These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16410101)
1. Is continuation of life support always the best option for neonates with congenital anatomical anomalies? Hazebroek FW J Pediatr Surg; 2006 Jan; 41(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 16410101 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Neonatal decision-making: beyond the standard of best interests. Truog RD; Sayeed SA Am J Bioeth; 2011 Feb; 11(2):44-5. PubMed ID: 21337280 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Standards, norms, and guidelines for permissible withdrawal of life support from seriously compromised newborns. Paris JJ Am J Bioeth; 2011 Feb; 11(2):33-4. PubMed ID: 21337274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Shedding light on the gray zone. Wilkinson DJ Am J Bioeth; 2011 Feb; 11(2):W3-5. PubMed ID: 21337266 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A dispute in withdrawing life-sustaining therapy. Prendergast TJ Med Ethics (Burlingt Mass); 2000; ():3, 8. PubMed ID: 15584145 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A moderate zero line approach: opposing thresholds beyond the zero line. Chen YC; Chen YY Am J Bioeth; 2011 Feb; 11(2):41-2. PubMed ID: 21337278 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The locus of decision making for severely impaired newborn infants. Sade RM Am J Bioeth; 2011 Feb; 11(2):39-40. PubMed ID: 21337277 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Ethical dilemmas in extreme prematurity: recent answers; more questions. Simeoni U; Vendemmia M; Rizzotti A; Gamerre M Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Nov; 117 Suppl 1():S33-6. PubMed ID: 15530714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What is in the best interest of the infant? Aladangady N Early Hum Dev; 2012 Feb; 88(2):71-2. PubMed ID: 22245232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. End-of-life decision before and after birth: changing ethical considerations. Pinter AB J Pediatr Surg; 2008 Mar; 43(3):430-6. PubMed ID: 18358277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Question raised by the limits of viability in extremely preterm infants]. Jarreau PH Rev Prat; 2008 Jan; 58(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 18326355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Brain death, vegetative state and the RUB: how does one arrive at the decision that a person's life is no longer worth living? Gillett G Issues Med Ethics; 1999; 7(2):54-5. PubMed ID: 16323323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Caring for a patient in a vegetative state. John G Issues Med Ethics; 2001; 9(3):77-8. PubMed ID: 16334478 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Cloudy crystal balls do not "gray" babies make. Silvers A; Francis L Am J Bioeth; 2011 Feb; 11(2):36-8. PubMed ID: 21337276 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A competent patient can decide. Karnad D Issues Med Ethics; 2001; 9(1):27-8. PubMed ID: 16334457 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Catholic tradition on forgoing life support. O'Rourke KD Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2005; 5(3):537-53. PubMed ID: 16425504 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The patient in the middle--when perspectives differ. Hayes C; Killen AR Med Ethics (Burlingt Mass); 2001; ():3, 8. PubMed ID: 15584169 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Trust her inner voice. Kothari M; Mehta L Issues Med Ethics; 2001; 9(1):27. PubMed ID: 16334456 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Variability in the limitation of life support in pediatrics continues. Catlin AJ J Clin Ethics; 2009; 20(4):327-9. PubMed ID: 20120852 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Catholicism, death and modern medicine. Cahill LS America (NY); 2005 Apr; 192(15):14-7. PubMed ID: 16739271 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]