These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

605 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16411226)

  • 1. Comparison of the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the presurgical detection of lymph node metastases in patients with uterine cervical carcinoma: a prospective study.
    Choi HJ; Roh JW; Seo SS; Lee S; Kim JY; Kim SK; Kang KW; Lee JS; Jeong JY; Park SY
    Cancer; 2006 Feb; 106(4):914-22. PubMed ID: 16411226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Additional value of MR/PET fusion compared with PET/CT in the detection of lymph node metastases in cervical cancer patients.
    Kim SK; Choi HJ; Park SY; Lee HY; Seo SS; Yoo CW; Jung DC; Kang S; Cho KS
    Eur J Cancer; 2009 Aug; 45(12):2103-9. PubMed ID: 19403303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Role of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in preoperative lymph node detection of uterine cervical cancer.
    Chung HH; Kang KW; Cho JY; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Kim SH; Chung JK; Kang SB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Aug; 203(2):156.e1-5. PubMed ID: 20435285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the validity of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the preoperative evaluation of patients with uterine corpus cancer.
    Park JY; Kim EN; Kim DY; Suh DS; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Mar; 108(3):486-92. PubMed ID: 18201753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Additional value of combined evaluation of tumor size with lymph node size in the detection of lymph node metastases in early-stage cervical cancer patients.
    Kang S; Kim YS; Choi HJ; Kim MH; Cho KS
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(4):572-6. PubMed ID: 23863534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting pelvic lymph-node metastases in patients with early-stage uterine cervical cancer: comparison with MRI findings.
    Lv K; Guo HM; Lu YJ; Wu ZX; Zhang K; Han JK
    Nucl Med Commun; 2014 Dec; 35(12):1204-11. PubMed ID: 25222911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 18F-FDG-PET/CT is of limited value in primary staging of early stage cervical cancer.
    Driscoll DO; Halpenny D; Johnston C; Sheehy N; Keogan M
    Abdom Imaging; 2015 Jan; 40(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 25015401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lymph node metastasis in patients with clinical early-stage cervical cancer: detection with integrated FDG PET/CT.
    Sironi S; Buda A; Picchio M; Perego P; Moreni R; Pellegrino A; Colombo M; Mangioni C; Messa C; Fazio F
    Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):272-9. PubMed ID: 16304090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Comprehensive Comparison of CT, MRI, Positron Emission Tomography or Positron Emission Tomography/CT, and Diffusion Weighted Imaging-MRI for Detecting the Lymph Nodes Metastases in Patients with Cervical Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Based on 67 Studies.
    Liu B; Gao S; Li S
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2017; 82(3):209-222. PubMed ID: 28183074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of retrospective PET and MRI-DWI (PET/MRI-DWI) image fusion with PET/CT and MRI-DWI in detection of cervical and endometrial cancer lymph node metastases.
    Stecco A; Buemi F; Cassarà A; Matheoud R; Sacchetti GM; Arnulfo A; Brambilla M; Carriero A
    Radiol Med; 2016 Jul; 121(7):537-45. PubMed ID: 27033474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11.
    Mayoral M; Paredes P; Domènech B; Fusté P; Vidal-Sicart S; Tapias A; Torné A; Pahisa J; Ordi J; Pons F; Lomeña F
    Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2017; 36(1):20-26. PubMed ID: 27667001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The usefulness of MRI and PET imaging for the detection of parametrial involvement and lymph node metastasis in patients with cervical cancer.
    Park W; Park YJ; Huh SJ; Kim BG; Bae DS; Lee J; Kim BH; Choi JY; Ahn YC; Lim DH
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2005 May; 35(5):260-4. PubMed ID: 15886267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in the pretherapeutic detection of occult para-aortic node involvement in patients with a locally advanced cervical carcinoma.
    Leblanc E; Gauthier H; Querleu D; Ferron G; Zerdoud S; Morice P; Uzan C; Lumbroso S; Lecuru F; Bats AS; Ghazzar N; Bannier M; Houvenaeghel G; Brenot-Rossi I; Narducci F
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Aug; 18(8):2302-9. PubMed ID: 21347790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection of hematogenous bone metastasis in cervical cancer: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography versus computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Liu FY; Yen TC; Chen MY; Lai CH; Chang TC; Chou HH; Hong JH; Chen YR; Ng KK
    Cancer; 2009 Dec; 115(23):5470-80. PubMed ID: 19739235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differential diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of lymph node metastases according to the tumor size in early-stage cervical cancer patients.
    Hong KS; Ju W; Choi HJ; Kim JK; Kim MH; Cho KS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Jul; 20(5):841-6. PubMed ID: 20606532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection of pelvic lymph node metastases in gynecologic malignancy: a comparison of CT, MR imaging, and positron emission tomography.
    Williams AD; Cousins C; Soutter WP; Mubashar M; Peters AM; Dina R; Fuchsel F; McIndoe GA; deSouza NM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Aug; 177(2):343-8. PubMed ID: 11461859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 18F-FDG PET and CT/MRI in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective study of 124 patients with histologic correlation.
    Ng SH; Yen TC; Liao CT; Chang JT; Chan SC; Ko SF; Wang HM; Wong HF
    J Nucl Med; 2005 Jul; 46(7):1136-43. PubMed ID: 16000282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lymph Node Staging with a Combined Protocol of
    Weissinger M; Taran FA; Gatidis S; Kommoss S; Nikolaou K; Sahbai S; Fougère C; Brucker SY; Dittmann H
    J Nucl Med; 2021 Aug; 62(8):1062-1067. PubMed ID: 33509973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The efficacy of preoperative positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) for detection of lymph node metastasis in cervical and endometrial cancer: clinical and pathological factors influencing it.
    Nogami Y; Banno K; Irie H; Iida M; Kisu I; Masugi Y; Tanaka K; Tominaga E; Okuda S; Murakami K; Aoki D
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2015 Jan; 45(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 25368102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the preoperative evaluation of uterine carcinosarcoma.
    Lee HJ; Park JY; Lee JJ; Kim MH; Kim DY; Suh DS; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Mar; 140(3):409-14. PubMed ID: 26777990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.