devaki V; Ajay R
J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2015 Aug; 7(Suppl 2):S782-5. PubMed ID: 26538969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
